Cargando…

CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging

To establish the optimum barium-based reduced-laxative tagging regimen prior to CT colonography (CTC). Ninety-five subjects underwent reduced-laxative (13 g senna/18 g magnesium citrate) CTC prior to same-day colonoscopy and were randomised to one of four tagging regimens using 20 ml 40%w/v barium s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Stuart A., Slater, Andrew, Burling, David N., Tam, Emily, Greenhalgh, Rebecca, Gartner, Louise, Scarth, Julia, Pearce, Robert, Bassett, Paul, Halligan, Steve
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2220024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17404739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0631-0
_version_ 1782149327392604160
author Taylor, Stuart A.
Slater, Andrew
Burling, David N.
Tam, Emily
Greenhalgh, Rebecca
Gartner, Louise
Scarth, Julia
Pearce, Robert
Bassett, Paul
Halligan, Steve
author_facet Taylor, Stuart A.
Slater, Andrew
Burling, David N.
Tam, Emily
Greenhalgh, Rebecca
Gartner, Louise
Scarth, Julia
Pearce, Robert
Bassett, Paul
Halligan, Steve
author_sort Taylor, Stuart A.
collection PubMed
description To establish the optimum barium-based reduced-laxative tagging regimen prior to CT colonography (CTC). Ninety-five subjects underwent reduced-laxative (13 g senna/18 g magnesium citrate) CTC prior to same-day colonoscopy and were randomised to one of four tagging regimens using 20 ml 40%w/v barium sulphate: regimen A: four doses, B: three doses, C: three doses plus 220 ml 2.1% barium sulphate, or D: three doses plus 15 ml diatriazoate megluamine. Patient experience was assessed immediately after CTC and 1 week later. Two radiologists graded residual stool (1: none/scattered to 4: >50% circumference) and tagging efficacy for stool (1: untagged to 5: 100% tagged) and fluid (1: untagged, 2: layered, 3: tagged), noting the HU of tagged fluid. Preparation was good (76–94% segments graded 1), although best for regimen D (P = 0.02). Across all regimens, stool tagging quality was high (mean 3.7–4.5) and not significantly different among regimens. The HU of layered tagged fluid was higher for regimens C/D than A/B (P = 0.002). Detection of cancer (n = 2), polyps ≥6 mm (n = 21), and ≤5 mm (n = 72) was 100, 81 and 32% respectively, with only four false positives ≥6 mm. Reduced preparation was tolerated better than full endoscopic preparation by 61%. Reduced-laxative CTC with three doses of 20 ml 40% barium sulphate is as effective as more complex regimens, retaining adequate diagnostic accuracy.
format Text
id pubmed-2220024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22200242008-01-31 CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging Taylor, Stuart A. Slater, Andrew Burling, David N. Tam, Emily Greenhalgh, Rebecca Gartner, Louise Scarth, Julia Pearce, Robert Bassett, Paul Halligan, Steve Eur Radiol Gastrointestinal To establish the optimum barium-based reduced-laxative tagging regimen prior to CT colonography (CTC). Ninety-five subjects underwent reduced-laxative (13 g senna/18 g magnesium citrate) CTC prior to same-day colonoscopy and were randomised to one of four tagging regimens using 20 ml 40%w/v barium sulphate: regimen A: four doses, B: three doses, C: three doses plus 220 ml 2.1% barium sulphate, or D: three doses plus 15 ml diatriazoate megluamine. Patient experience was assessed immediately after CTC and 1 week later. Two radiologists graded residual stool (1: none/scattered to 4: >50% circumference) and tagging efficacy for stool (1: untagged to 5: 100% tagged) and fluid (1: untagged, 2: layered, 3: tagged), noting the HU of tagged fluid. Preparation was good (76–94% segments graded 1), although best for regimen D (P = 0.02). Across all regimens, stool tagging quality was high (mean 3.7–4.5) and not significantly different among regimens. The HU of layered tagged fluid was higher for regimens C/D than A/B (P = 0.002). Detection of cancer (n = 2), polyps ≥6 mm (n = 21), and ≤5 mm (n = 72) was 100, 81 and 32% respectively, with only four false positives ≥6 mm. Reduced preparation was tolerated better than full endoscopic preparation by 61%. Reduced-laxative CTC with three doses of 20 ml 40% barium sulphate is as effective as more complex regimens, retaining adequate diagnostic accuracy. Springer-Verlag 2007-04-03 2008-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2220024/ /pubmed/17404739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0631-0 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2007
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal
Taylor, Stuart A.
Slater, Andrew
Burling, David N.
Tam, Emily
Greenhalgh, Rebecca
Gartner, Louise
Scarth, Julia
Pearce, Robert
Bassett, Paul
Halligan, Steve
CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging
title CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging
title_full CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging
title_fullStr CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging
title_full_unstemmed CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging
title_short CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging
title_sort ct colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging
topic Gastrointestinal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2220024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17404739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0631-0
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorstuarta ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging
AT slaterandrew ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging
AT burlingdavidn ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging
AT tamemily ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging
AT greenhalghrebecca ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging
AT gartnerlouise ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging
AT scarthjulia ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging
AT pearcerobert ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging
AT bassettpaul ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging
AT halligansteve ctcolonographyoptimisationdiagnosticperformanceandpatientacceptabilityofreducedlaxativeregimensusingbariumbasedfaecaltagging