Cargando…
Ion Channel Selectivity through Stepwise Changes in Binding Affinity
Voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels select Ca(2+) over competing, more abundant ions by means of a high affinity binding site in the pore. The maximum off rate from this site is ∼1,000× slower than observed Ca(2+) current. Various theories that explain how high Ca(2+) current can pass through such a stick...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Rockefeller University Press
1998
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2222772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9450938 |
Sumario: | Voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels select Ca(2+) over competing, more abundant ions by means of a high affinity binding site in the pore. The maximum off rate from this site is ∼1,000× slower than observed Ca(2+) current. Various theories that explain how high Ca(2+) current can pass through such a sticky pore all assume that flux occurs from a condition in which the pore's affinity for Ca(2+) transiently decreases because of ion interactions. Here, we use rate theory calculations to demonstrate a different mechanism that requires no transient changes in affinity to quantitatively reproduce observed Ca(2+) channel behavior. The model pore has a single high affinity Ca(2+) binding site flanked by a low affinity site on either side; ions permeate in single file without repulsive interactions. The low affinity sites provide steps of potential energy that speed the exit of a Ca(2+) ion off the selectivity site, just as potential energy steps accelerate other chemical reactions. The steps could be provided by weak binding in the nonselective vestibules that appear to be a general feature of ion channels, by specific protein structures in a long pore, or by stepwise rehydration of a permeating ion. The previous ion-interaction models and this stepwise permeation model demonstrate two general mechanisms, which might well work together, to simultaneously generate high flux and high selectivity in single file pores. |
---|