Cargando…

An observational study of the effectiveness of practice guideline implementation strategies examined according to physicians' cognitive styles

BACKGROUND: Reviews of guideline implementation recommend matching strategies to the specific setting, but provide little specific guidance about how to do so. We hypothesized that the highest level of guideline-concordant care would be achieved where implementation strategies fit well with physicia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Green, Lee A, Wyszewianski, Leon, Lowery, Julie C, Kowalski, Christine P, Krein, Sarah L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2219964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18053156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-41
_version_ 1782149320093466624
author Green, Lee A
Wyszewianski, Leon
Lowery, Julie C
Kowalski, Christine P
Krein, Sarah L
author_facet Green, Lee A
Wyszewianski, Leon
Lowery, Julie C
Kowalski, Christine P
Krein, Sarah L
author_sort Green, Lee A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reviews of guideline implementation recommend matching strategies to the specific setting, but provide little specific guidance about how to do so. We hypothesized that the highest level of guideline-concordant care would be achieved where implementation strategies fit well with physicians' cognitive styles. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of the implementation of guidelines for hypertension management among patients with diabetes at 43 Veterans' Health Administration medical center primary care clinics. Clinic leaders provided information about all implementation strategies employed at their sites. Guidelines implementation strategies were classified as education, motivation/incentive, or barrier reduction using a pre-specified system. Physician's cognitive styles were measured on three scales: evidence vs. experience as the basis of knowledge, sensitivity to pragmatic concerns, and conformity to local practices. Doctors' decisions were designated guideline-concordant if the patient's blood pressure was within goal range, or if the blood pressure was out of range and a dose change or medication change was initiated, or if the patient was already using medications from three classes. RESULTS: The final sample included 163 physicians and 1,174 patients. All of the participating sites used one or more educational approaches to implement the guidelines. Over 90% of the sites also provided group or individual feedback on physician performance on the guidelines, and over 75% implemented some type of reminder system. A minority of sites used monetary incentives, penalties, or barrier reduction. The only type of intervention that was associated with increased guideline-concordant care in a logistic model was barrier reduction (p < 0.02). The interaction between physicians' conformity scale scores and the effect of barrier reduction was significant (p < 0.05); physicians ranking lower on the conformity scale responded more to barrier reduction. CONCLUSION: Guidelines implementation strategies that were designed to reduce physician time pressure and task complexity were the only ones that improved performance. Education may have been necessary but was clearly not sufficient, and more was not better. Incentives had no discernible effect. Measurable physician characteristics strongly affected response to implementation strategies.
format Text
id pubmed-2219964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22199642008-01-31 An observational study of the effectiveness of practice guideline implementation strategies examined according to physicians' cognitive styles Green, Lee A Wyszewianski, Leon Lowery, Julie C Kowalski, Christine P Krein, Sarah L Implement Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: Reviews of guideline implementation recommend matching strategies to the specific setting, but provide little specific guidance about how to do so. We hypothesized that the highest level of guideline-concordant care would be achieved where implementation strategies fit well with physicians' cognitive styles. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of the implementation of guidelines for hypertension management among patients with diabetes at 43 Veterans' Health Administration medical center primary care clinics. Clinic leaders provided information about all implementation strategies employed at their sites. Guidelines implementation strategies were classified as education, motivation/incentive, or barrier reduction using a pre-specified system. Physician's cognitive styles were measured on three scales: evidence vs. experience as the basis of knowledge, sensitivity to pragmatic concerns, and conformity to local practices. Doctors' decisions were designated guideline-concordant if the patient's blood pressure was within goal range, or if the blood pressure was out of range and a dose change or medication change was initiated, or if the patient was already using medications from three classes. RESULTS: The final sample included 163 physicians and 1,174 patients. All of the participating sites used one or more educational approaches to implement the guidelines. Over 90% of the sites also provided group or individual feedback on physician performance on the guidelines, and over 75% implemented some type of reminder system. A minority of sites used monetary incentives, penalties, or barrier reduction. The only type of intervention that was associated with increased guideline-concordant care in a logistic model was barrier reduction (p < 0.02). The interaction between physicians' conformity scale scores and the effect of barrier reduction was significant (p < 0.05); physicians ranking lower on the conformity scale responded more to barrier reduction. CONCLUSION: Guidelines implementation strategies that were designed to reduce physician time pressure and task complexity were the only ones that improved performance. Education may have been necessary but was clearly not sufficient, and more was not better. Incentives had no discernible effect. Measurable physician characteristics strongly affected response to implementation strategies. BioMed Central 2007-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2219964/ /pubmed/18053156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-41 Text en Copyright © 2007 Green et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Green, Lee A
Wyszewianski, Leon
Lowery, Julie C
Kowalski, Christine P
Krein, Sarah L
An observational study of the effectiveness of practice guideline implementation strategies examined according to physicians' cognitive styles
title An observational study of the effectiveness of practice guideline implementation strategies examined according to physicians' cognitive styles
title_full An observational study of the effectiveness of practice guideline implementation strategies examined according to physicians' cognitive styles
title_fullStr An observational study of the effectiveness of practice guideline implementation strategies examined according to physicians' cognitive styles
title_full_unstemmed An observational study of the effectiveness of practice guideline implementation strategies examined according to physicians' cognitive styles
title_short An observational study of the effectiveness of practice guideline implementation strategies examined according to physicians' cognitive styles
title_sort observational study of the effectiveness of practice guideline implementation strategies examined according to physicians' cognitive styles
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2219964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18053156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-41
work_keys_str_mv AT greenleea anobservationalstudyoftheeffectivenessofpracticeguidelineimplementationstrategiesexaminedaccordingtophysicianscognitivestyles
AT wyszewianskileon anobservationalstudyoftheeffectivenessofpracticeguidelineimplementationstrategiesexaminedaccordingtophysicianscognitivestyles
AT loweryjuliec anobservationalstudyoftheeffectivenessofpracticeguidelineimplementationstrategiesexaminedaccordingtophysicianscognitivestyles
AT kowalskichristinep anobservationalstudyoftheeffectivenessofpracticeguidelineimplementationstrategiesexaminedaccordingtophysicianscognitivestyles
AT kreinsarahl anobservationalstudyoftheeffectivenessofpracticeguidelineimplementationstrategiesexaminedaccordingtophysicianscognitivestyles
AT greenleea observationalstudyoftheeffectivenessofpracticeguidelineimplementationstrategiesexaminedaccordingtophysicianscognitivestyles
AT wyszewianskileon observationalstudyoftheeffectivenessofpracticeguidelineimplementationstrategiesexaminedaccordingtophysicianscognitivestyles
AT loweryjuliec observationalstudyoftheeffectivenessofpracticeguidelineimplementationstrategiesexaminedaccordingtophysicianscognitivestyles
AT kowalskichristinep observationalstudyoftheeffectivenessofpracticeguidelineimplementationstrategiesexaminedaccordingtophysicianscognitivestyles
AT kreinsarahl observationalstudyoftheeffectivenessofpracticeguidelineimplementationstrategiesexaminedaccordingtophysicianscognitivestyles