Cargando…
The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we?
In daily clinical practice the diagnosis of sepsis is imprecise and often delayed. In part, this is because the diagnosis is based on a clinical picture of signs and symptoms. This basis has significant implications, as there is evidence that early events in sepsis may determine outcome. A more obje...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17608957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5943 |
_version_ | 1782148470312796160 |
---|---|
author | Levy, Mitchell M |
author_facet | Levy, Mitchell M |
author_sort | Levy, Mitchell M |
collection | PubMed |
description | In daily clinical practice the diagnosis of sepsis is imprecise and often delayed. In part, this is because the diagnosis is based on a clinical picture of signs and symptoms. This basis has significant implications, as there is evidence that early events in sepsis may determine outcome. A more objective set of measurements for confirming the diagnosis of sepsis has long been sought. Several sepsis biomarkers have been evaluated and shown to have a moderate degree of sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing the presence of bacterial infection. Efforts are now being directed toward evaluating the utility of biomarker profiles, containing multiple markers, for risk assessment and diagnosis in patients with suspected sepsis. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2206431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22064312008-01-19 The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we? Levy, Mitchell M Crit Care Commentary In daily clinical practice the diagnosis of sepsis is imprecise and often delayed. In part, this is because the diagnosis is based on a clinical picture of signs and symptoms. This basis has significant implications, as there is evidence that early events in sepsis may determine outcome. A more objective set of measurements for confirming the diagnosis of sepsis has long been sought. Several sepsis biomarkers have been evaluated and shown to have a moderate degree of sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing the presence of bacterial infection. Efforts are now being directed toward evaluating the utility of biomarker profiles, containing multiple markers, for risk assessment and diagnosis in patients with suspected sepsis. BioMed Central 2007 2007-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2206431/ /pubmed/17608957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5943 Text en Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Levy, Mitchell M The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we? |
title | The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we? |
title_full | The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we? |
title_fullStr | The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we? |
title_full_unstemmed | The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we? |
title_short | The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we? |
title_sort | electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17608957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5943 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levymitchellm theelectrocardiogramforsepsishowclosearewe AT levymitchellm electrocardiogramforsepsishowclosearewe |