Cargando…
CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging
To establish the optimum barium-based reduced-laxative tagging regimen prior to CT colonography (CTC). Ninety-five subjects underwent reduced-laxative (13 g senna/18 g magnesium citrate) CTC prior to same-day colonoscopy and were randomised to one of four tagging regimens using 20 ml 40%w/v barium s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2220024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17404739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0631-0 |
_version_ | 1782149327392604160 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Stuart A. Slater, Andrew Burling, David N. Tam, Emily Greenhalgh, Rebecca Gartner, Louise Scarth, Julia Pearce, Robert Bassett, Paul Halligan, Steve |
author_facet | Taylor, Stuart A. Slater, Andrew Burling, David N. Tam, Emily Greenhalgh, Rebecca Gartner, Louise Scarth, Julia Pearce, Robert Bassett, Paul Halligan, Steve |
author_sort | Taylor, Stuart A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To establish the optimum barium-based reduced-laxative tagging regimen prior to CT colonography (CTC). Ninety-five subjects underwent reduced-laxative (13 g senna/18 g magnesium citrate) CTC prior to same-day colonoscopy and were randomised to one of four tagging regimens using 20 ml 40%w/v barium sulphate: regimen A: four doses, B: three doses, C: three doses plus 220 ml 2.1% barium sulphate, or D: three doses plus 15 ml diatriazoate megluamine. Patient experience was assessed immediately after CTC and 1 week later. Two radiologists graded residual stool (1: none/scattered to 4: >50% circumference) and tagging efficacy for stool (1: untagged to 5: 100% tagged) and fluid (1: untagged, 2: layered, 3: tagged), noting the HU of tagged fluid. Preparation was good (76–94% segments graded 1), although best for regimen D (P = 0.02). Across all regimens, stool tagging quality was high (mean 3.7–4.5) and not significantly different among regimens. The HU of layered tagged fluid was higher for regimens C/D than A/B (P = 0.002). Detection of cancer (n = 2), polyps ≥6 mm (n = 21), and ≤5 mm (n = 72) was 100, 81 and 32% respectively, with only four false positives ≥6 mm. Reduced preparation was tolerated better than full endoscopic preparation by 61%. Reduced-laxative CTC with three doses of 20 ml 40% barium sulphate is as effective as more complex regimens, retaining adequate diagnostic accuracy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2220024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22200242008-01-31 CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging Taylor, Stuart A. Slater, Andrew Burling, David N. Tam, Emily Greenhalgh, Rebecca Gartner, Louise Scarth, Julia Pearce, Robert Bassett, Paul Halligan, Steve Eur Radiol Gastrointestinal To establish the optimum barium-based reduced-laxative tagging regimen prior to CT colonography (CTC). Ninety-five subjects underwent reduced-laxative (13 g senna/18 g magnesium citrate) CTC prior to same-day colonoscopy and were randomised to one of four tagging regimens using 20 ml 40%w/v barium sulphate: regimen A: four doses, B: three doses, C: three doses plus 220 ml 2.1% barium sulphate, or D: three doses plus 15 ml diatriazoate megluamine. Patient experience was assessed immediately after CTC and 1 week later. Two radiologists graded residual stool (1: none/scattered to 4: >50% circumference) and tagging efficacy for stool (1: untagged to 5: 100% tagged) and fluid (1: untagged, 2: layered, 3: tagged), noting the HU of tagged fluid. Preparation was good (76–94% segments graded 1), although best for regimen D (P = 0.02). Across all regimens, stool tagging quality was high (mean 3.7–4.5) and not significantly different among regimens. The HU of layered tagged fluid was higher for regimens C/D than A/B (P = 0.002). Detection of cancer (n = 2), polyps ≥6 mm (n = 21), and ≤5 mm (n = 72) was 100, 81 and 32% respectively, with only four false positives ≥6 mm. Reduced preparation was tolerated better than full endoscopic preparation by 61%. Reduced-laxative CTC with three doses of 20 ml 40% barium sulphate is as effective as more complex regimens, retaining adequate diagnostic accuracy. Springer-Verlag 2007-04-03 2008-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2220024/ /pubmed/17404739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0631-0 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2007 |
spellingShingle | Gastrointestinal Taylor, Stuart A. Slater, Andrew Burling, David N. Tam, Emily Greenhalgh, Rebecca Gartner, Louise Scarth, Julia Pearce, Robert Bassett, Paul Halligan, Steve CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging |
title | CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging |
title_full | CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging |
title_fullStr | CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging |
title_full_unstemmed | CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging |
title_short | CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging |
title_sort | ct colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging |
topic | Gastrointestinal |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2220024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17404739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0631-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorstuarta ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging AT slaterandrew ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging AT burlingdavidn ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging AT tamemily ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging AT greenhalghrebecca ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging AT gartnerlouise ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging AT scarthjulia ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging AT pearcerobert ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging AT bassettpaul ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging AT halligansteve ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging |