Cargando…

The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we?

In daily clinical practice the diagnosis of sepsis is imprecise and often delayed. In part, this is because the diagnosis is based on a clinical picture of signs and symptoms. This basis has significant implications, as there is evidence that early events in sepsis may determine outcome. A more obje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Levy, Mitchell M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17608957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5943
_version_ 1782148470312796160
author Levy, Mitchell M
author_facet Levy, Mitchell M
author_sort Levy, Mitchell M
collection PubMed
description In daily clinical practice the diagnosis of sepsis is imprecise and often delayed. In part, this is because the diagnosis is based on a clinical picture of signs and symptoms. This basis has significant implications, as there is evidence that early events in sepsis may determine outcome. A more objective set of measurements for confirming the diagnosis of sepsis has long been sought. Several sepsis biomarkers have been evaluated and shown to have a moderate degree of sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing the presence of bacterial infection. Efforts are now being directed toward evaluating the utility of biomarker profiles, containing multiple markers, for risk assessment and diagnosis in patients with suspected sepsis.
format Text
id pubmed-2206431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22064312008-01-19 The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we? Levy, Mitchell M Crit Care Commentary In daily clinical practice the diagnosis of sepsis is imprecise and often delayed. In part, this is because the diagnosis is based on a clinical picture of signs and symptoms. This basis has significant implications, as there is evidence that early events in sepsis may determine outcome. A more objective set of measurements for confirming the diagnosis of sepsis has long been sought. Several sepsis biomarkers have been evaluated and shown to have a moderate degree of sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing the presence of bacterial infection. Efforts are now being directed toward evaluating the utility of biomarker profiles, containing multiple markers, for risk assessment and diagnosis in patients with suspected sepsis. BioMed Central 2007 2007-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2206431/ /pubmed/17608957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5943 Text en Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Levy, Mitchell M
The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we?
title The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we?
title_full The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we?
title_fullStr The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we?
title_full_unstemmed The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we?
title_short The electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we?
title_sort electrocardiogram for sepsis: how close are we?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17608957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5943
work_keys_str_mv AT levymitchellm theelectrocardiogramforsepsishowclosearewe
AT levymitchellm electrocardiogramforsepsishowclosearewe