Cargando…

The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Traction is commonly used for the treatment of low back pain (LBP), predominately with nerve root involvement; however its benefits remain to be established. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the difference between two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harte, Annette A, Baxter, George D, Gracey, Jacqueline H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2217540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18047650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-118
_version_ 1782149276374138880
author Harte, Annette A
Baxter, George D
Gracey, Jacqueline H
author_facet Harte, Annette A
Baxter, George D
Gracey, Jacqueline H
author_sort Harte, Annette A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traction is commonly used for the treatment of low back pain (LBP), predominately with nerve root involvement; however its benefits remain to be established. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the difference between two treatment protocols (manual therapy, exercise and advice, with or without traction) in the management of acute/sub acute LBP with 'nerve root' involvement. METHODS: 30 LBP patients with nerve root pain were recruited and randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Primary outcome measures were the: McGill pain questionnaire, Roland Morris disability questionnaire, and the SF36 Questionnaire; recorded at baseline, discharge, 3 and 6 months post-discharge. RESULTS: 27 patients completed treatment with a loss of another four patients at follow up. Intention to treat analysis demonstrated an improvement in all outcomes at follow up points but there appeared to be little difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that a trial recruiting patients with 'nerve root' problems is feasible. Further research based upon a fully powered trial is required to ascertain if the addition of traction has any benefit in the management of these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ISRCTN78417198
format Text
id pubmed-2217540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22175402008-01-30 The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study Harte, Annette A Baxter, George D Gracey, Jacqueline H BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Traction is commonly used for the treatment of low back pain (LBP), predominately with nerve root involvement; however its benefits remain to be established. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the difference between two treatment protocols (manual therapy, exercise and advice, with or without traction) in the management of acute/sub acute LBP with 'nerve root' involvement. METHODS: 30 LBP patients with nerve root pain were recruited and randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Primary outcome measures were the: McGill pain questionnaire, Roland Morris disability questionnaire, and the SF36 Questionnaire; recorded at baseline, discharge, 3 and 6 months post-discharge. RESULTS: 27 patients completed treatment with a loss of another four patients at follow up. Intention to treat analysis demonstrated an improvement in all outcomes at follow up points but there appeared to be little difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that a trial recruiting patients with 'nerve root' problems is feasible. Further research based upon a fully powered trial is required to ascertain if the addition of traction has any benefit in the management of these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ISRCTN78417198 BioMed Central 2007-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2217540/ /pubmed/18047650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-118 Text en Copyright © 2007 Harte et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harte, Annette A
Baxter, George D
Gracey, Jacqueline H
The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study
title The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study
title_full The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study
title_fullStr The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study
title_short The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study
title_sort effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of lbp with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2217540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18047650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-118
work_keys_str_mv AT harteannettea theeffectivenessofmotorisedlumbartractioninthemanagementoflbpwithlumbosacralnerverootinvolvementafeasibilitystudy
AT baxtergeorged theeffectivenessofmotorisedlumbartractioninthemanagementoflbpwithlumbosacralnerverootinvolvementafeasibilitystudy
AT graceyjacquelineh theeffectivenessofmotorisedlumbartractioninthemanagementoflbpwithlumbosacralnerverootinvolvementafeasibilitystudy
AT harteannettea effectivenessofmotorisedlumbartractioninthemanagementoflbpwithlumbosacralnerverootinvolvementafeasibilitystudy
AT baxtergeorged effectivenessofmotorisedlumbartractioninthemanagementoflbpwithlumbosacralnerverootinvolvementafeasibilitystudy
AT graceyjacquelineh effectivenessofmotorisedlumbartractioninthemanagementoflbpwithlumbosacralnerverootinvolvementafeasibilitystudy