Cargando…
Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.
Etoposide phosphate is a water-soluble prodrug of etoposide. The plasma pharmacokinetics of etoposide following oral administration of etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide were compared. Seventeen patients with solid tumours were enrolled to receive oral etoposide phosphate 125 mg m(-2) on days 1-5...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1997
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2223531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9184183 |
_version_ | 1782149422756397056 |
---|---|
author | de Jong, R. S. Mulder, N. H. Uges, D. R. Kaul, S. Winograd, B. Sleijfer DTh, Groen, H. J. Willemse, P. H. van der Graaf, W. T. de Vries, E. G. |
author_facet | de Jong, R. S. Mulder, N. H. Uges, D. R. Kaul, S. Winograd, B. Sleijfer DTh, Groen, H. J. Willemse, P. H. van der Graaf, W. T. de Vries, E. G. |
author_sort | de Jong, R. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Etoposide phosphate is a water-soluble prodrug of etoposide. The plasma pharmacokinetics of etoposide following oral administration of etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide were compared. Seventeen patients with solid tumours were enrolled to receive oral etoposide phosphate 125 mg m(-2) on days 1-5 every 3 weeks, with escalation to 175 mg m(-2) from course 3 when possible. Patients were randomized to receive oral etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide on day 1 of course 1 and the alternative compound on day 1 of course 2. Fifteen patients received two or more courses and were evaluable for pharmacokinetic comparisons. The median AUC(inf) (area under the concentration vs time curve from zero to infinity) of etoposide was 77.7 mg l(-1) h after etoposide phosphate (95% CI 61.3-100.5) and 62.0 mg l(-1) h after oral etoposide (95% CI 52.2-76.9). The difference in favour of etoposide phosphate was borderline significant: median 9.9 mg l(-1) h (95% CI 0.1-32.8 mg l(-1) h; P = 0.05). However, the inter-patient variability of etoposide AUC(inf) was not improved (coefficients of variation 42.3% and 48.4%). Etoposide phosphate was undetectable in plasma after oral administration. Toxicities of oral etoposide phosphate were not different from those known for etoposide. In conclusion, oral etoposide phosphate does not offer a clinically relevant benefit over oral etoposide. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2223531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1997 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22235312009-09-10 Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide. de Jong, R. S. Mulder, N. H. Uges, D. R. Kaul, S. Winograd, B. Sleijfer DTh, Groen, H. J. Willemse, P. H. van der Graaf, W. T. de Vries, E. G. Br J Cancer Research Article Etoposide phosphate is a water-soluble prodrug of etoposide. The plasma pharmacokinetics of etoposide following oral administration of etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide were compared. Seventeen patients with solid tumours were enrolled to receive oral etoposide phosphate 125 mg m(-2) on days 1-5 every 3 weeks, with escalation to 175 mg m(-2) from course 3 when possible. Patients were randomized to receive oral etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide on day 1 of course 1 and the alternative compound on day 1 of course 2. Fifteen patients received two or more courses and were evaluable for pharmacokinetic comparisons. The median AUC(inf) (area under the concentration vs time curve from zero to infinity) of etoposide was 77.7 mg l(-1) h after etoposide phosphate (95% CI 61.3-100.5) and 62.0 mg l(-1) h after oral etoposide (95% CI 52.2-76.9). The difference in favour of etoposide phosphate was borderline significant: median 9.9 mg l(-1) h (95% CI 0.1-32.8 mg l(-1) h; P = 0.05). However, the inter-patient variability of etoposide AUC(inf) was not improved (coefficients of variation 42.3% and 48.4%). Etoposide phosphate was undetectable in plasma after oral administration. Toxicities of oral etoposide phosphate were not different from those known for etoposide. In conclusion, oral etoposide phosphate does not offer a clinically relevant benefit over oral etoposide. Nature Publishing Group 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC2223531/ /pubmed/9184183 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Jong, R. S. Mulder, N. H. Uges, D. R. Kaul, S. Winograd, B. Sleijfer DTh, Groen, H. J. Willemse, P. H. van der Graaf, W. T. de Vries, E. G. Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide. |
title | Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide. |
title_full | Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide. |
title_fullStr | Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide. |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide. |
title_short | Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide. |
title_sort | randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2223531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9184183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dejongrs randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide AT muldernh randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide AT ugesdr randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide AT kauls randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide AT winogradb randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide AT sleijferdth randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide AT groenhj randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide AT willemseph randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide AT vandergraafwt randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide AT devrieseg randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide |