Cargando…

Regular mosaic pattern development: A study of the interplay between lateral inhibition, apoptosis and differential adhesion

BACKGROUND: A significant body of literature is devoted to modeling developmental mechanisms that create patterns within groups of initially equivalent embryonic cells. Although it is clear that these mechanisms do not function in isolation, the timing of and interactions between these mechanisms du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Podgorski, Gregory J, Bansal, Mayank, Flann, Nicholas S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2203995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17974031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-4-43
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: A significant body of literature is devoted to modeling developmental mechanisms that create patterns within groups of initially equivalent embryonic cells. Although it is clear that these mechanisms do not function in isolation, the timing of and interactions between these mechanisms during embryogenesis is not well known. In this work, a computational approach was taken to understand how lateral inhibition, differential adhesion and programmed cell death can interact to create a mosaic pattern of biologically realistic primary and secondary cells, such as that formed by sensory (primary) and supporting (secondary) cells of the developing chick inner ear epithelium. RESULTS: Four different models that interlaced cellular patterning mechanisms in a variety of ways were examined and their output compared to the mosaic of sensory and supporting cells that develops in the chick inner ear sensory epithelium. The results show that: 1) no single patterning mechanism can create a 2-dimensional mosaic pattern of the regularity seen in the chick inner ear; 2) cell death was essential to generate the most regular mosaics, even through extensive cell death has not been reported for the developing basilar papilla; 3) a model that includes an iterative loop of lateral inhibition, programmed cell death and cell rearrangements driven by differential adhesion created mosaics of primary and secondary cells that are more regular than the basilar papilla; 4) this same model was much more robust to changes in homo- and heterotypic cell-cell adhesive differences than models that considered either fewer patterning mechanisms or single rather than iterative use of each mechanism. CONCLUSION: Patterning the embryo requires collaboration between multiple mechanisms that operate iteratively. Interlacing these mechanisms into feedback loops not only refines the output patterns, but also increases the robustness of patterning to varying initial cell states.