Cargando…

A decade of clinical negligence in ophthalmology

BACKGROUND: To present an overview of the clinical negligence claims for ophthalmology in the National Health Service (NHS) in England from 1995 to 2006. To compare ophthalmic subspecialties with respect to claim numbers and payments. METHODS: All the claims on the NHS Litigation Authority database...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ali, Nadeem
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2225389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18096077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-7-20
_version_ 1782149646289731584
author Ali, Nadeem
author_facet Ali, Nadeem
author_sort Ali, Nadeem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To present an overview of the clinical negligence claims for ophthalmology in the National Health Service (NHS) in England from 1995 to 2006. To compare ophthalmic subspecialties with respect to claim numbers and payments. METHODS: All the claims on the NHS Litigation Authority database for ophthalmology for the period 1995 to 2006 were analysed. Claims were categorised by ophthalmic subspecialty, and subspecialties were ranked according to numbers of claims, total damages paid, average level of damages and paid:closed ratio (a measure of the likelihood of a claim resulting in payment of damages). RESULTS: There were 848 claims, 651 of which were closed. 46% of closed claims resulted in payment of damages. The total cost of damages over the period was £11 million. The mean level of damages was £37,100. Cataract made up the largest share of claims (31%), paediatric ophthalmology had the highest mean damages (£170,000), and claims related to glaucoma were most likely to result in payment of damages (64%). CONCLUSION: Clinical negligence claims in ophthalmology in England are infrequent, but most ophthalmologists will face at least one in their career. Ophthalmic subspecialties show marked differences with regard to their litigation profiles. From a medical protection perspective, these results suggest that indemnity premiums should be tailored according to the subspecialty areas an ophthalmologist is involved in.
format Text
id pubmed-2225389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22253892008-02-03 A decade of clinical negligence in ophthalmology Ali, Nadeem BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To present an overview of the clinical negligence claims for ophthalmology in the National Health Service (NHS) in England from 1995 to 2006. To compare ophthalmic subspecialties with respect to claim numbers and payments. METHODS: All the claims on the NHS Litigation Authority database for ophthalmology for the period 1995 to 2006 were analysed. Claims were categorised by ophthalmic subspecialty, and subspecialties were ranked according to numbers of claims, total damages paid, average level of damages and paid:closed ratio (a measure of the likelihood of a claim resulting in payment of damages). RESULTS: There were 848 claims, 651 of which were closed. 46% of closed claims resulted in payment of damages. The total cost of damages over the period was £11 million. The mean level of damages was £37,100. Cataract made up the largest share of claims (31%), paediatric ophthalmology had the highest mean damages (£170,000), and claims related to glaucoma were most likely to result in payment of damages (64%). CONCLUSION: Clinical negligence claims in ophthalmology in England are infrequent, but most ophthalmologists will face at least one in their career. Ophthalmic subspecialties show marked differences with regard to their litigation profiles. From a medical protection perspective, these results suggest that indemnity premiums should be tailored according to the subspecialty areas an ophthalmologist is involved in. BioMed Central 2007-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2225389/ /pubmed/18096077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-7-20 Text en Copyright © 2007 Ali; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ali, Nadeem
A decade of clinical negligence in ophthalmology
title A decade of clinical negligence in ophthalmology
title_full A decade of clinical negligence in ophthalmology
title_fullStr A decade of clinical negligence in ophthalmology
title_full_unstemmed A decade of clinical negligence in ophthalmology
title_short A decade of clinical negligence in ophthalmology
title_sort decade of clinical negligence in ophthalmology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2225389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18096077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-7-20
work_keys_str_mv AT alinadeem adecadeofclinicalnegligenceinophthalmology
AT alinadeem decadeofclinicalnegligenceinophthalmology