Cargando…
Representation and Re-Presentation in Litigation Science
Federal appellate courts have devised several criteria to help judges distinguish between reliable and unreliable scientific evidence. The best known are the U.S. Supreme Court’s criteria offered in 1993 in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This article focuses on another criterion, offer...
Autor principal: | Jasanoff, Sheila |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2199272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18197311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9976 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation
por: Jasanoff, Sheila
Publicado: (2010) -
Preface: Science for Regulation and Litigation
por: Michaels, David
Publicado: (2008) -
Dental Litigation, Past and Present
por: Head, Joseph
Publicado: (1892) -
Litigation Friends or Foes? Representation of ‘P’ before the Court of Protection
por: Ruck Keene, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Litigation-Generated Science: Why Should We Care?
por: Boden, Leslie I., et al.
Publicado: (2008)