Cargando…

Physical Variables in the Olfactory Stimulation Process

Electrical recording from small twigs of nerve in a tortoise showed that olfactory, vomeronasal, and trigeminal receptors in the nose are responsive to various odorants. No one kind of receptor was most sensitive to all odorants. For controlled stimulation, odorant was caused to appear in a stream o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tucker, Don
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1963
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2195282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13994681
_version_ 1782147809063993344
author Tucker, Don
author_facet Tucker, Don
author_sort Tucker, Don
collection PubMed
description Electrical recording from small twigs of nerve in a tortoise showed that olfactory, vomeronasal, and trigeminal receptors in the nose are responsive to various odorants. No one kind of receptor was most sensitive to all odorants. For controlled stimulation, odorant was caused to appear in a stream of gas already flowing through the nose. Of the parameters definable at the naris, temperature, relative humidity, and nature of inert gas had little effect on olfactory responses to amyl acetate, whereas odorant species, odorant concentration, and volume flow rate effectively determined the responses of all nasal chemoreceptors. An intrinsic variable of accessibility to the receptors, particularly olfactory, was demonstrated. Flow dependence of chemoreceptor responses is thought to reflect the necessity for delivery of odorant molecules to receptor sites. Since the olfactory receptors are relatively exposed, plateauing of the response with flow rate for slightly soluble odorants suggests an approach to concentration equilibrium in the overlying mucus with that in the air entering the naris. Accordingly, data for responses to amyl acetate were fitted with Beidler's (1954) taste equation for two kinds of sites being active. The requirement for finite aqueous solubility, if true, suggests substitution of aqueous solutions for gaseous solutions. A suitable medium was found and results conformed to expectations. Olfactory receptors were insensitive to variation of ionic strength, pH, and osmotic pressure.
format Text
id pubmed-2195282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1963
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21952822008-04-23 Physical Variables in the Olfactory Stimulation Process Tucker, Don J Gen Physiol Article Electrical recording from small twigs of nerve in a tortoise showed that olfactory, vomeronasal, and trigeminal receptors in the nose are responsive to various odorants. No one kind of receptor was most sensitive to all odorants. For controlled stimulation, odorant was caused to appear in a stream of gas already flowing through the nose. Of the parameters definable at the naris, temperature, relative humidity, and nature of inert gas had little effect on olfactory responses to amyl acetate, whereas odorant species, odorant concentration, and volume flow rate effectively determined the responses of all nasal chemoreceptors. An intrinsic variable of accessibility to the receptors, particularly olfactory, was demonstrated. Flow dependence of chemoreceptor responses is thought to reflect the necessity for delivery of odorant molecules to receptor sites. Since the olfactory receptors are relatively exposed, plateauing of the response with flow rate for slightly soluble odorants suggests an approach to concentration equilibrium in the overlying mucus with that in the air entering the naris. Accordingly, data for responses to amyl acetate were fitted with Beidler's (1954) taste equation for two kinds of sites being active. The requirement for finite aqueous solubility, if true, suggests substitution of aqueous solutions for gaseous solutions. A suitable medium was found and results conformed to expectations. Olfactory receptors were insensitive to variation of ionic strength, pH, and osmotic pressure. The Rockefeller University Press 1963-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2195282/ /pubmed/13994681 Text en Copyright ©, 1963, by The Rockefeller Institute Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tucker, Don
Physical Variables in the Olfactory Stimulation Process
title Physical Variables in the Olfactory Stimulation Process
title_full Physical Variables in the Olfactory Stimulation Process
title_fullStr Physical Variables in the Olfactory Stimulation Process
title_full_unstemmed Physical Variables in the Olfactory Stimulation Process
title_short Physical Variables in the Olfactory Stimulation Process
title_sort physical variables in the olfactory stimulation process
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2195282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13994681
work_keys_str_mv AT tuckerdon physicalvariablesintheolfactorystimulationprocess