Cargando…

Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.

Etoposide phosphate is a water-soluble prodrug of etoposide. The plasma pharmacokinetics of etoposide following oral administration of etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide were compared. Seventeen patients with solid tumours were enrolled to receive oral etoposide phosphate 125 mg m(-2) on days 1-5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Jong, R. S., Mulder, N. H., Uges, D. R., Kaul, S., Winograd, B., Sleijfer DTh, Groen, H. J., Willemse, P. H., van der Graaf, W. T., de Vries, E. G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2223531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9184183
_version_ 1782149422756397056
author de Jong, R. S.
Mulder, N. H.
Uges, D. R.
Kaul, S.
Winograd, B.
Sleijfer DTh,
Groen, H. J.
Willemse, P. H.
van der Graaf, W. T.
de Vries, E. G.
author_facet de Jong, R. S.
Mulder, N. H.
Uges, D. R.
Kaul, S.
Winograd, B.
Sleijfer DTh,
Groen, H. J.
Willemse, P. H.
van der Graaf, W. T.
de Vries, E. G.
author_sort de Jong, R. S.
collection PubMed
description Etoposide phosphate is a water-soluble prodrug of etoposide. The plasma pharmacokinetics of etoposide following oral administration of etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide were compared. Seventeen patients with solid tumours were enrolled to receive oral etoposide phosphate 125 mg m(-2) on days 1-5 every 3 weeks, with escalation to 175 mg m(-2) from course 3 when possible. Patients were randomized to receive oral etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide on day 1 of course 1 and the alternative compound on day 1 of course 2. Fifteen patients received two or more courses and were evaluable for pharmacokinetic comparisons. The median AUC(inf) (area under the concentration vs time curve from zero to infinity) of etoposide was 77.7 mg l(-1) h after etoposide phosphate (95% CI 61.3-100.5) and 62.0 mg l(-1) h after oral etoposide (95% CI 52.2-76.9). The difference in favour of etoposide phosphate was borderline significant: median 9.9 mg l(-1) h (95% CI 0.1-32.8 mg l(-1) h; P = 0.05). However, the inter-patient variability of etoposide AUC(inf) was not improved (coefficients of variation 42.3% and 48.4%). Etoposide phosphate was undetectable in plasma after oral administration. Toxicities of oral etoposide phosphate were not different from those known for etoposide. In conclusion, oral etoposide phosphate does not offer a clinically relevant benefit over oral etoposide.
format Text
id pubmed-2223531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1997
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22235312009-09-10 Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide. de Jong, R. S. Mulder, N. H. Uges, D. R. Kaul, S. Winograd, B. Sleijfer DTh, Groen, H. J. Willemse, P. H. van der Graaf, W. T. de Vries, E. G. Br J Cancer Research Article Etoposide phosphate is a water-soluble prodrug of etoposide. The plasma pharmacokinetics of etoposide following oral administration of etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide were compared. Seventeen patients with solid tumours were enrolled to receive oral etoposide phosphate 125 mg m(-2) on days 1-5 every 3 weeks, with escalation to 175 mg m(-2) from course 3 when possible. Patients were randomized to receive oral etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide on day 1 of course 1 and the alternative compound on day 1 of course 2. Fifteen patients received two or more courses and were evaluable for pharmacokinetic comparisons. The median AUC(inf) (area under the concentration vs time curve from zero to infinity) of etoposide was 77.7 mg l(-1) h after etoposide phosphate (95% CI 61.3-100.5) and 62.0 mg l(-1) h after oral etoposide (95% CI 52.2-76.9). The difference in favour of etoposide phosphate was borderline significant: median 9.9 mg l(-1) h (95% CI 0.1-32.8 mg l(-1) h; P = 0.05). However, the inter-patient variability of etoposide AUC(inf) was not improved (coefficients of variation 42.3% and 48.4%). Etoposide phosphate was undetectable in plasma after oral administration. Toxicities of oral etoposide phosphate were not different from those known for etoposide. In conclusion, oral etoposide phosphate does not offer a clinically relevant benefit over oral etoposide. Nature Publishing Group 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC2223531/ /pubmed/9184183 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Jong, R. S.
Mulder, N. H.
Uges, D. R.
Kaul, S.
Winograd, B.
Sleijfer DTh,
Groen, H. J.
Willemse, P. H.
van der Graaf, W. T.
de Vries, E. G.
Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.
title Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.
title_full Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.
title_fullStr Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.
title_full_unstemmed Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.
title_short Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.
title_sort randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2223531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9184183
work_keys_str_mv AT dejongrs randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide
AT muldernh randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide
AT ugesdr randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide
AT kauls randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide
AT winogradb randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide
AT sleijferdth randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide
AT groenhj randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide
AT willemseph randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide
AT vandergraafwt randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide
AT devrieseg randomizedcomparisonofetoposidepharmacokineticsafteroraletoposidephosphateandoraletoposide