Cargando…

Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important?

Current treatment strategies aim to achieve clinical remission in order to prevent the long-term consequences of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Several composite indices are available to assess remission. All of them include joint counts as the assessment of the major 'organ' involved in RA, b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kapral, Theresa, Dernoschnig, Florian, Machold, Klaus P, Stamm, Tanja, Schoels, Monika, Smolen, Josef S, Aletaha, Daniel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17662115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar2270
_version_ 1782148457028386816
author Kapral, Theresa
Dernoschnig, Florian
Machold, Klaus P
Stamm, Tanja
Schoels, Monika
Smolen, Josef S
Aletaha, Daniel
author_facet Kapral, Theresa
Dernoschnig, Florian
Machold, Klaus P
Stamm, Tanja
Schoels, Monika
Smolen, Josef S
Aletaha, Daniel
author_sort Kapral, Theresa
collection PubMed
description Current treatment strategies aim to achieve clinical remission in order to prevent the long-term consequences of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Several composite indices are available to assess remission. All of them include joint counts as the assessment of the major 'organ' involved in RA, but some employ reduced joint counts, such as the 28-joint count, which excludes ankles and feet. The aim of the present study was to determine the relevance of excluding joints of the ankles and feet in the assessment of RA disease activity and remission. Using a longitudinal observational RA dataset, we analyzed 767 patients (80% female, 60% rheumatoid factor-positive), for whom joint counts had been recorded at 2,754 visits. We determined the number of affected joints by the 28-JC and the 32-JC, the latter including ankles and combined metatarso-phalangeal joints (as a block on each side). Several findings were supportive of the validity of the 28-joint count: (a) Absence of joint swelling on the 28-joint scale had a specificity of 98.1% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.1% for the absence of swelling also on the 32-joint scale. For absence of tender joints, the specificity and PPV were 96.1% and 91.7%, respectively. (b) Patients with swollen or tender joints in the 32-JC, despite no joint activity in the 28-JC, were clearly different with regard to other disease activity measures. In particular, the patient global assessment of disease activity was higher in these individuals. Thus, the difference in the joint count was not relevant for composite disease activity assessment. (c) The disease activity score based on 28 joints (DAS28) may reach levels higher than 2.6 in patients with feet swelling since these patients often have other findings that raise DAS28. (d) The frequency of remission did not change when the 28-JC was replaced by 32-JC in the composite indices. (e) The changes in joint activity over time were almost identical in longitudinal analysis. The assessment of the ankles and feet is an important part in the clinical evaluation of patients with RA. However, reduced joint counts are appropriate and valid tools for formal disease activity assessment, such as done in composite indices.
format Text
id pubmed-2206375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22063752008-01-19 Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important? Kapral, Theresa Dernoschnig, Florian Machold, Klaus P Stamm, Tanja Schoels, Monika Smolen, Josef S Aletaha, Daniel Arthritis Res Ther Research Article Current treatment strategies aim to achieve clinical remission in order to prevent the long-term consequences of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Several composite indices are available to assess remission. All of them include joint counts as the assessment of the major 'organ' involved in RA, but some employ reduced joint counts, such as the 28-joint count, which excludes ankles and feet. The aim of the present study was to determine the relevance of excluding joints of the ankles and feet in the assessment of RA disease activity and remission. Using a longitudinal observational RA dataset, we analyzed 767 patients (80% female, 60% rheumatoid factor-positive), for whom joint counts had been recorded at 2,754 visits. We determined the number of affected joints by the 28-JC and the 32-JC, the latter including ankles and combined metatarso-phalangeal joints (as a block on each side). Several findings were supportive of the validity of the 28-joint count: (a) Absence of joint swelling on the 28-joint scale had a specificity of 98.1% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.1% for the absence of swelling also on the 32-joint scale. For absence of tender joints, the specificity and PPV were 96.1% and 91.7%, respectively. (b) Patients with swollen or tender joints in the 32-JC, despite no joint activity in the 28-JC, were clearly different with regard to other disease activity measures. In particular, the patient global assessment of disease activity was higher in these individuals. Thus, the difference in the joint count was not relevant for composite disease activity assessment. (c) The disease activity score based on 28 joints (DAS28) may reach levels higher than 2.6 in patients with feet swelling since these patients often have other findings that raise DAS28. (d) The frequency of remission did not change when the 28-JC was replaced by 32-JC in the composite indices. (e) The changes in joint activity over time were almost identical in longitudinal analysis. The assessment of the ankles and feet is an important part in the clinical evaluation of patients with RA. However, reduced joint counts are appropriate and valid tools for formal disease activity assessment, such as done in composite indices. BioMed Central 2007 2007-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2206375/ /pubmed/17662115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar2270 Text en Copyright © 2007 Kapral et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kapral, Theresa
Dernoschnig, Florian
Machold, Klaus P
Stamm, Tanja
Schoels, Monika
Smolen, Josef S
Aletaha, Daniel
Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important?
title Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important?
title_full Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important?
title_fullStr Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important?
title_full_unstemmed Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important?
title_short Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important?
title_sort remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17662115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar2270
work_keys_str_mv AT kapraltheresa remissionbycompositescoresinrheumatoidarthritisareanklesandfeetimportant
AT dernoschnigflorian remissionbycompositescoresinrheumatoidarthritisareanklesandfeetimportant
AT macholdklausp remissionbycompositescoresinrheumatoidarthritisareanklesandfeetimportant
AT stammtanja remissionbycompositescoresinrheumatoidarthritisareanklesandfeetimportant
AT schoelsmonika remissionbycompositescoresinrheumatoidarthritisareanklesandfeetimportant
AT smolenjosefs remissionbycompositescoresinrheumatoidarthritisareanklesandfeetimportant
AT aletahadaniel remissionbycompositescoresinrheumatoidarthritisareanklesandfeetimportant