Cargando…

Comparison of cooling methods to induce and maintain normo- and hypothermia in intensive care unit patients: a prospective intervention study

BACKGROUND: Temperature management is used with increased frequency as a tool to mitigate neurological injury. Although frequently used, little is known about the optimal cooling methods for inducing and maintaining controlled normo- and hypothermia in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this study we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W, Ezzahti, Mustapha, Gerritsen, Aico, van der Hoeven, Johannes G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17718920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6104
_version_ 1782148483512270848
author Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W
Ezzahti, Mustapha
Gerritsen, Aico
van der Hoeven, Johannes G
author_facet Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W
Ezzahti, Mustapha
Gerritsen, Aico
van der Hoeven, Johannes G
author_sort Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Temperature management is used with increased frequency as a tool to mitigate neurological injury. Although frequently used, little is known about the optimal cooling methods for inducing and maintaining controlled normo- and hypothermia in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this study we compared the efficacy of several commercially available cooling devices for temperature management in ICU patients with various types of neurological injury. METHODS: Fifty adult ICU patients with an indication for controlled mild hypothermia or strict normothermia were prospectively enrolled. Ten patients in each group were assigned in consecutive order to conventional cooling (that is, rapid infusion of 30 ml/kg cold fluids, ice and/or coldpacks), cooling with water circulating blankets, air circulating blankets, water circulating gel-coated pads and an intravascular heat exchange system. In all patients the speed of cooling (expressed as°C/h) was measured. After the target temperature was reached, we measured the percentage of time the patient's temperature was 0.2°C below or above the target range. Rates of temperature decline over time were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance. Differences between groups were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Temperature decline was significantly higher with the water-circulating blankets (1.33 ± 0.63°C/h), gel-pads (1.04 ± 0.14°C/h) and intravascular cooling (1.46 ± 0.42°C/h) compared to conventional cooling (0.31 ± 0.23°C/h) and the air-circulating blankets (0.18 ± 0.2°C/h) (p < 0.01). After the target temperature was reached, the intravascular cooling device was 11.2 ± 18.7% of the time out of range, which was significantly less compared to all other methods. CONCLUSION: Cooling with water-circulating blankets, gel-pads and intravascular cooling is more efficient compared to conventional cooling and air-circulating blankets. The intravascular cooling system is most reliable to maintain a stable temperature.
format Text
id pubmed-2206487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22064872008-01-19 Comparison of cooling methods to induce and maintain normo- and hypothermia in intensive care unit patients: a prospective intervention study Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W Ezzahti, Mustapha Gerritsen, Aico van der Hoeven, Johannes G Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Temperature management is used with increased frequency as a tool to mitigate neurological injury. Although frequently used, little is known about the optimal cooling methods for inducing and maintaining controlled normo- and hypothermia in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this study we compared the efficacy of several commercially available cooling devices for temperature management in ICU patients with various types of neurological injury. METHODS: Fifty adult ICU patients with an indication for controlled mild hypothermia or strict normothermia were prospectively enrolled. Ten patients in each group were assigned in consecutive order to conventional cooling (that is, rapid infusion of 30 ml/kg cold fluids, ice and/or coldpacks), cooling with water circulating blankets, air circulating blankets, water circulating gel-coated pads and an intravascular heat exchange system. In all patients the speed of cooling (expressed as°C/h) was measured. After the target temperature was reached, we measured the percentage of time the patient's temperature was 0.2°C below or above the target range. Rates of temperature decline over time were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance. Differences between groups were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Temperature decline was significantly higher with the water-circulating blankets (1.33 ± 0.63°C/h), gel-pads (1.04 ± 0.14°C/h) and intravascular cooling (1.46 ± 0.42°C/h) compared to conventional cooling (0.31 ± 0.23°C/h) and the air-circulating blankets (0.18 ± 0.2°C/h) (p < 0.01). After the target temperature was reached, the intravascular cooling device was 11.2 ± 18.7% of the time out of range, which was significantly less compared to all other methods. CONCLUSION: Cooling with water-circulating blankets, gel-pads and intravascular cooling is more efficient compared to conventional cooling and air-circulating blankets. The intravascular cooling system is most reliable to maintain a stable temperature. BioMed Central 2007 2007-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2206487/ /pubmed/17718920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6104 Text en Copyright © 2007 Hoedemaekers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W
Ezzahti, Mustapha
Gerritsen, Aico
van der Hoeven, Johannes G
Comparison of cooling methods to induce and maintain normo- and hypothermia in intensive care unit patients: a prospective intervention study
title Comparison of cooling methods to induce and maintain normo- and hypothermia in intensive care unit patients: a prospective intervention study
title_full Comparison of cooling methods to induce and maintain normo- and hypothermia in intensive care unit patients: a prospective intervention study
title_fullStr Comparison of cooling methods to induce and maintain normo- and hypothermia in intensive care unit patients: a prospective intervention study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of cooling methods to induce and maintain normo- and hypothermia in intensive care unit patients: a prospective intervention study
title_short Comparison of cooling methods to induce and maintain normo- and hypothermia in intensive care unit patients: a prospective intervention study
title_sort comparison of cooling methods to induce and maintain normo- and hypothermia in intensive care unit patients: a prospective intervention study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17718920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6104
work_keys_str_mv AT hoedemaekerscorneliaw comparisonofcoolingmethodstoinduceandmaintainnormoandhypothermiainintensivecareunitpatientsaprospectiveinterventionstudy
AT ezzahtimustapha comparisonofcoolingmethodstoinduceandmaintainnormoandhypothermiainintensivecareunitpatientsaprospectiveinterventionstudy
AT gerritsenaico comparisonofcoolingmethodstoinduceandmaintainnormoandhypothermiainintensivecareunitpatientsaprospectiveinterventionstudy
AT vanderhoevenjohannesg comparisonofcoolingmethodstoinduceandmaintainnormoandhypothermiainintensivecareunitpatientsaprospectiveinterventionstudy