Cargando…
Capacitance of the Surface and Transverse Tubular Membrane of Frog Sartorius Muscle Fibers
The passive electrical properties of glycerol-treated muscle fibers, which have virtually no transverse tubules, were determined. Current was passed through one intracellular microelectrode and the time course and spatial distribution of the resulting potential displacement measured with another. Th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Rockefeller University Press
1969
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2202908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5767332 |
_version_ | 1782148343926882304 |
---|---|
author | Gage, Peter W. Eisenberg, Robert S. |
author_facet | Gage, Peter W. Eisenberg, Robert S. |
author_sort | Gage, Peter W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The passive electrical properties of glycerol-treated muscle fibers, which have virtually no transverse tubules, were determined. Current was passed through one intracellular microelectrode and the time course and spatial distribution of the resulting potential displacement measured with another. The results were analyzed by using conventional cable equations. The membrane resistance of fibers without tubules was 3759 ± 331 ohm-cm(2) and the internal resistivity 192 ohm-cm. Both these figures are essentially the same as those found in normal muscle fibers. The capacitance of the fibers without tubules is strikingly smaller than normal, being 2.24 ± 0.14 µF/cm(2). Measurements were also made of the passive electrical properties of fibers in a Ringer solution containing 400 mM glycerol (which is used in the preparation of glycerol-treated fibers). The membrane resistance and capacitance are essentially normal, but the internal resistivity is somewhat reduced. These results show that glycerol in this concentration does not directly affect the membrane capacitance. Thus, the figure for the capacitance of glycerol-treated fibers, which agrees well with previous estimates made by different techniques, represents the capacitance of the outer membrane of the fiber. Estimates of the capacitance per unit area of the tubular membrane are made and the significance of the difference between the figures for the capacitance of the surface and tubular membrane is discussed. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2202908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1969 |
publisher | The Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22029082008-04-23 Capacitance of the Surface and Transverse Tubular Membrane of Frog Sartorius Muscle Fibers Gage, Peter W. Eisenberg, Robert S. J Gen Physiol Article The passive electrical properties of glycerol-treated muscle fibers, which have virtually no transverse tubules, were determined. Current was passed through one intracellular microelectrode and the time course and spatial distribution of the resulting potential displacement measured with another. The results were analyzed by using conventional cable equations. The membrane resistance of fibers without tubules was 3759 ± 331 ohm-cm(2) and the internal resistivity 192 ohm-cm. Both these figures are essentially the same as those found in normal muscle fibers. The capacitance of the fibers without tubules is strikingly smaller than normal, being 2.24 ± 0.14 µF/cm(2). Measurements were also made of the passive electrical properties of fibers in a Ringer solution containing 400 mM glycerol (which is used in the preparation of glycerol-treated fibers). The membrane resistance and capacitance are essentially normal, but the internal resistivity is somewhat reduced. These results show that glycerol in this concentration does not directly affect the membrane capacitance. Thus, the figure for the capacitance of glycerol-treated fibers, which agrees well with previous estimates made by different techniques, represents the capacitance of the outer membrane of the fiber. Estimates of the capacitance per unit area of the tubular membrane are made and the significance of the difference between the figures for the capacitance of the surface and tubular membrane is discussed. The Rockefeller University Press 1969-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2202908/ /pubmed/5767332 Text en Copyright © 1969 by The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gage, Peter W. Eisenberg, Robert S. Capacitance of the Surface and Transverse Tubular Membrane of Frog Sartorius Muscle Fibers |
title | Capacitance of the Surface and Transverse Tubular Membrane of Frog Sartorius Muscle Fibers |
title_full | Capacitance of the Surface and Transverse Tubular Membrane of Frog Sartorius Muscle Fibers |
title_fullStr | Capacitance of the Surface and Transverse Tubular Membrane of Frog Sartorius Muscle Fibers |
title_full_unstemmed | Capacitance of the Surface and Transverse Tubular Membrane of Frog Sartorius Muscle Fibers |
title_short | Capacitance of the Surface and Transverse Tubular Membrane of Frog Sartorius Muscle Fibers |
title_sort | capacitance of the surface and transverse tubular membrane of frog sartorius muscle fibers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2202908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5767332 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gagepeterw capacitanceofthesurfaceandtransversetubularmembraneoffrogsartoriusmusclefibers AT eisenbergroberts capacitanceofthesurfaceandtransversetubularmembraneoffrogsartoriusmusclefibers |