Cargando…

A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock

INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence suggests that early, aggressive resuscitation in patients with septic shock reduces mortality. The objective of this survey was to characterize reported resuscitation practices of Canadian physicians caring for adult critically ill patients with early septic shock. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McIntyre, Lauralyn A, Hébert, Paul C, Fergusson, Dean, Cook, Deborah J, Aziz, Ashique
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17623059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5962
_version_ 1782148490915217408
author McIntyre, Lauralyn A
Hébert, Paul C
Fergusson, Dean
Cook, Deborah J
Aziz, Ashique
author_facet McIntyre, Lauralyn A
Hébert, Paul C
Fergusson, Dean
Cook, Deborah J
Aziz, Ashique
author_sort McIntyre, Lauralyn A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence suggests that early, aggressive resuscitation in patients with septic shock reduces mortality. The objective of this survey was to characterize reported resuscitation practices of Canadian physicians caring for adult critically ill patients with early septic shock. METHODS: A scenario-based self-administered national survey was sent out to Canadian critical care physicians. One hypothetical scenario was developed to obtain information on several aspects of resuscitation in early septic shock, including monitoring and resuscitation end-points, fluid administration, red blood cell transfusion triggers, and use of inotropes. The sampling frame was physician members of Canadian national and provincial critical care societies. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 232 out of 355 (65.3%). Medicine was the most common primary specialty (60.0%), most respondents had practiced for 6 to 10 years (30.0%), and 82.0% were male. The following monitoring devices/parameters were reported as used/measured 'often' or 'always' by at least 89% of respondents: oxygen saturation (100%), Foley catheters (100%), arterial blood pressure lines (96.6%), telemetry (94.3%), and central venous pressure (89.2%). Continuous monitoring of central venous oxygen saturation was employed 'often' or 'always' by 9.8% of respondents. The two most commonly cited resuscitation end-points were urine output (96.5%) and blood pressure (91.8%). Over half of respondents used normal saline (84.5%), Ringers lactate (52.2%), and pentastarch (51.3%) 'often' or 'always' for early fluid resuscitation. In contrast, 5% and 25% albumin solutions were cited as used 'often' or 'always' by 3.9% and 1.3% of respondents, respectively. Compared with internists, surgeons and anesthesiologists (odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 9.8 (2.9 to 32.7) and 3.8 (1.7 to 8.7), respectively) reported greater use of Ringers lactate. In the setting of a low central venous oxygen saturation, 52.5% of respondents reported use of inotropic support 'often' or 'always'. Only 7.6% of physicians stated they would use a red blood cell transfusion trigger of 100 g/l to optimize oxygen delivery further. CONCLUSION: Our survey results suggest that there is substantial practice variation in the resuscitation of adult patients with early septic shock. More randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal approach.
format Text
id pubmed-2206518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22065182008-01-19 A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock McIntyre, Lauralyn A Hébert, Paul C Fergusson, Dean Cook, Deborah J Aziz, Ashique Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence suggests that early, aggressive resuscitation in patients with septic shock reduces mortality. The objective of this survey was to characterize reported resuscitation practices of Canadian physicians caring for adult critically ill patients with early septic shock. METHODS: A scenario-based self-administered national survey was sent out to Canadian critical care physicians. One hypothetical scenario was developed to obtain information on several aspects of resuscitation in early septic shock, including monitoring and resuscitation end-points, fluid administration, red blood cell transfusion triggers, and use of inotropes. The sampling frame was physician members of Canadian national and provincial critical care societies. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 232 out of 355 (65.3%). Medicine was the most common primary specialty (60.0%), most respondents had practiced for 6 to 10 years (30.0%), and 82.0% were male. The following monitoring devices/parameters were reported as used/measured 'often' or 'always' by at least 89% of respondents: oxygen saturation (100%), Foley catheters (100%), arterial blood pressure lines (96.6%), telemetry (94.3%), and central venous pressure (89.2%). Continuous monitoring of central venous oxygen saturation was employed 'often' or 'always' by 9.8% of respondents. The two most commonly cited resuscitation end-points were urine output (96.5%) and blood pressure (91.8%). Over half of respondents used normal saline (84.5%), Ringers lactate (52.2%), and pentastarch (51.3%) 'often' or 'always' for early fluid resuscitation. In contrast, 5% and 25% albumin solutions were cited as used 'often' or 'always' by 3.9% and 1.3% of respondents, respectively. Compared with internists, surgeons and anesthesiologists (odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 9.8 (2.9 to 32.7) and 3.8 (1.7 to 8.7), respectively) reported greater use of Ringers lactate. In the setting of a low central venous oxygen saturation, 52.5% of respondents reported use of inotropic support 'often' or 'always'. Only 7.6% of physicians stated they would use a red blood cell transfusion trigger of 100 g/l to optimize oxygen delivery further. CONCLUSION: Our survey results suggest that there is substantial practice variation in the resuscitation of adult patients with early septic shock. More randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal approach. BioMed Central 2007 2007-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2206518/ /pubmed/17623059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5962 Text en Copyright © 2007 McIntyre et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
McIntyre, Lauralyn A
Hébert, Paul C
Fergusson, Dean
Cook, Deborah J
Aziz, Ashique
A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock
title A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock
title_full A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock
title_fullStr A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock
title_full_unstemmed A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock
title_short A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock
title_sort survey of canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2206518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17623059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5962
work_keys_str_mv AT mcintyrelauralyna asurveyofcanadianintensivistsresuscitationpracticesinearlysepticshock
AT hebertpaulc asurveyofcanadianintensivistsresuscitationpracticesinearlysepticshock
AT fergussondean asurveyofcanadianintensivistsresuscitationpracticesinearlysepticshock
AT cookdeborahj asurveyofcanadianintensivistsresuscitationpracticesinearlysepticshock
AT azizashique asurveyofcanadianintensivistsresuscitationpracticesinearlysepticshock
AT asurveyofcanadianintensivistsresuscitationpracticesinearlysepticshock
AT mcintyrelauralyna surveyofcanadianintensivistsresuscitationpracticesinearlysepticshock
AT hebertpaulc surveyofcanadianintensivistsresuscitationpracticesinearlysepticshock
AT fergussondean surveyofcanadianintensivistsresuscitationpracticesinearlysepticshock
AT cookdeborahj surveyofcanadianintensivistsresuscitationpracticesinearlysepticshock
AT azizashique surveyofcanadianintensivistsresuscitationpracticesinearlysepticshock
AT surveyofcanadianintensivistsresuscitationpracticesinearlysepticshock