Cargando…

Comparison of effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Halo-femoral traction could gradually improve the coronal and sagittal deformity and restore the trunk balance through the elongation of the spine. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in the manage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiu, Yong, Liu, Zhen, Zhu, Feng, Wang, Bin, Yu, Yang, Zhu, Zezhang, Qian, Bangping, Ma, Weiwei
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2217533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18047681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-2-23
_version_ 1782149274728923136
author Qiu, Yong
Liu, Zhen
Zhu, Feng
Wang, Bin
Yu, Yang
Zhu, Zezhang
Qian, Bangping
Ma, Weiwei
author_facet Qiu, Yong
Liu, Zhen
Zhu, Feng
Wang, Bin
Yu, Yang
Zhu, Zezhang
Qian, Bangping
Ma, Weiwei
author_sort Qiu, Yong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Halo-femoral traction could gradually improve the coronal and sagittal deformity and restore the trunk balance through the elongation of the spine. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in the management of severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis. METHODS: Sixty patients with severe and rigid curve treated with anterior spinal release, Halo-femoral traction, and second stage posterior spinal fusion were recruited for this retrospective study. Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS) group was 30 patients (23 females and 7 males) with mean age of 15.5 years. The average coronal Cobb angle was 91.6° and the mean global thoracic kyphosis was 50.6°. The curve type of these patients were 2 with Lenke 1AN, 4 with Lenke 1A+, 1 with Lenke 1BN, 10 with Lenke 1CN, 3 with Lenke 1C+, 3 with Lenke 3CN, 3 with Lenke 3C+, and 4 with Lenke 5C+. Congenital Scoliosis (CS) group included 30 patients (20 females and 10 males) with average age of 15.2 years. The average coronal Cobb angle of the main curve before operation was 95.7° and the average thoracic kyphosis was 70.2°. All patients had a minimum 12-month follow-up radiograph (range 12–72 months, mean 38 months). RESULTS: The average traction time was 23 days and the average traction weight was 16 kg. Four patients experienced brachial plexus palsy and complete nerve functional restoration was achieved at two months follow-up. For the IS group, the post-operative mean Cobb angle of major curve averaged 40.1° with correction rate of 57.5%. For the CS group, the post-operative mean Cobb angle was 56.5° with average correction rate of 45.2%. The difference in curve magnitude between the IS and CS patients after posterior correction was statistically significant (t = 4.15, p < 0.001). The correction rate of kyphosis between IS and CS patients was also statistically significant (t = -2.59, p < 0.016). CONCLUSION: Halo-femoral traction was a safe, well-tolerated and effective method for the treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis patients. The posterior correction rate obtained after anterior release and traction was significant superior than that recorded from side bending film in current study.
format Text
id pubmed-2217533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22175332008-01-30 Comparison of effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study Qiu, Yong Liu, Zhen Zhu, Feng Wang, Bin Yu, Yang Zhu, Zezhang Qian, Bangping Ma, Weiwei J Orthop Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Halo-femoral traction could gradually improve the coronal and sagittal deformity and restore the trunk balance through the elongation of the spine. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in the management of severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis. METHODS: Sixty patients with severe and rigid curve treated with anterior spinal release, Halo-femoral traction, and second stage posterior spinal fusion were recruited for this retrospective study. Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS) group was 30 patients (23 females and 7 males) with mean age of 15.5 years. The average coronal Cobb angle was 91.6° and the mean global thoracic kyphosis was 50.6°. The curve type of these patients were 2 with Lenke 1AN, 4 with Lenke 1A+, 1 with Lenke 1BN, 10 with Lenke 1CN, 3 with Lenke 1C+, 3 with Lenke 3CN, 3 with Lenke 3C+, and 4 with Lenke 5C+. Congenital Scoliosis (CS) group included 30 patients (20 females and 10 males) with average age of 15.2 years. The average coronal Cobb angle of the main curve before operation was 95.7° and the average thoracic kyphosis was 70.2°. All patients had a minimum 12-month follow-up radiograph (range 12–72 months, mean 38 months). RESULTS: The average traction time was 23 days and the average traction weight was 16 kg. Four patients experienced brachial plexus palsy and complete nerve functional restoration was achieved at two months follow-up. For the IS group, the post-operative mean Cobb angle of major curve averaged 40.1° with correction rate of 57.5%. For the CS group, the post-operative mean Cobb angle was 56.5° with average correction rate of 45.2%. The difference in curve magnitude between the IS and CS patients after posterior correction was statistically significant (t = 4.15, p < 0.001). The correction rate of kyphosis between IS and CS patients was also statistically significant (t = -2.59, p < 0.016). CONCLUSION: Halo-femoral traction was a safe, well-tolerated and effective method for the treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis patients. The posterior correction rate obtained after anterior release and traction was significant superior than that recorded from side bending film in current study. BioMed Central 2007-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2217533/ /pubmed/18047681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-2-23 Text en Copyright © 2007 Qiu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qiu, Yong
Liu, Zhen
Zhu, Feng
Wang, Bin
Yu, Yang
Zhu, Zezhang
Qian, Bangping
Ma, Weiwei
Comparison of effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study
title Comparison of effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study
title_full Comparison of effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study
title_short Comparison of effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study
title_sort comparison of effectiveness of halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2217533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18047681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-2-23
work_keys_str_mv AT qiuyong comparisonofeffectivenessofhalofemoraltractionafteranteriorspinalreleaseinsevereidiopathicandcongenitalscoliosisaretrospectivestudy
AT liuzhen comparisonofeffectivenessofhalofemoraltractionafteranteriorspinalreleaseinsevereidiopathicandcongenitalscoliosisaretrospectivestudy
AT zhufeng comparisonofeffectivenessofhalofemoraltractionafteranteriorspinalreleaseinsevereidiopathicandcongenitalscoliosisaretrospectivestudy
AT wangbin comparisonofeffectivenessofhalofemoraltractionafteranteriorspinalreleaseinsevereidiopathicandcongenitalscoliosisaretrospectivestudy
AT yuyang comparisonofeffectivenessofhalofemoraltractionafteranteriorspinalreleaseinsevereidiopathicandcongenitalscoliosisaretrospectivestudy
AT zhuzezhang comparisonofeffectivenessofhalofemoraltractionafteranteriorspinalreleaseinsevereidiopathicandcongenitalscoliosisaretrospectivestudy
AT qianbangping comparisonofeffectivenessofhalofemoraltractionafteranteriorspinalreleaseinsevereidiopathicandcongenitalscoliosisaretrospectivestudy
AT maweiwei comparisonofeffectivenessofhalofemoraltractionafteranteriorspinalreleaseinsevereidiopathicandcongenitalscoliosisaretrospectivestudy