Cargando…

Genetic control of specific immune suppression. IV. Responsiveness to the random copolymer L-glutamic acid(50)-L-tyrosine(50) induced in BALB/c mice by cyclophosphamide

Previous reports from our laboratory have demonstrated the stimulation of specific suppressor T cells in genetic nonresponder mice after immunization with the terpolymer of L- glutamic acid, L-alanine, and L-tyrosine (GAT) (1,2) and with the copolymer of L-glutamic acid and L-tyrosine (GT) (3-5). Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Debre, P, Waltenbaugh, C, Dorf, ME, Benacerraf, B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1976
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2190349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1084407
_version_ 1782146783286132736
author Debre, P
Waltenbaugh, C
Dorf, ME
Benacerraf, B
author_facet Debre, P
Waltenbaugh, C
Dorf, ME
Benacerraf, B
author_sort Debre, P
collection PubMed
description Previous reports from our laboratory have demonstrated the stimulation of specific suppressor T cells in genetic nonresponder mice after immunization with the terpolymer of L- glutamic acid, L-alanine, and L-tyrosine (GAT) (1,2) and with the copolymer of L-glutamic acid and L-tyrosine (GT) (3-5). These findings raise two important questions: (a) do the specific suppressor T cells inhibit an antibody response which would otherwise develop in nonresponder mice; and, (b) can specific helper T cells inhibit an antibody response which would otherwise develop in nonresponder mice; and, (b) can specific helper T-cell activity be detected in these animals. Responsiveness appears to be completely dominant over suppression in (responder x suppressor)F(1) hybrids, therefore, we have been unable to detect suppressor cells in these hybrids after conventional immunization with GAT (2). However , using special conditions of antigen administration, GAT helper activity could be demonstrated in nonresponder DBA/1 (“suppressor”) mice. Thus, GAT-specific helper activity was not detected in these nonresponder animals after immunization with GAT irrespective of the adjuvant used, but could be stimulated by macrophage-bound GAT or by GAT complexed with methylated bovine serum albumin GAT-MBSA (6). In the current report we have taken advantage of the fact that suppressor T-cell activity is more sensitive to cyclophosphamide treatment than T-cell helper activity (7) to demonstrate the presence of GT-specific helper activity in “nonresponder” BALB/c mice. We describe: (a) the dose of cyclophosphamide and conditions of treatment which inhibits the well-documented stimulation of specific suppressor T cells in BALB/c mice injected with GT previous to immunization with GT-MBSA, and (b) the ability of cyclophosphamide to permit the development of primary PFC responses to GT in these “nonresponder” mice. These cyclophosphamide-induced responses are not characterized by the high levels of antibody detected in genetic responder animals.
format Text
id pubmed-2190349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1976
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21903492008-04-17 Genetic control of specific immune suppression. IV. Responsiveness to the random copolymer L-glutamic acid(50)-L-tyrosine(50) induced in BALB/c mice by cyclophosphamide Debre, P Waltenbaugh, C Dorf, ME Benacerraf, B J Exp Med Articles Previous reports from our laboratory have demonstrated the stimulation of specific suppressor T cells in genetic nonresponder mice after immunization with the terpolymer of L- glutamic acid, L-alanine, and L-tyrosine (GAT) (1,2) and with the copolymer of L-glutamic acid and L-tyrosine (GT) (3-5). These findings raise two important questions: (a) do the specific suppressor T cells inhibit an antibody response which would otherwise develop in nonresponder mice; and, (b) can specific helper T cells inhibit an antibody response which would otherwise develop in nonresponder mice; and, (b) can specific helper T-cell activity be detected in these animals. Responsiveness appears to be completely dominant over suppression in (responder x suppressor)F(1) hybrids, therefore, we have been unable to detect suppressor cells in these hybrids after conventional immunization with GAT (2). However , using special conditions of antigen administration, GAT helper activity could be demonstrated in nonresponder DBA/1 (“suppressor”) mice. Thus, GAT-specific helper activity was not detected in these nonresponder animals after immunization with GAT irrespective of the adjuvant used, but could be stimulated by macrophage-bound GAT or by GAT complexed with methylated bovine serum albumin GAT-MBSA (6). In the current report we have taken advantage of the fact that suppressor T-cell activity is more sensitive to cyclophosphamide treatment than T-cell helper activity (7) to demonstrate the presence of GT-specific helper activity in “nonresponder” BALB/c mice. We describe: (a) the dose of cyclophosphamide and conditions of treatment which inhibits the well-documented stimulation of specific suppressor T cells in BALB/c mice injected with GT previous to immunization with GT-MBSA, and (b) the ability of cyclophosphamide to permit the development of primary PFC responses to GT in these “nonresponder” mice. These cyclophosphamide-induced responses are not characterized by the high levels of antibody detected in genetic responder animals. The Rockefeller University Press 1976-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2190349/ /pubmed/1084407 Text en This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Debre, P
Waltenbaugh, C
Dorf, ME
Benacerraf, B
Genetic control of specific immune suppression. IV. Responsiveness to the random copolymer L-glutamic acid(50)-L-tyrosine(50) induced in BALB/c mice by cyclophosphamide
title Genetic control of specific immune suppression. IV. Responsiveness to the random copolymer L-glutamic acid(50)-L-tyrosine(50) induced in BALB/c mice by cyclophosphamide
title_full Genetic control of specific immune suppression. IV. Responsiveness to the random copolymer L-glutamic acid(50)-L-tyrosine(50) induced in BALB/c mice by cyclophosphamide
title_fullStr Genetic control of specific immune suppression. IV. Responsiveness to the random copolymer L-glutamic acid(50)-L-tyrosine(50) induced in BALB/c mice by cyclophosphamide
title_full_unstemmed Genetic control of specific immune suppression. IV. Responsiveness to the random copolymer L-glutamic acid(50)-L-tyrosine(50) induced in BALB/c mice by cyclophosphamide
title_short Genetic control of specific immune suppression. IV. Responsiveness to the random copolymer L-glutamic acid(50)-L-tyrosine(50) induced in BALB/c mice by cyclophosphamide
title_sort genetic control of specific immune suppression. iv. responsiveness to the random copolymer l-glutamic acid(50)-l-tyrosine(50) induced in balb/c mice by cyclophosphamide
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2190349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1084407
work_keys_str_mv AT debrep geneticcontrolofspecificimmunesuppressionivresponsivenesstotherandomcopolymerlglutamicacid50ltyrosine50inducedinbalbcmicebycyclophosphamide
AT waltenbaughc geneticcontrolofspecificimmunesuppressionivresponsivenesstotherandomcopolymerlglutamicacid50ltyrosine50inducedinbalbcmicebycyclophosphamide
AT dorfme geneticcontrolofspecificimmunesuppressionivresponsivenesstotherandomcopolymerlglutamicacid50ltyrosine50inducedinbalbcmicebycyclophosphamide
AT benacerrafb geneticcontrolofspecificimmunesuppressionivresponsivenesstotherandomcopolymerlglutamicacid50ltyrosine50inducedinbalbcmicebycyclophosphamide