Cargando…

Interleukin 10 but not interleukin 4 is a natural suppressant of cutaneous inflammatory responses

We have examined the role of endogenously produced interleukin (IL) 4 and IL-10 in the regulation of inflammatory and immune reactions in the skin. In these experiments, irritant and contact hypersensitivity (CH) responses were elicited in mice with targeted disruptions of the IL-4 (IL-4T) or IL-10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1995
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2192105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7790826
_version_ 1782147161955237888
collection PubMed
description We have examined the role of endogenously produced interleukin (IL) 4 and IL-10 in the regulation of inflammatory and immune reactions in the skin. In these experiments, irritant and contact hypersensitivity (CH) responses were elicited in mice with targeted disruptions of the IL-4 (IL-4T) or IL-10 (IL-10T) gene. Our study showed that IL-4T and wild- type (wt) mice exhibited equivalent responses to the irritant croton oil. In contrast, the response of IL-10T mice challenged with croton oil was abnormally increased. When IL-10T mice were exposed to a higher dose of irritant, irreversible tissue damage occurred. By comparison, any treatment of wt mice with croton oil resulted in far less tissue damage and resolution of inflammation. Neutralizing antibody studies demonstrated that the necrosis that occurred in IL-10T mice was due to the overproduction of tumor necrosis factor. The anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody treatment of IL-10T mice did not significantly reduce the edema or the influx of inflammatory cells, suggesting that these changes were due to the uncontrolled production of other proinflammatory cytokines. T cell-dependent immune responses were also evaluated using the contact sensitizer oxazolone. The response of IL-4T mice did not differ from wt mice. In contrast, IL-10T mice mounted an exaggerated CH response, increased in both magnitude and duration as compared with wt mice. Based on these studies, we have concluded that IL-10, but not IL-4, is a natural suppressant of irritant responses and of CH, and it limits immunopathologic damage in the skin.
format Text
id pubmed-2192105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1995
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21921052008-04-16 Interleukin 10 but not interleukin 4 is a natural suppressant of cutaneous inflammatory responses J Exp Med Articles We have examined the role of endogenously produced interleukin (IL) 4 and IL-10 in the regulation of inflammatory and immune reactions in the skin. In these experiments, irritant and contact hypersensitivity (CH) responses were elicited in mice with targeted disruptions of the IL-4 (IL-4T) or IL-10 (IL-10T) gene. Our study showed that IL-4T and wild- type (wt) mice exhibited equivalent responses to the irritant croton oil. In contrast, the response of IL-10T mice challenged with croton oil was abnormally increased. When IL-10T mice were exposed to a higher dose of irritant, irreversible tissue damage occurred. By comparison, any treatment of wt mice with croton oil resulted in far less tissue damage and resolution of inflammation. Neutralizing antibody studies demonstrated that the necrosis that occurred in IL-10T mice was due to the overproduction of tumor necrosis factor. The anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody treatment of IL-10T mice did not significantly reduce the edema or the influx of inflammatory cells, suggesting that these changes were due to the uncontrolled production of other proinflammatory cytokines. T cell-dependent immune responses were also evaluated using the contact sensitizer oxazolone. The response of IL-4T mice did not differ from wt mice. In contrast, IL-10T mice mounted an exaggerated CH response, increased in both magnitude and duration as compared with wt mice. Based on these studies, we have concluded that IL-10, but not IL-4, is a natural suppressant of irritant responses and of CH, and it limits immunopathologic damage in the skin. The Rockefeller University Press 1995-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2192105/ /pubmed/7790826 Text en This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Interleukin 10 but not interleukin 4 is a natural suppressant of cutaneous inflammatory responses
title Interleukin 10 but not interleukin 4 is a natural suppressant of cutaneous inflammatory responses
title_full Interleukin 10 but not interleukin 4 is a natural suppressant of cutaneous inflammatory responses
title_fullStr Interleukin 10 but not interleukin 4 is a natural suppressant of cutaneous inflammatory responses
title_full_unstemmed Interleukin 10 but not interleukin 4 is a natural suppressant of cutaneous inflammatory responses
title_short Interleukin 10 but not interleukin 4 is a natural suppressant of cutaneous inflammatory responses
title_sort interleukin 10 but not interleukin 4 is a natural suppressant of cutaneous inflammatory responses
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2192105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7790826