Cargando…

Comparison of marrow vs blood-derived stem cells for autografting in previously untreated multiple myeloma.

Sixty-three new untreated patients with multiple myeloma under the age of 70 years received C-VAMP induction treatment followed by high-dose intravenous melphalan (200 mg m(-2)) and autologous stem cell transplant, either with marrow [autologous bone marrow transplants (ABMT), n = 26] or with granul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raje, N., Powles, R., Horton, C., Millar, B., Shepherd, V., Middleton, G., Kulkarni, S., Eisen, T., Mehta, J., Singhal, S., Treleaven, J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2223521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9184187
_version_ 1782149421121667072
author Raje, N.
Powles, R.
Horton, C.
Millar, B.
Shepherd, V.
Middleton, G.
Kulkarni, S.
Eisen, T.
Mehta, J.
Singhal, S.
Treleaven, J.
author_facet Raje, N.
Powles, R.
Horton, C.
Millar, B.
Shepherd, V.
Middleton, G.
Kulkarni, S.
Eisen, T.
Mehta, J.
Singhal, S.
Treleaven, J.
author_sort Raje, N.
collection PubMed
description Sixty-three new untreated patients with multiple myeloma under the age of 70 years received C-VAMP induction treatment followed by high-dose intravenous melphalan (200 mg m(-2)) and autologous stem cell transplant, either with marrow [autologous bone marrow transplants (ABMT), n = 26] or with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized stem cells from the blood [peripheral blood stem cell transplants (PBSCT), n = 37]. This was a sequential study and the two groups were not significantly different for all known prognostic variables. The complete remission (CR) rate after high-dose treatment was the same for both groups [ABMT 84% and PBSCT 70%; P = not significant (NS)]. Neutrophil recovery to 0.5 x 10(9) l(-1) occurred at a median of 22 days in the ABMT patients compared with 19 days for the PBSCT patients (P = NS). Platelet recovery to 50 x 10(9) l(-1) was significantly faster in PBSCT patients (19 days vs 33 days; P = 0.0015), and the PBSCT patients spent fewer days in hospital (median 20 vs 27 days; P = 0.00001). There was no difference in the two groups with respect to starting interferon (58 days for ABMT vs 55 days for PBSCT), and tolerance to interferon was identical. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the PBSCT patients has not yet been reached. The OS in the ABMT patients at 3 years was 76.9% (95% CI 60-93%) compared with 85.3% (95% CI 72-99%) in the PBSCT patients (P = NS), and the PFS at 3 years in the ABMT patients was 53.8% (95% CI 34-73%) and in the PBSCT patients was 57.6% (95% CI 34-81%) (P = NS). The probability of relapse at 3 years was 42.3% in the ABMT arm compared with 40% in the PBSCT patients (P = NS). Thus, PBSCT patients had a faster engraftment and a shorter stay in hospital than ABMT; the survival outcome and probability of relapse was the same for both groups.
format Text
id pubmed-2223521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1997
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22235212009-09-10 Comparison of marrow vs blood-derived stem cells for autografting in previously untreated multiple myeloma. Raje, N. Powles, R. Horton, C. Millar, B. Shepherd, V. Middleton, G. Kulkarni, S. Eisen, T. Mehta, J. Singhal, S. Treleaven, J. Br J Cancer Research Article Sixty-three new untreated patients with multiple myeloma under the age of 70 years received C-VAMP induction treatment followed by high-dose intravenous melphalan (200 mg m(-2)) and autologous stem cell transplant, either with marrow [autologous bone marrow transplants (ABMT), n = 26] or with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized stem cells from the blood [peripheral blood stem cell transplants (PBSCT), n = 37]. This was a sequential study and the two groups were not significantly different for all known prognostic variables. The complete remission (CR) rate after high-dose treatment was the same for both groups [ABMT 84% and PBSCT 70%; P = not significant (NS)]. Neutrophil recovery to 0.5 x 10(9) l(-1) occurred at a median of 22 days in the ABMT patients compared with 19 days for the PBSCT patients (P = NS). Platelet recovery to 50 x 10(9) l(-1) was significantly faster in PBSCT patients (19 days vs 33 days; P = 0.0015), and the PBSCT patients spent fewer days in hospital (median 20 vs 27 days; P = 0.00001). There was no difference in the two groups with respect to starting interferon (58 days for ABMT vs 55 days for PBSCT), and tolerance to interferon was identical. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the PBSCT patients has not yet been reached. The OS in the ABMT patients at 3 years was 76.9% (95% CI 60-93%) compared with 85.3% (95% CI 72-99%) in the PBSCT patients (P = NS), and the PFS at 3 years in the ABMT patients was 53.8% (95% CI 34-73%) and in the PBSCT patients was 57.6% (95% CI 34-81%) (P = NS). The probability of relapse at 3 years was 42.3% in the ABMT arm compared with 40% in the PBSCT patients (P = NS). Thus, PBSCT patients had a faster engraftment and a shorter stay in hospital than ABMT; the survival outcome and probability of relapse was the same for both groups. Nature Publishing Group 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC2223521/ /pubmed/9184187 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Raje, N.
Powles, R.
Horton, C.
Millar, B.
Shepherd, V.
Middleton, G.
Kulkarni, S.
Eisen, T.
Mehta, J.
Singhal, S.
Treleaven, J.
Comparison of marrow vs blood-derived stem cells for autografting in previously untreated multiple myeloma.
title Comparison of marrow vs blood-derived stem cells for autografting in previously untreated multiple myeloma.
title_full Comparison of marrow vs blood-derived stem cells for autografting in previously untreated multiple myeloma.
title_fullStr Comparison of marrow vs blood-derived stem cells for autografting in previously untreated multiple myeloma.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of marrow vs blood-derived stem cells for autografting in previously untreated multiple myeloma.
title_short Comparison of marrow vs blood-derived stem cells for autografting in previously untreated multiple myeloma.
title_sort comparison of marrow vs blood-derived stem cells for autografting in previously untreated multiple myeloma.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2223521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9184187
work_keys_str_mv AT rajen comparisonofmarrowvsbloodderivedstemcellsforautograftinginpreviouslyuntreatedmultiplemyeloma
AT powlesr comparisonofmarrowvsbloodderivedstemcellsforautograftinginpreviouslyuntreatedmultiplemyeloma
AT hortonc comparisonofmarrowvsbloodderivedstemcellsforautograftinginpreviouslyuntreatedmultiplemyeloma
AT millarb comparisonofmarrowvsbloodderivedstemcellsforautograftinginpreviouslyuntreatedmultiplemyeloma
AT shepherdv comparisonofmarrowvsbloodderivedstemcellsforautograftinginpreviouslyuntreatedmultiplemyeloma
AT middletong comparisonofmarrowvsbloodderivedstemcellsforautograftinginpreviouslyuntreatedmultiplemyeloma
AT kulkarnis comparisonofmarrowvsbloodderivedstemcellsforautograftinginpreviouslyuntreatedmultiplemyeloma
AT eisent comparisonofmarrowvsbloodderivedstemcellsforautograftinginpreviouslyuntreatedmultiplemyeloma
AT mehtaj comparisonofmarrowvsbloodderivedstemcellsforautograftinginpreviouslyuntreatedmultiplemyeloma
AT singhals comparisonofmarrowvsbloodderivedstemcellsforautograftinginpreviouslyuntreatedmultiplemyeloma
AT treleavenj comparisonofmarrowvsbloodderivedstemcellsforautograftinginpreviouslyuntreatedmultiplemyeloma