Cargando…

Electrophysiological Control of Reversed Ciliary Beating in Paramecium

Quantitative relations between ciliary reversal and membrane responses were examined in electrically stimulated paramecia. Specimens bathed in 1 mM CaCl(2), 1 mM KCl, and 1 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, were filmed at 250 frames per second while depolarizing current pulses were injected. At current intensiti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Machemer, Hans, Eckert, Roger
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1973
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2203482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4705638
_version_ 1782148389758042112
author Machemer, Hans
Eckert, Roger
author_facet Machemer, Hans
Eckert, Roger
author_sort Machemer, Hans
collection PubMed
description Quantitative relations between ciliary reversal and membrane responses were examined in electrically stimulated paramecia. Specimens bathed in 1 mM CaCl(2), 1 mM KCl, and 1 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, were filmed at 250 frames per second while depolarizing current pulses were injected. At current intensities producing only electrotonic shifts the cilia failed to respond. Stimuli which elicited a regenerative response were followed by a period of reversed ciliary beating. With increasing stimulus intensities the latency of ciliary reversal dropped from 30 to 4 ms or less, and the duration of reversal increased from 50 ms to 2.4 s or more; the corresponding regenerative responses increased in amplitude and rate of rise. With progressively larger intracellular positive pulses, electric stimulation became less effective, producing responses with a progressive increase in latency and decrease in duration of reversed beating of the cilia. When 100-ms pulses shifted the membrane potential to +70 mV or more, ciliary reversal was suppressed until the end of the pulse. "Off" responses then occurred with a latency of 2–4 ms independent of further increases in positive potential displacement. These results suggest that ciliary reversal is coupled to membrane depolarization by the influx of ions which produces the regenerative depolarization of the surface membrane. According to this view suppression of the ciliary response during stimulation occurs when the membrane potential approaches the equilibrium potential of the coupling ion, thereby retarding its influx. Previous data together with the present findings suggest that this ion is Ca(2+).
format Text
id pubmed-2203482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1973
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22034822008-04-23 Electrophysiological Control of Reversed Ciliary Beating in Paramecium Machemer, Hans Eckert, Roger J Gen Physiol Article Quantitative relations between ciliary reversal and membrane responses were examined in electrically stimulated paramecia. Specimens bathed in 1 mM CaCl(2), 1 mM KCl, and 1 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, were filmed at 250 frames per second while depolarizing current pulses were injected. At current intensities producing only electrotonic shifts the cilia failed to respond. Stimuli which elicited a regenerative response were followed by a period of reversed ciliary beating. With increasing stimulus intensities the latency of ciliary reversal dropped from 30 to 4 ms or less, and the duration of reversal increased from 50 ms to 2.4 s or more; the corresponding regenerative responses increased in amplitude and rate of rise. With progressively larger intracellular positive pulses, electric stimulation became less effective, producing responses with a progressive increase in latency and decrease in duration of reversed beating of the cilia. When 100-ms pulses shifted the membrane potential to +70 mV or more, ciliary reversal was suppressed until the end of the pulse. "Off" responses then occurred with a latency of 2–4 ms independent of further increases in positive potential displacement. These results suggest that ciliary reversal is coupled to membrane depolarization by the influx of ions which produces the regenerative depolarization of the surface membrane. According to this view suppression of the ciliary response during stimulation occurs when the membrane potential approaches the equilibrium potential of the coupling ion, thereby retarding its influx. Previous data together with the present findings suggest that this ion is Ca(2+). The Rockefeller University Press 1973-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2203482/ /pubmed/4705638 Text en Copyright © 1973 by The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Machemer, Hans
Eckert, Roger
Electrophysiological Control of Reversed Ciliary Beating in Paramecium
title Electrophysiological Control of Reversed Ciliary Beating in Paramecium
title_full Electrophysiological Control of Reversed Ciliary Beating in Paramecium
title_fullStr Electrophysiological Control of Reversed Ciliary Beating in Paramecium
title_full_unstemmed Electrophysiological Control of Reversed Ciliary Beating in Paramecium
title_short Electrophysiological Control of Reversed Ciliary Beating in Paramecium
title_sort electrophysiological control of reversed ciliary beating in paramecium
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2203482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4705638
work_keys_str_mv AT machemerhans electrophysiologicalcontrolofreversedciliarybeatinginparamecium
AT eckertroger electrophysiologicalcontrolofreversedciliarybeatinginparamecium