Cargando…

Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications

Sleep disturbances are common in critically ill patients and have been characterised by numerous studies using polysomnography. Issues regarding patient populations, monitoring duration and timing (nocturnal versus continuous), as well as practical problems encountered in critical care studies using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourne, Richard S, Minelli, Cosetta, Mills, Gary H, Kandler, Rosalind
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17764582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5966
_version_ 1782148487805140992
author Bourne, Richard S
Minelli, Cosetta
Mills, Gary H
Kandler, Rosalind
author_facet Bourne, Richard S
Minelli, Cosetta
Mills, Gary H
Kandler, Rosalind
author_sort Bourne, Richard S
collection PubMed
description Sleep disturbances are common in critically ill patients and have been characterised by numerous studies using polysomnography. Issues regarding patient populations, monitoring duration and timing (nocturnal versus continuous), as well as practical problems encountered in critical care studies using polysomnography are considered with regard to future interventional studies on sleep. Polysomnography is the gold standard in objectively measuring the quality and quantity of sleep. However, it is difficult to undertake, particularly in patients recovering from critical illness in an acute-care area. Therefore, other objective (actigraphy and bispectral index) and subjective (nurse or patient assessment) methods have been used in other critical care studies. Each of these techniques has its own particular advantages and disadvantages. We use data from an interventional study to compare agreement between four of these alternative techniques in the measurement of nocturnal sleep quantity. Recommendations for further developments in sleep monitoring techniques for research and clinical application are made. Also, methodological problems in studies validating various sleep measurement techniques are explored. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47578325.
format Text
id pubmed-2206505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22065052008-01-19 Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications Bourne, Richard S Minelli, Cosetta Mills, Gary H Kandler, Rosalind Crit Care Review Sleep disturbances are common in critically ill patients and have been characterised by numerous studies using polysomnography. Issues regarding patient populations, monitoring duration and timing (nocturnal versus continuous), as well as practical problems encountered in critical care studies using polysomnography are considered with regard to future interventional studies on sleep. Polysomnography is the gold standard in objectively measuring the quality and quantity of sleep. However, it is difficult to undertake, particularly in patients recovering from critical illness in an acute-care area. Therefore, other objective (actigraphy and bispectral index) and subjective (nurse or patient assessment) methods have been used in other critical care studies. Each of these techniques has its own particular advantages and disadvantages. We use data from an interventional study to compare agreement between four of these alternative techniques in the measurement of nocturnal sleep quantity. Recommendations for further developments in sleep monitoring techniques for research and clinical application are made. Also, methodological problems in studies validating various sleep measurement techniques are explored. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47578325. BioMed Central 2007 2007-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2206505/ /pubmed/17764582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5966 Text en Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Bourne, Richard S
Minelli, Cosetta
Mills, Gary H
Kandler, Rosalind
Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications
title Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications
title_full Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications
title_fullStr Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications
title_full_unstemmed Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications
title_short Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications
title_sort clinical review: sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17764582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5966
work_keys_str_mv AT bournerichards clinicalreviewsleepmeasurementincriticalcarepatientsresearchandclinicalimplications
AT minellicosetta clinicalreviewsleepmeasurementincriticalcarepatientsresearchandclinicalimplications
AT millsgaryh clinicalreviewsleepmeasurementincriticalcarepatientsresearchandclinicalimplications
AT kandlerrosalind clinicalreviewsleepmeasurementincriticalcarepatientsresearchandclinicalimplications