Cargando…
Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care
Increasing evidence suggests that high case volume is associated with improved outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). Potential explanations for the volume–outcome relationship include selective referral, clinical experience and organizational factors common to high-volume ICUs. Distinguishing b...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17493293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5776 |
_version_ | 1782148460807454720 |
---|---|
author | Kahn, Jeremy M |
author_facet | Kahn, Jeremy M |
author_sort | Kahn, Jeremy M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increasing evidence suggests that high case volume is associated with improved outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). Potential explanations for the volume–outcome relationship include selective referral, clinical experience and organizational factors common to high-volume ICUs. Distinguishing between these explanations has important health policy implications, because outcomes at low-volume ICUs could be improved either by exporting best practices found at high-volume centers or by regionalizing adult critical care – two very different care strategies. Future research efforts should be directed at better characterizing the process of care in high-volume ICUs and exploring the feasibility of creating a regionalized system of care. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2206391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22063912008-01-19 Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care Kahn, Jeremy M Crit Care Commentary Increasing evidence suggests that high case volume is associated with improved outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). Potential explanations for the volume–outcome relationship include selective referral, clinical experience and organizational factors common to high-volume ICUs. Distinguishing between these explanations has important health policy implications, because outcomes at low-volume ICUs could be improved either by exporting best practices found at high-volume centers or by regionalizing adult critical care – two very different care strategies. Future research efforts should be directed at better characterizing the process of care in high-volume ICUs and exploring the feasibility of creating a regionalized system of care. BioMed Central 2007 2007-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2206391/ /pubmed/17493293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5776 Text en Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Kahn, Jeremy M Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care |
title | Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care |
title_full | Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care |
title_fullStr | Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care |
title_full_unstemmed | Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care |
title_short | Volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care |
title_sort | volume, outcome, and the organization of intensive care |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17493293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5776 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kahnjeremym volumeoutcomeandtheorganizationofintensivecare |