Cargando…
Follow up after Primary Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of Current Practice in the United Kingdom
Despite the clinical and financial implications, there is little evidence about how patients who have been treated for soft tissue sarcoma should be followed up. The purpose of this study was to determine current practice in the United Kingdom. 192 clinicians treating patients with soft tissue sarco...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2225460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18270541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/34128 |
_version_ | 1782149660234743808 |
---|---|
author | Gerrand, C. H. Billingham, L. J. Woll, P. J. Grimer, R. J. |
author_facet | Gerrand, C. H. Billingham, L. J. Woll, P. J. Grimer, R. J. |
author_sort | Gerrand, C. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the clinical and financial implications, there is little evidence about how patients who have been treated for soft tissue sarcoma should be followed up. The purpose of this study was to determine current practice in the United Kingdom. 192 clinicians treating patients with soft tissue sarcoma were surveyed with a postal questionnaire enquiring about frequency and method of follow up and how patients would be followed up in each of 3 clinical scenarios: a patient with a trunk or extremity tumour at low risk of relapse; a patient with a trunk or extremity tumour at high risk of relapse; and a patient with a retroperitoneal or abdominal tumour. 155 (81%) clinicians responded. Clinic visits and X-rays were the most frequently used methods of follow up. Chest CT scans, local site imaging, and blood tests were used infrequently. The intensity and methods of follow up varied with each of the clinical scenarios. There was a seven-to-twenty fold variation in cost between the least and the most expensive regimes. Respondents were generally supportive of the development of the clinical trial in this area. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2225460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22254602008-02-12 Follow up after Primary Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of Current Practice in the United Kingdom Gerrand, C. H. Billingham, L. J. Woll, P. J. Grimer, R. J. Sarcoma Research Article Despite the clinical and financial implications, there is little evidence about how patients who have been treated for soft tissue sarcoma should be followed up. The purpose of this study was to determine current practice in the United Kingdom. 192 clinicians treating patients with soft tissue sarcoma were surveyed with a postal questionnaire enquiring about frequency and method of follow up and how patients would be followed up in each of 3 clinical scenarios: a patient with a trunk or extremity tumour at low risk of relapse; a patient with a trunk or extremity tumour at high risk of relapse; and a patient with a retroperitoneal or abdominal tumour. 155 (81%) clinicians responded. Clinic visits and X-rays were the most frequently used methods of follow up. Chest CT scans, local site imaging, and blood tests were used infrequently. The intensity and methods of follow up varied with each of the clinical scenarios. There was a seven-to-twenty fold variation in cost between the least and the most expensive regimes. Respondents were generally supportive of the development of the clinical trial in this area. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2007 2007-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2225460/ /pubmed/18270541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/34128 Text en Copyright © 2007 C. H. Gerrand et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gerrand, C. H. Billingham, L. J. Woll, P. J. Grimer, R. J. Follow up after Primary Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of Current Practice in the United Kingdom |
title | Follow up after Primary Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of Current Practice in the United Kingdom |
title_full | Follow up after Primary Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of Current Practice in the United Kingdom |
title_fullStr | Follow up after Primary Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of Current Practice in the United Kingdom |
title_full_unstemmed | Follow up after Primary Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of Current Practice in the United Kingdom |
title_short | Follow up after Primary Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of Current Practice in the United Kingdom |
title_sort | follow up after primary treatment of soft tissue sarcoma: a survey of current practice in the united kingdom |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2225460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18270541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/34128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gerrandch followupafterprimarytreatmentofsofttissuesarcomaasurveyofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT billinghamlj followupafterprimarytreatmentofsofttissuesarcomaasurveyofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT wollpj followupafterprimarytreatmentofsofttissuesarcomaasurveyofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT grimerrj followupafterprimarytreatmentofsofttissuesarcomaasurveyofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom |