Cargando…

Epithelial Conduction in Hydromedusae

Sarsia, Euphysa, and other hydromedusae have been studied by electrophysiological techniques and are found to have nonnervous conducting epithelia resembling those described earlier for siphonophores. Simple, non-muscular epithelia fire singly or repetitively following brief electrical stimuli. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mackie, G. O., Passano, L. M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1968
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2225833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4386662
_version_ 1782149718698098688
author Mackie, G. O.
Passano, L. M.
author_facet Mackie, G. O.
Passano, L. M.
author_sort Mackie, G. O.
collection PubMed
description Sarsia, Euphysa, and other hydromedusae have been studied by electrophysiological techniques and are found to have nonnervous conducting epithelia resembling those described earlier for siphonophores. Simple, non-muscular epithelia fire singly or repetitively following brief electrical stimuli. The pulses recorded with suction electrodes are biphasic, initially positive, and show amplitudes of 0.75–2.0 mv, durations of 5–15 msec, and velocities of 15–35 cm/sec with short refractory periods. In the swimming muscle (myoepithelium) 2.0–4.0 mv composite events lasting 150–300 msec are associated with contraction waves. Propagation in nonnervous epithelia is typically all-or-none, nondecremental, and unpolarized. The subumbrellar endoderm lamella conducts independently of the adjacent ectoderm. The lower regions of the tentacles do not show propagated epithelial events. The spread of excitation in conducting epithelia and associated effector responses are described. Examples are given of interaction between events seemingly conducted in the nervous system and those in nonnervous epithelia. Either system may excite the other. Spontaneous activity, however, appears to originate in the nervous system. Conduction in nonnervous tissues is unaffected by excess Mg(++) in concentrations suppressing presumed nervous activity, although this may not be a wholly adequate criterion for distinguishing components of the two systems. Evidence from old work by Romanes is considered in the light of these findings and the general significance of epithelial conduction is discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-2225833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1968
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22258332008-04-23 Epithelial Conduction in Hydromedusae Mackie, G. O. Passano, L. M. J Gen Physiol Article Sarsia, Euphysa, and other hydromedusae have been studied by electrophysiological techniques and are found to have nonnervous conducting epithelia resembling those described earlier for siphonophores. Simple, non-muscular epithelia fire singly or repetitively following brief electrical stimuli. The pulses recorded with suction electrodes are biphasic, initially positive, and show amplitudes of 0.75–2.0 mv, durations of 5–15 msec, and velocities of 15–35 cm/sec with short refractory periods. In the swimming muscle (myoepithelium) 2.0–4.0 mv composite events lasting 150–300 msec are associated with contraction waves. Propagation in nonnervous epithelia is typically all-or-none, nondecremental, and unpolarized. The subumbrellar endoderm lamella conducts independently of the adjacent ectoderm. The lower regions of the tentacles do not show propagated epithelial events. The spread of excitation in conducting epithelia and associated effector responses are described. Examples are given of interaction between events seemingly conducted in the nervous system and those in nonnervous epithelia. Either system may excite the other. Spontaneous activity, however, appears to originate in the nervous system. Conduction in nonnervous tissues is unaffected by excess Mg(++) in concentrations suppressing presumed nervous activity, although this may not be a wholly adequate criterion for distinguishing components of the two systems. Evidence from old work by Romanes is considered in the light of these findings and the general significance of epithelial conduction is discussed. The Rockefeller University Press 1968-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2225833/ /pubmed/4386662 Text en Copyright © 1968 by The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mackie, G. O.
Passano, L. M.
Epithelial Conduction in Hydromedusae
title Epithelial Conduction in Hydromedusae
title_full Epithelial Conduction in Hydromedusae
title_fullStr Epithelial Conduction in Hydromedusae
title_full_unstemmed Epithelial Conduction in Hydromedusae
title_short Epithelial Conduction in Hydromedusae
title_sort epithelial conduction in hydromedusae
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2225833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4386662
work_keys_str_mv AT mackiego epithelialconductioninhydromedusae
AT passanolm epithelialconductioninhydromedusae