Cargando…

Epitope focusing in the primary cytotoxic T cell response to Epstein- Barr virus and its relationship to T cell memory

The relationship between primary and memory cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses, and the factors influencing entry into memory, are poorly understood. Here we address this in the context of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a persistent human herpesvirus in which memory CTL responses in long-term virus c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2192864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8920868
_version_ 1782147335877296128
collection PubMed
description The relationship between primary and memory cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses, and the factors influencing entry into memory, are poorly understood. Here we address this in the context of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a persistent human herpesvirus in which memory CTL responses in long-term virus carriers are highly focused on epitopes preferentially drawn from just three of the eight available virus latent proteins, EBNAs 3A, 3B, and 3C. To determine whether this unusual level of focusing is a consequence of long-term virus challenge, we carried out a detailed analysis of EBV antigen/epitope specificities in the primary virus-induced CTL response in 10 infectious mononucleosis (IM) patients of different HLA types. Primary effectors, studied in ex vivo assays and by limiting dilution cloning in vitro, were again highly skewed toward a small number of viral epitopes, almost all derived from the EBNA3 proteins, with CTL to the immunodominant epitope accounting for at least 1% of the circulating CD8+ IM T cell pool. This is the first unequivocal demonstration of an EBV-specific CD8+ CTL response in IM. Prospective studies on individual patients showed that, whereas all of the EBV reactivities found in CTL memory had been detectable earlier during primary infection, the memory population was not simply a scaled down version of the primary response. In particular (a) differences in the relative frequencies of CTL to immunodominant versus subdominant epitopes appeared to be much less marked in memory than in primary populations, and (b) we found at least one clear example in which a significant virus-specific reactivity within the primary response was never detectable in memory.
format Text
id pubmed-2192864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1996
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21928642008-04-16 Epitope focusing in the primary cytotoxic T cell response to Epstein- Barr virus and its relationship to T cell memory J Exp Med Articles The relationship between primary and memory cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses, and the factors influencing entry into memory, are poorly understood. Here we address this in the context of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a persistent human herpesvirus in which memory CTL responses in long-term virus carriers are highly focused on epitopes preferentially drawn from just three of the eight available virus latent proteins, EBNAs 3A, 3B, and 3C. To determine whether this unusual level of focusing is a consequence of long-term virus challenge, we carried out a detailed analysis of EBV antigen/epitope specificities in the primary virus-induced CTL response in 10 infectious mononucleosis (IM) patients of different HLA types. Primary effectors, studied in ex vivo assays and by limiting dilution cloning in vitro, were again highly skewed toward a small number of viral epitopes, almost all derived from the EBNA3 proteins, with CTL to the immunodominant epitope accounting for at least 1% of the circulating CD8+ IM T cell pool. This is the first unequivocal demonstration of an EBV-specific CD8+ CTL response in IM. Prospective studies on individual patients showed that, whereas all of the EBV reactivities found in CTL memory had been detectable earlier during primary infection, the memory population was not simply a scaled down version of the primary response. In particular (a) differences in the relative frequencies of CTL to immunodominant versus subdominant epitopes appeared to be much less marked in memory than in primary populations, and (b) we found at least one clear example in which a significant virus-specific reactivity within the primary response was never detectable in memory. The Rockefeller University Press 1996-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2192864/ /pubmed/8920868 Text en This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Epitope focusing in the primary cytotoxic T cell response to Epstein- Barr virus and its relationship to T cell memory
title Epitope focusing in the primary cytotoxic T cell response to Epstein- Barr virus and its relationship to T cell memory
title_full Epitope focusing in the primary cytotoxic T cell response to Epstein- Barr virus and its relationship to T cell memory
title_fullStr Epitope focusing in the primary cytotoxic T cell response to Epstein- Barr virus and its relationship to T cell memory
title_full_unstemmed Epitope focusing in the primary cytotoxic T cell response to Epstein- Barr virus and its relationship to T cell memory
title_short Epitope focusing in the primary cytotoxic T cell response to Epstein- Barr virus and its relationship to T cell memory
title_sort epitope focusing in the primary cytotoxic t cell response to epstein- barr virus and its relationship to t cell memory
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2192864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8920868