Cargando…
Malaria control in Malawi: are the poor being served?
BACKGROUND: In Africa, national governments and international organizations are focusing on rapidly "scaling up" malaria control interventions to at least 60 percent of vulnerable populations. The potential health and economic benefits of "scaling up" will depend on the equitable...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2216010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18053158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-6-22 |
_version_ | 1782149091468247040 |
---|---|
author | Mathanga, Don P Bowie, Cameron |
author_facet | Mathanga, Don P Bowie, Cameron |
author_sort | Mathanga, Don P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Africa, national governments and international organizations are focusing on rapidly "scaling up" malaria control interventions to at least 60 percent of vulnerable populations. The potential health and economic benefits of "scaling up" will depend on the equitable access to malaria control measures by the poor. This paper analyses the present inequalities in access to malaria interventions in Malawi. METHODS: Equity in access to malaria control measures was assessed using the Malawi Demographic Health Survey (DHS) 2000 and the 2004 national survey on malaria control. Utilisation of malaria control methods was compared across the wealth quintiles, to determine whether the poor were being reached with malaria control measures. RESULTS: Overall ITN coverage increased from 5% in 2000 to 35% in 2004. However, there was a disproportionate concentration of ITNs amongst the least poor compared to the poorest group. Effective treatment of fever remains unacceptably low with only 17% of the under-five children being promptly treated with an effective antimalarial drug. And only 29 percent of pregnant women received the recommended dose of at least two doses during the pregnancy. No income related inequalities were associated with prompt treatment and IPT use. CONCLUSION: The present distribution strategies for ITNs are not addressing the needs of the vulnerable groups, especially the poor. Increasing access to ITNs by the poor will require innovative distribution models which deliberately target the poorest of the poor. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2216010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22160102008-01-29 Malaria control in Malawi: are the poor being served? Mathanga, Don P Bowie, Cameron Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: In Africa, national governments and international organizations are focusing on rapidly "scaling up" malaria control interventions to at least 60 percent of vulnerable populations. The potential health and economic benefits of "scaling up" will depend on the equitable access to malaria control measures by the poor. This paper analyses the present inequalities in access to malaria interventions in Malawi. METHODS: Equity in access to malaria control measures was assessed using the Malawi Demographic Health Survey (DHS) 2000 and the 2004 national survey on malaria control. Utilisation of malaria control methods was compared across the wealth quintiles, to determine whether the poor were being reached with malaria control measures. RESULTS: Overall ITN coverage increased from 5% in 2000 to 35% in 2004. However, there was a disproportionate concentration of ITNs amongst the least poor compared to the poorest group. Effective treatment of fever remains unacceptably low with only 17% of the under-five children being promptly treated with an effective antimalarial drug. And only 29 percent of pregnant women received the recommended dose of at least two doses during the pregnancy. No income related inequalities were associated with prompt treatment and IPT use. CONCLUSION: The present distribution strategies for ITNs are not addressing the needs of the vulnerable groups, especially the poor. Increasing access to ITNs by the poor will require innovative distribution models which deliberately target the poorest of the poor. BioMed Central 2007-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2216010/ /pubmed/18053158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-6-22 Text en Copyright © 2007 Mathanga and Bowie; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Mathanga, Don P Bowie, Cameron Malaria control in Malawi: are the poor being served? |
title | Malaria control in Malawi: are the poor being served? |
title_full | Malaria control in Malawi: are the poor being served? |
title_fullStr | Malaria control in Malawi: are the poor being served? |
title_full_unstemmed | Malaria control in Malawi: are the poor being served? |
title_short | Malaria control in Malawi: are the poor being served? |
title_sort | malaria control in malawi: are the poor being served? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2216010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18053158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-6-22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathangadonp malariacontrolinmalawiarethepoorbeingserved AT bowiecameron malariacontrolinmalawiarethepoorbeingserved |