Cargando…

What are the benefits of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer's Disease: use of Population Impact Measures

BACKGROUND: The study aims to quantify the population impact of prescribing cholinesterase inhibitors to slow the cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and to compare with the benefit of treating hypertension to prevent the onset of AD. METHODS: Literature review to ascertain the preva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gammanpila, Udaya P, Burns, Alistair, Heller, Richard F, Purandare, Nitin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17986333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-7-25
_version_ 1782148431261728768
author Gammanpila, Udaya P
Burns, Alistair
Heller, Richard F
Purandare, Nitin
author_facet Gammanpila, Udaya P
Burns, Alistair
Heller, Richard F
Purandare, Nitin
author_sort Gammanpila, Udaya P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study aims to quantify the population impact of prescribing cholinesterase inhibitors to slow the cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and to compare with the benefit of treating hypertension to prevent the onset of AD. METHODS: Literature review to ascertain the prevalence of AD, benefits of interventions, analysis of local and national surveys to measure the current use of interventions in the relevant population and application of the relevant findings to calculate Population Impact Measures. The Number of Events Prevented in a Population (NEPP) by the intervention over a defined time period is calculated for a UK urban population in one Local Authority (population size 217,000). RESULTS: Treatment of all eligible patients with mild to moderate AD with Cholinesterase Inhibitors would prevent cognitive deterioration (measured by ADAS – cog scale) in 123.6 (95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 82.3, 169.1), 16.4 (95% CI 2.1, 31.2) would show a mild improvement (4 points or more on the ADAS – cog scale) and 2.6 (95% CI 0.2, 5.8) would show an improvement of 7 points or more over a period of 6 months. This would require the treatment of 406 patients with Cholinesterase Inhibitors. Increasing from the current treatment rate of 46% of eligible patients to 'best practice' level would prevent cognitive deterioration in 66.8 (95% CI 44.0, 92.6), 8.99 (95% CI 1.2, 16.8) and 1.4 (95% CI 0.11, 3.2) would improve by 4 and 7 points respectively on the ADAS – cog scale over 6 months. This would require the treatment of an extra 187 patients with Cholinesterase Inhibitors beyond current practice, at an additional annual direct drug cost of £187,000. Improving the treatment of hypertension from current practice by 20% could prevent 8.2 (95% CI 2.3, 16.8) incident cases of AD in the next year. This would require the treatment of an extra 2711 patients with antihypertensive drugs. CONCLUSION: Population Impact Measures are a new method to allow a demonstration of the magnitude of the benefit for the whole population following interventions. The use of drugs to slow cognitive decline, or to prevent AD by treating hypertension, can thus be assessed in a prioritisation exercise in competition with alternative use of resources.
format Text
id pubmed-2206022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22060222008-01-18 What are the benefits of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer's Disease: use of Population Impact Measures Gammanpila, Udaya P Burns, Alistair Heller, Richard F Purandare, Nitin BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The study aims to quantify the population impact of prescribing cholinesterase inhibitors to slow the cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and to compare with the benefit of treating hypertension to prevent the onset of AD. METHODS: Literature review to ascertain the prevalence of AD, benefits of interventions, analysis of local and national surveys to measure the current use of interventions in the relevant population and application of the relevant findings to calculate Population Impact Measures. The Number of Events Prevented in a Population (NEPP) by the intervention over a defined time period is calculated for a UK urban population in one Local Authority (population size 217,000). RESULTS: Treatment of all eligible patients with mild to moderate AD with Cholinesterase Inhibitors would prevent cognitive deterioration (measured by ADAS – cog scale) in 123.6 (95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 82.3, 169.1), 16.4 (95% CI 2.1, 31.2) would show a mild improvement (4 points or more on the ADAS – cog scale) and 2.6 (95% CI 0.2, 5.8) would show an improvement of 7 points or more over a period of 6 months. This would require the treatment of 406 patients with Cholinesterase Inhibitors. Increasing from the current treatment rate of 46% of eligible patients to 'best practice' level would prevent cognitive deterioration in 66.8 (95% CI 44.0, 92.6), 8.99 (95% CI 1.2, 16.8) and 1.4 (95% CI 0.11, 3.2) would improve by 4 and 7 points respectively on the ADAS – cog scale over 6 months. This would require the treatment of an extra 187 patients with Cholinesterase Inhibitors beyond current practice, at an additional annual direct drug cost of £187,000. Improving the treatment of hypertension from current practice by 20% could prevent 8.2 (95% CI 2.3, 16.8) incident cases of AD in the next year. This would require the treatment of an extra 2711 patients with antihypertensive drugs. CONCLUSION: Population Impact Measures are a new method to allow a demonstration of the magnitude of the benefit for the whole population following interventions. The use of drugs to slow cognitive decline, or to prevent AD by treating hypertension, can thus be assessed in a prioritisation exercise in competition with alternative use of resources. BioMed Central 2007-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2206022/ /pubmed/17986333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-7-25 Text en Copyright © 2007 Gammanpila et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gammanpila, Udaya P
Burns, Alistair
Heller, Richard F
Purandare, Nitin
What are the benefits of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer's Disease: use of Population Impact Measures
title What are the benefits of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer's Disease: use of Population Impact Measures
title_full What are the benefits of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer's Disease: use of Population Impact Measures
title_fullStr What are the benefits of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer's Disease: use of Population Impact Measures
title_full_unstemmed What are the benefits of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer's Disease: use of Population Impact Measures
title_short What are the benefits of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer's Disease: use of Population Impact Measures
title_sort what are the benefits of cognitive enhancers for alzheimer's disease: use of population impact measures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17986333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-7-25
work_keys_str_mv AT gammanpilaudayap whatarethebenefitsofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseuseofpopulationimpactmeasures
AT burnsalistair whatarethebenefitsofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseuseofpopulationimpactmeasures
AT hellerrichardf whatarethebenefitsofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseuseofpopulationimpactmeasures
AT purandarenitin whatarethebenefitsofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseuseofpopulationimpactmeasures