Cargando…
Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications
Sleep disturbances are common in critically ill patients and have been characterised by numerous studies using polysomnography. Issues regarding patient populations, monitoring duration and timing (nocturnal versus continuous), as well as practical problems encountered in critical care studies using...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17764582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5966 |
_version_ | 1782148487805140992 |
---|---|
author | Bourne, Richard S Minelli, Cosetta Mills, Gary H Kandler, Rosalind |
author_facet | Bourne, Richard S Minelli, Cosetta Mills, Gary H Kandler, Rosalind |
author_sort | Bourne, Richard S |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sleep disturbances are common in critically ill patients and have been characterised by numerous studies using polysomnography. Issues regarding patient populations, monitoring duration and timing (nocturnal versus continuous), as well as practical problems encountered in critical care studies using polysomnography are considered with regard to future interventional studies on sleep. Polysomnography is the gold standard in objectively measuring the quality and quantity of sleep. However, it is difficult to undertake, particularly in patients recovering from critical illness in an acute-care area. Therefore, other objective (actigraphy and bispectral index) and subjective (nurse or patient assessment) methods have been used in other critical care studies. Each of these techniques has its own particular advantages and disadvantages. We use data from an interventional study to compare agreement between four of these alternative techniques in the measurement of nocturnal sleep quantity. Recommendations for further developments in sleep monitoring techniques for research and clinical application are made. Also, methodological problems in studies validating various sleep measurement techniques are explored. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47578325. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2206505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22065052008-01-19 Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications Bourne, Richard S Minelli, Cosetta Mills, Gary H Kandler, Rosalind Crit Care Review Sleep disturbances are common in critically ill patients and have been characterised by numerous studies using polysomnography. Issues regarding patient populations, monitoring duration and timing (nocturnal versus continuous), as well as practical problems encountered in critical care studies using polysomnography are considered with regard to future interventional studies on sleep. Polysomnography is the gold standard in objectively measuring the quality and quantity of sleep. However, it is difficult to undertake, particularly in patients recovering from critical illness in an acute-care area. Therefore, other objective (actigraphy and bispectral index) and subjective (nurse or patient assessment) methods have been used in other critical care studies. Each of these techniques has its own particular advantages and disadvantages. We use data from an interventional study to compare agreement between four of these alternative techniques in the measurement of nocturnal sleep quantity. Recommendations for further developments in sleep monitoring techniques for research and clinical application are made. Also, methodological problems in studies validating various sleep measurement techniques are explored. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47578325. BioMed Central 2007 2007-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2206505/ /pubmed/17764582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5966 Text en Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Review Bourne, Richard S Minelli, Cosetta Mills, Gary H Kandler, Rosalind Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications |
title | Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications |
title_full | Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications |
title_fullStr | Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications |
title_short | Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications |
title_sort | clinical review: sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17764582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bournerichards clinicalreviewsleepmeasurementincriticalcarepatientsresearchandclinicalimplications AT minellicosetta clinicalreviewsleepmeasurementincriticalcarepatientsresearchandclinicalimplications AT millsgaryh clinicalreviewsleepmeasurementincriticalcarepatientsresearchandclinicalimplications AT kandlerrosalind clinicalreviewsleepmeasurementincriticalcarepatientsresearchandclinicalimplications |