Cargando…

Inhibition of the Collapse of the Shaker K(+) Conductance by Specific Scorpion Toxins

The Shaker B K(+) conductance (G(K)) collapses when the channels are closed (deactivated) in Na(+) solutions that lack K(+) ions. Also, it is known that external TEA (TEA(o)) impedes the collapse of G(K) (Gómez-Lagunas, F. 1997. J. Physiol. 499:3–15; Gómez-Lagunas, F. 2001. J. Gen. Physiol. 118:639–...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gómez-Lagunas, Froylan, Batista, Cesar V.F., Olamendi-Portugal, Timoteo, Ramírez-Domínguez, Martha E., Possani, Lourival D.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2217447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14981137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200308871
Descripción
Sumario:The Shaker B K(+) conductance (G(K)) collapses when the channels are closed (deactivated) in Na(+) solutions that lack K(+) ions. Also, it is known that external TEA (TEA(o)) impedes the collapse of G(K) (Gómez-Lagunas, F. 1997. J. Physiol. 499:3–15; Gómez-Lagunas, F. 2001. J. Gen. Physiol. 118:639–648), and that channel block by TEA(o) and scorpion toxins are two mutually exclusive events (Goldstein, S.A.N., and C. Miller. 1993. Biophys. J. 65:1613–1619). Therefore, we tested the ability of scorpion toxins to inhibit the collapse of G(K) in 0 K(+). We have found that these toxins are not uniform regarding the capacity to protect G(K). Those toxins, whose binding to the channels is destabilized by external K(+), are also effective inhibitors of the collapse of G(K). In addition to K(+), other externally added cations also destabilize toxin block, with an effectiveness that does not match the selectivity sequence of K(+) channels. The inhibition of the drop of G(K) follows a saturation relationship with [toxin], which is fitted well by the Michaelis-Menten equation, with an apparent Kd bigger than that of block of the K(+) current. However, another plausible model is also presented and compared with the Michaelis-Menten model. The observations suggest that those toxins that protect G(K) in 0 K(+) do so by interacting either with the most external K(+) binding site of the selectivity filter (suggesting that the K(+) occupancy of only that site of the pore may be enough to preserve G(K)) or with sites capable of binding K(+) located in the outer vestibule of the pore, above the selectivity filter.