Cargando…

Discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND: The shape of the torso in patients with idiopathic scoliosis is considered to reflect the shape of the vertebral column, however the direct correlation between parameters describing clinical deformity and those characterizing radiological curvature was reported to be weak. It is not clea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotwicki, Tomasz, Kinel, Edyta, Stryla, Wanda, Szulc, Andrzej
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2222598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18053172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-2-18
_version_ 1782149352552136704
author Kotwicki, Tomasz
Kinel, Edyta
Stryla, Wanda
Szulc, Andrzej
author_facet Kotwicki, Tomasz
Kinel, Edyta
Stryla, Wanda
Szulc, Andrzej
author_sort Kotwicki, Tomasz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The shape of the torso in patients with idiopathic scoliosis is considered to reflect the shape of the vertebral column, however the direct correlation between parameters describing clinical deformity and those characterizing radiological curvature was reported to be weak. It is not clear if the management proposed for scoliosis (physiotherapy, brace, surgery) affects equally the shape of the axial skeleton and the surface of the body. The aim of the study was to compare clinical deformity of (1) idiopathic scoliosis girls being under brace treatment for radiological curves of 25 to 40 degrees and (2) non treated scoliotic girls matched for age and Cobb angle. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 24 girls wearing the brace versus 26 girls without brace treatment, matched for age and Cobb angle. Hypothesis: Patients wearing the brace for more than 6 months, when comparing to patients without brace, may present different external morphology of the trunk, in spite of having similar Cobb angle. Material. Inclusion criteria: girls, idiopathic scoliosis, growing age (10–16 years), Cobb angle minimum 25°, maximum 40°. The braced group consisted of girls wearing a TLSO brace (Cheneau) for more than 6 months with minimum of 16 hours per day. The non-braced group consisted of girls first seen for their spinal deformity, previously not treated. The groups presented similar curve pattern. Methods. Scoliometer exam: angle of trunk rotation at three levels of the spine: upper thoracic, main thoracic, lumbar or thoracolumbar. The maximal angle was noted at each level and the sum of three levels was calculated. Posterior trunk symmetry index (POTSI) and Hump Sum were measured using surface topography. RESULTS: Cobb angle was 34.9° ± 4.8° in braced and 32.7° ± 4.9° in un-braced patients (difference not significant). The age was 14.1 ± 1.6 years in braced patients and 13.1 ± 1.9 years in un-braced group (p = 0.046). The value of angle of trunk rotation in the main curvature was 8.4° ± 2.7°in braced and 11.4° ± 2.7° in un-braced patients (difference extremely significant, p = 0.0003). The value of the sum of angles of trunk rotation at three levels of the trunk was 12.8° ± 4.6° in braced and 16.5° ± 3.8° in un-braced patients (difference very significant, p = 0.0038). The POTSI did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.78), the Hump Sum values were not quite different (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: (1) Adolescent girls wearing the brace for idiopathic scoliosis of 25 to 40 degrees of Cobb angle, reveal smaller clinical rotational deformity of their back than non-treated girls having similar radiological deformity. (2) Evaluation of the results of treatment for idiopathic scoliosis should consider parameters describing both clinical and radiological deformity.
format Text
id pubmed-2222598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22225982008-02-01 Discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis Kotwicki, Tomasz Kinel, Edyta Stryla, Wanda Szulc, Andrzej Scoliosis Research BACKGROUND: The shape of the torso in patients with idiopathic scoliosis is considered to reflect the shape of the vertebral column, however the direct correlation between parameters describing clinical deformity and those characterizing radiological curvature was reported to be weak. It is not clear if the management proposed for scoliosis (physiotherapy, brace, surgery) affects equally the shape of the axial skeleton and the surface of the body. The aim of the study was to compare clinical deformity of (1) idiopathic scoliosis girls being under brace treatment for radiological curves of 25 to 40 degrees and (2) non treated scoliotic girls matched for age and Cobb angle. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 24 girls wearing the brace versus 26 girls without brace treatment, matched for age and Cobb angle. Hypothesis: Patients wearing the brace for more than 6 months, when comparing to patients without brace, may present different external morphology of the trunk, in spite of having similar Cobb angle. Material. Inclusion criteria: girls, idiopathic scoliosis, growing age (10–16 years), Cobb angle minimum 25°, maximum 40°. The braced group consisted of girls wearing a TLSO brace (Cheneau) for more than 6 months with minimum of 16 hours per day. The non-braced group consisted of girls first seen for their spinal deformity, previously not treated. The groups presented similar curve pattern. Methods. Scoliometer exam: angle of trunk rotation at three levels of the spine: upper thoracic, main thoracic, lumbar or thoracolumbar. The maximal angle was noted at each level and the sum of three levels was calculated. Posterior trunk symmetry index (POTSI) and Hump Sum were measured using surface topography. RESULTS: Cobb angle was 34.9° ± 4.8° in braced and 32.7° ± 4.9° in un-braced patients (difference not significant). The age was 14.1 ± 1.6 years in braced patients and 13.1 ± 1.9 years in un-braced group (p = 0.046). The value of angle of trunk rotation in the main curvature was 8.4° ± 2.7°in braced and 11.4° ± 2.7° in un-braced patients (difference extremely significant, p = 0.0003). The value of the sum of angles of trunk rotation at three levels of the trunk was 12.8° ± 4.6° in braced and 16.5° ± 3.8° in un-braced patients (difference very significant, p = 0.0038). The POTSI did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.78), the Hump Sum values were not quite different (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: (1) Adolescent girls wearing the brace for idiopathic scoliosis of 25 to 40 degrees of Cobb angle, reveal smaller clinical rotational deformity of their back than non-treated girls having similar radiological deformity. (2) Evaluation of the results of treatment for idiopathic scoliosis should consider parameters describing both clinical and radiological deformity. BioMed Central 2007-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2222598/ /pubmed/18053172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-2-18 Text en Copyright © 2007 Kotwicki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kotwicki, Tomasz
Kinel, Edyta
Stryla, Wanda
Szulc, Andrzej
Discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis
title Discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis
title_full Discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis
title_fullStr Discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis
title_short Discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis
title_sort discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2222598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18053172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-2-18
work_keys_str_mv AT kotwickitomasz discrepancyinclinicalversusradiologicalparametersdescribingdeformityduetobracetreatmentformoderateidiopathicscoliosis
AT kineledyta discrepancyinclinicalversusradiologicalparametersdescribingdeformityduetobracetreatmentformoderateidiopathicscoliosis
AT strylawanda discrepancyinclinicalversusradiologicalparametersdescribingdeformityduetobracetreatmentformoderateidiopathicscoliosis
AT szulcandrzej discrepancyinclinicalversusradiologicalparametersdescribingdeformityduetobracetreatmentformoderateidiopathicscoliosis