Cargando…

Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care

Increasing evidence suggests that high case volume is associated with improved outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). Potential explanations for the volume–outcome relationship include selective referral, clinical experience and organizational factors common to high-volume ICUs. Distinguishing b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kahn, Jeremy M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17493293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5776
_version_ 1782148460807454720
author Kahn, Jeremy M
author_facet Kahn, Jeremy M
author_sort Kahn, Jeremy M
collection PubMed
description Increasing evidence suggests that high case volume is associated with improved outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). Potential explanations for the volume–outcome relationship include selective referral, clinical experience and organizational factors common to high-volume ICUs. Distinguishing between these explanations has important health policy implications, because outcomes at low-volume ICUs could be improved either by exporting best practices found at high-volume centers or by regionalizing adult critical care – two very different care strategies. Future research efforts should be directed at better characterizing the process of care in high-volume ICUs and exploring the feasibility of creating a regionalized system of care.
format Text
id pubmed-2206391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22063912008-01-19 Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care Kahn, Jeremy M Crit Care Commentary Increasing evidence suggests that high case volume is associated with improved outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). Potential explanations for the volume–outcome relationship include selective referral, clinical experience and organizational factors common to high-volume ICUs. Distinguishing between these explanations has important health policy implications, because outcomes at low-volume ICUs could be improved either by exporting best practices found at high-volume centers or by regionalizing adult critical care – two very different care strategies. Future research efforts should be directed at better characterizing the process of care in high-volume ICUs and exploring the feasibility of creating a regionalized system of care. BioMed Central 2007 2007-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2206391/ /pubmed/17493293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5776 Text en Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Kahn, Jeremy M
Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care
title Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care
title_full Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care
title_fullStr Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care
title_full_unstemmed Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care
title_short Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care
title_sort volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17493293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5776
work_keys_str_mv AT kahnjeremym volumeoutcomeandtheorganizationofintensivecare