Cargando…

Chromosome Movement in Mitosis Requires Microtubule Anchorage at Spindle Poles

Anchorage of microtubule minus ends at spindle poles has been proposed to bear the load of poleward forces exerted by kinetochore-associated motors so that chromosomes move toward the poles rather than the poles toward the chromosomes. To test this hypothesis, we monitored chromosome movement during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gordon, Michael B., Howard, Louisa, Compton, Duane A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2196006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11157972
_version_ 1782147974585909248
author Gordon, Michael B.
Howard, Louisa
Compton, Duane A.
author_facet Gordon, Michael B.
Howard, Louisa
Compton, Duane A.
author_sort Gordon, Michael B.
collection PubMed
description Anchorage of microtubule minus ends at spindle poles has been proposed to bear the load of poleward forces exerted by kinetochore-associated motors so that chromosomes move toward the poles rather than the poles toward the chromosomes. To test this hypothesis, we monitored chromosome movement during mitosis after perturbation of nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA) and the human homologue of the KIN C motor family (HSET), two noncentrosomal proteins involved in spindle pole organization in animal cells. Perturbation of NuMA alone disrupts spindle pole organization and delays anaphase onset, but does not alter the velocity of oscillatory chromosome movement in prometaphase. Perturbation of HSET alone increases the duration of prometaphase, but does not alter the velocity of chromosome movement in prometaphase or anaphase. In contrast, simultaneous perturbation of both HSET and NuMA severely suppresses directed chromosome movement in prometaphase. Chromosomes coalesce near the center of these cells on bi-oriented spindles that lack organized poles. Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy verify microtubule attachment to sister kinetochores, but this attachment fails to generate proper tension across sister kinetochores. These results demonstrate that anchorage of microtubule minus ends at spindle poles mediated by overlapping mechanisms involving both NuMA and HSET is essential for chromosome movement during mitosis.
format Text
id pubmed-2196006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21960062008-05-01 Chromosome Movement in Mitosis Requires Microtubule Anchorage at Spindle Poles Gordon, Michael B. Howard, Louisa Compton, Duane A. J Cell Biol Original Article Anchorage of microtubule minus ends at spindle poles has been proposed to bear the load of poleward forces exerted by kinetochore-associated motors so that chromosomes move toward the poles rather than the poles toward the chromosomes. To test this hypothesis, we monitored chromosome movement during mitosis after perturbation of nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA) and the human homologue of the KIN C motor family (HSET), two noncentrosomal proteins involved in spindle pole organization in animal cells. Perturbation of NuMA alone disrupts spindle pole organization and delays anaphase onset, but does not alter the velocity of oscillatory chromosome movement in prometaphase. Perturbation of HSET alone increases the duration of prometaphase, but does not alter the velocity of chromosome movement in prometaphase or anaphase. In contrast, simultaneous perturbation of both HSET and NuMA severely suppresses directed chromosome movement in prometaphase. Chromosomes coalesce near the center of these cells on bi-oriented spindles that lack organized poles. Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy verify microtubule attachment to sister kinetochores, but this attachment fails to generate proper tension across sister kinetochores. These results demonstrate that anchorage of microtubule minus ends at spindle poles mediated by overlapping mechanisms involving both NuMA and HSET is essential for chromosome movement during mitosis. The Rockefeller University Press 2001-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2196006/ /pubmed/11157972 Text en © 2001 The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Gordon, Michael B.
Howard, Louisa
Compton, Duane A.
Chromosome Movement in Mitosis Requires Microtubule Anchorage at Spindle Poles
title Chromosome Movement in Mitosis Requires Microtubule Anchorage at Spindle Poles
title_full Chromosome Movement in Mitosis Requires Microtubule Anchorage at Spindle Poles
title_fullStr Chromosome Movement in Mitosis Requires Microtubule Anchorage at Spindle Poles
title_full_unstemmed Chromosome Movement in Mitosis Requires Microtubule Anchorage at Spindle Poles
title_short Chromosome Movement in Mitosis Requires Microtubule Anchorage at Spindle Poles
title_sort chromosome movement in mitosis requires microtubule anchorage at spindle poles
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2196006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11157972
work_keys_str_mv AT gordonmichaelb chromosomemovementinmitosisrequiresmicrotubuleanchorageatspindlepoles
AT howardlouisa chromosomemovementinmitosisrequiresmicrotubuleanchorageatspindlepoles
AT comptonduanea chromosomemovementinmitosisrequiresmicrotubuleanchorageatspindlepoles