Cargando…

Differential regulation of multiple gap junction transcripts and proteins during rat liver regeneration

The mRNA and protein expression of alpha 1 (connexin 43), beta 1 (connexin 32), and beta 2 (connexin 26) gap junction genes were examined in the regenerating rat liver after 70% partial hepatectomy (PH). Expression of beta 1 and beta 2 steady-state mRNA levels changed minimally until 12 h after PH w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1993
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2200133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8227133
_version_ 1782148270296924160
collection PubMed
description The mRNA and protein expression of alpha 1 (connexin 43), beta 1 (connexin 32), and beta 2 (connexin 26) gap junction genes were examined in the regenerating rat liver after 70% partial hepatectomy (PH). Expression of beta 1 and beta 2 steady-state mRNA levels changed minimally until 12 h after PH when both transcripts decreased to approximately 15% of baseline values. A similar decrease in assembled connexin levels was detected by immunoblot and indirect immunofluorescence at 18 h after PH. Both transcripts simultaneously increased between 24 and 42 h and again rapidly decreased by 48 h post- PH. beta 1 and beta 2 assembled gap junction protein expression increased at 48 h post-PH and rapidly decreased by 56 h. By 72 to 84 h post-PH, beta 1 and beta 2 mRNA and assembled protein expression returned to near baseline levels and were maintained. Interestingly, inhibition of protein synthesis with cycloheximide completely inhibited disappearance of the beta 2 transcript, in contrast to beta 1 mRNA which was unaffected. Nuclear run-on assays showed no change in transcriptional rates for either gene during the regenerative period. However, both beta 1 and beta 2 transcripts exhibited significantly decreased mRNA half-lives at 12 h post-PH (3.8 and 3.7 h, respectively) relative to those at 0 h (10.9 and 6.1 h, respectively). Surprisingly, although the transcriptional rate for alpha 1 was similar to that observed for beta 2, no alpha 1 transcripts were detectable by northern or RNase protection analysis. The results suggest that in the regenerating rat liver, beta 1 and beta 2 gap junction genes are not regulated at the transcriptional level. Rather, the cyclical modulation of their steady-state transcripts is regulated primarily by posttranscriptional events of which mRNA stability is at least one critical factor in the control process.
format Text
id pubmed-2200133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1993
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22001332008-05-01 Differential regulation of multiple gap junction transcripts and proteins during rat liver regeneration J Cell Biol Articles The mRNA and protein expression of alpha 1 (connexin 43), beta 1 (connexin 32), and beta 2 (connexin 26) gap junction genes were examined in the regenerating rat liver after 70% partial hepatectomy (PH). Expression of beta 1 and beta 2 steady-state mRNA levels changed minimally until 12 h after PH when both transcripts decreased to approximately 15% of baseline values. A similar decrease in assembled connexin levels was detected by immunoblot and indirect immunofluorescence at 18 h after PH. Both transcripts simultaneously increased between 24 and 42 h and again rapidly decreased by 48 h post- PH. beta 1 and beta 2 assembled gap junction protein expression increased at 48 h post-PH and rapidly decreased by 56 h. By 72 to 84 h post-PH, beta 1 and beta 2 mRNA and assembled protein expression returned to near baseline levels and were maintained. Interestingly, inhibition of protein synthesis with cycloheximide completely inhibited disappearance of the beta 2 transcript, in contrast to beta 1 mRNA which was unaffected. Nuclear run-on assays showed no change in transcriptional rates for either gene during the regenerative period. However, both beta 1 and beta 2 transcripts exhibited significantly decreased mRNA half-lives at 12 h post-PH (3.8 and 3.7 h, respectively) relative to those at 0 h (10.9 and 6.1 h, respectively). Surprisingly, although the transcriptional rate for alpha 1 was similar to that observed for beta 2, no alpha 1 transcripts were detectable by northern or RNase protection analysis. The results suggest that in the regenerating rat liver, beta 1 and beta 2 gap junction genes are not regulated at the transcriptional level. Rather, the cyclical modulation of their steady-state transcripts is regulated primarily by posttranscriptional events of which mRNA stability is at least one critical factor in the control process. The Rockefeller University Press 1993-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2200133/ /pubmed/8227133 Text en This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Differential regulation of multiple gap junction transcripts and proteins during rat liver regeneration
title Differential regulation of multiple gap junction transcripts and proteins during rat liver regeneration
title_full Differential regulation of multiple gap junction transcripts and proteins during rat liver regeneration
title_fullStr Differential regulation of multiple gap junction transcripts and proteins during rat liver regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Differential regulation of multiple gap junction transcripts and proteins during rat liver regeneration
title_short Differential regulation of multiple gap junction transcripts and proteins during rat liver regeneration
title_sort differential regulation of multiple gap junction transcripts and proteins during rat liver regeneration
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2200133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8227133