Cargando…
Recently published papers: Delivery, volume and outcome – what is best for our patient?
Many studies have demonstrated that prompt appropriate treatment for the critically ill patient improves outcome. Moving patients to the best place for instituting care, however, is not always associated with improved outcome. Recent studies on delivering patients to the best place for treatment as...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17697392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6082 |
_version_ | 1782148488572698624 |
---|---|
author | Forni, Lui G |
author_facet | Forni, Lui G |
author_sort | Forni, Lui G |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many studies have demonstrated that prompt appropriate treatment for the critically ill patient improves outcome. Moving patients to the best place for instituting care, however, is not always associated with improved outcome. Recent studies on delivering patients to the best place for treatment as well as further work on the effects of volume are discussed. Finally, a large retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes of patients treated with continuous venovenous haemofiltration or intermittent haemodialysis is outlined. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2206508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22065082008-01-19 Recently published papers: Delivery, volume and outcome – what is best for our patient? Forni, Lui G Crit Care Commentary Many studies have demonstrated that prompt appropriate treatment for the critically ill patient improves outcome. Moving patients to the best place for instituting care, however, is not always associated with improved outcome. Recent studies on delivering patients to the best place for treatment as well as further work on the effects of volume are discussed. Finally, a large retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes of patients treated with continuous venovenous haemofiltration or intermittent haemodialysis is outlined. BioMed Central 2007 2007-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2206508/ /pubmed/17697392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6082 Text en Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Forni, Lui G Recently published papers: Delivery, volume and outcome – what is best for our patient? |
title | Recently published papers: Delivery, volume and outcome – what is best for our patient? |
title_full | Recently published papers: Delivery, volume and outcome – what is best for our patient? |
title_fullStr | Recently published papers: Delivery, volume and outcome – what is best for our patient? |
title_full_unstemmed | Recently published papers: Delivery, volume and outcome – what is best for our patient? |
title_short | Recently published papers: Delivery, volume and outcome – what is best for our patient? |
title_sort | recently published papers: delivery, volume and outcome – what is best for our patient? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17697392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forniluig recentlypublishedpapersdeliveryvolumeandoutcomewhatisbestforourpatient |