Cargando…
The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Traction is commonly used for the treatment of low back pain (LBP), predominately with nerve root involvement; however its benefits remain to be established. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the difference between two...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2217540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18047650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-118 |
_version_ | 1782149276374138880 |
---|---|
author | Harte, Annette A Baxter, George D Gracey, Jacqueline H |
author_facet | Harte, Annette A Baxter, George D Gracey, Jacqueline H |
author_sort | Harte, Annette A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traction is commonly used for the treatment of low back pain (LBP), predominately with nerve root involvement; however its benefits remain to be established. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the difference between two treatment protocols (manual therapy, exercise and advice, with or without traction) in the management of acute/sub acute LBP with 'nerve root' involvement. METHODS: 30 LBP patients with nerve root pain were recruited and randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Primary outcome measures were the: McGill pain questionnaire, Roland Morris disability questionnaire, and the SF36 Questionnaire; recorded at baseline, discharge, 3 and 6 months post-discharge. RESULTS: 27 patients completed treatment with a loss of another four patients at follow up. Intention to treat analysis demonstrated an improvement in all outcomes at follow up points but there appeared to be little difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that a trial recruiting patients with 'nerve root' problems is feasible. Further research based upon a fully powered trial is required to ascertain if the addition of traction has any benefit in the management of these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ISRCTN78417198 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2217540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22175402008-01-30 The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study Harte, Annette A Baxter, George D Gracey, Jacqueline H BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Traction is commonly used for the treatment of low back pain (LBP), predominately with nerve root involvement; however its benefits remain to be established. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the difference between two treatment protocols (manual therapy, exercise and advice, with or without traction) in the management of acute/sub acute LBP with 'nerve root' involvement. METHODS: 30 LBP patients with nerve root pain were recruited and randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Primary outcome measures were the: McGill pain questionnaire, Roland Morris disability questionnaire, and the SF36 Questionnaire; recorded at baseline, discharge, 3 and 6 months post-discharge. RESULTS: 27 patients completed treatment with a loss of another four patients at follow up. Intention to treat analysis demonstrated an improvement in all outcomes at follow up points but there appeared to be little difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that a trial recruiting patients with 'nerve root' problems is feasible. Further research based upon a fully powered trial is required to ascertain if the addition of traction has any benefit in the management of these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ISRCTN78417198 BioMed Central 2007-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2217540/ /pubmed/18047650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-118 Text en Copyright © 2007 Harte et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Harte, Annette A Baxter, George D Gracey, Jacqueline H The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study |
title | The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study |
title_full | The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study |
title_short | The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study |
title_sort | effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of lbp with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2217540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18047650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harteannettea theeffectivenessofmotorisedlumbartractioninthemanagementoflbpwithlumbosacralnerverootinvolvementafeasibilitystudy AT baxtergeorged theeffectivenessofmotorisedlumbartractioninthemanagementoflbpwithlumbosacralnerverootinvolvementafeasibilitystudy AT graceyjacquelineh theeffectivenessofmotorisedlumbartractioninthemanagementoflbpwithlumbosacralnerverootinvolvementafeasibilitystudy AT harteannettea effectivenessofmotorisedlumbartractioninthemanagementoflbpwithlumbosacralnerverootinvolvementafeasibilitystudy AT baxtergeorged effectivenessofmotorisedlumbartractioninthemanagementoflbpwithlumbosacralnerverootinvolvementafeasibilitystudy AT graceyjacquelineh effectivenessofmotorisedlumbartractioninthemanagementoflbpwithlumbosacralnerverootinvolvementafeasibilitystudy |