Cargando…

Volume Reabsorption, Transepithelial Potential Differences, and Ionic Permeability Properties in Mammalian Superficial Proximal Straight Tubules

This paper describes experiments designed to evaluate Na(+) and Cl(-) transport in isolated proximal straight tubules from rabbit kidneys. When the perfusing solution was Krebs-Ringer buffer with 25 mM HCO(3) (-) (KRB) and the bath contained KRB plus 6% albumin, net volume reabsorption (J(v), nl min...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schafer, James A., Troutman, Susan L., Andreoli, Thomas E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1974
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2226162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4443793
_version_ 1782149792806207488
author Schafer, James A.
Troutman, Susan L.
Andreoli, Thomas E.
author_facet Schafer, James A.
Troutman, Susan L.
Andreoli, Thomas E.
author_sort Schafer, James A.
collection PubMed
description This paper describes experiments designed to evaluate Na(+) and Cl(-) transport in isolated proximal straight tubules from rabbit kidneys. When the perfusing solution was Krebs-Ringer buffer with 25 mM HCO(3) (-) (KRB) and the bath contained KRB plus 6% albumin, net volume reabsorption (J(v), nl min(-1) mm(-1) was -0.46 ± 0.03 (SEM); V(e), the spontaneous transepithelial potential difference, was -1.13 ± 0.05 mV, lumen negative. Both J(v), and V(e), were reduced to zero at 21°C or with 10(-4) M ouabain, but J(v), was not HCO(3) (-) dependent. Net Na(+) reabsorption, measured as the difference between (22)Na(+) fluxes, lumen to bath and bath to lumen, accounted quantitatively for volume reabsorption, assuming the latter to be an isotonic process, and was in agreement with the difference between lumen to bath (22)Na(+) fluxes during volume reabsorption and at zero volume flow. The observed flux ratio for Na(+) was 1.46, and that predicted for a passive process was 0.99; thus, Na(+) reabsorption was rationalized in terms of an active transport process. The Cl(-) concentration of tubular fluid rose from 113.6 to 132.3 mM during volume reabsorption. Since V(e), rose to +0.82 mV when tubules were perfused with 138.6 mM Cl(-) solutions, V(e) may become positive when tubular fluid Cl(-) concentrations rise during volume reabsorption. The permeability coefficients P (Na) and P (Cl) computed from tracer fluxes were, respectively, 0.23 x 10(-4) and 0.73 x 10(-4) cm s(-1). A P (Na)/P (Cl) ratio of 0.3 described NaCl dilution potentials at zero volume flow. The magnitudes of the potentials were the same for a given NaCl gradient in either direction and P (Na)/P (Cl) was constant in the range 32–139 mM NaCl. We infer that the route of passive ion permeation was through symmetrical extracellular interfaces, presumably tight junctions, characterized by neutral polar sites in which electroneutrality is maintained by mobile counterions.
format Text
id pubmed-2226162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1974
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22261622008-04-23 Volume Reabsorption, Transepithelial Potential Differences, and Ionic Permeability Properties in Mammalian Superficial Proximal Straight Tubules Schafer, James A. Troutman, Susan L. Andreoli, Thomas E. J Gen Physiol Article This paper describes experiments designed to evaluate Na(+) and Cl(-) transport in isolated proximal straight tubules from rabbit kidneys. When the perfusing solution was Krebs-Ringer buffer with 25 mM HCO(3) (-) (KRB) and the bath contained KRB plus 6% albumin, net volume reabsorption (J(v), nl min(-1) mm(-1) was -0.46 ± 0.03 (SEM); V(e), the spontaneous transepithelial potential difference, was -1.13 ± 0.05 mV, lumen negative. Both J(v), and V(e), were reduced to zero at 21°C or with 10(-4) M ouabain, but J(v), was not HCO(3) (-) dependent. Net Na(+) reabsorption, measured as the difference between (22)Na(+) fluxes, lumen to bath and bath to lumen, accounted quantitatively for volume reabsorption, assuming the latter to be an isotonic process, and was in agreement with the difference between lumen to bath (22)Na(+) fluxes during volume reabsorption and at zero volume flow. The observed flux ratio for Na(+) was 1.46, and that predicted for a passive process was 0.99; thus, Na(+) reabsorption was rationalized in terms of an active transport process. The Cl(-) concentration of tubular fluid rose from 113.6 to 132.3 mM during volume reabsorption. Since V(e), rose to +0.82 mV when tubules were perfused with 138.6 mM Cl(-) solutions, V(e) may become positive when tubular fluid Cl(-) concentrations rise during volume reabsorption. The permeability coefficients P (Na) and P (Cl) computed from tracer fluxes were, respectively, 0.23 x 10(-4) and 0.73 x 10(-4) cm s(-1). A P (Na)/P (Cl) ratio of 0.3 described NaCl dilution potentials at zero volume flow. The magnitudes of the potentials were the same for a given NaCl gradient in either direction and P (Na)/P (Cl) was constant in the range 32–139 mM NaCl. We infer that the route of passive ion permeation was through symmetrical extracellular interfaces, presumably tight junctions, characterized by neutral polar sites in which electroneutrality is maintained by mobile counterions. The Rockefeller University Press 1974-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2226162/ /pubmed/4443793 Text en Copyright © 1974 by The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schafer, James A.
Troutman, Susan L.
Andreoli, Thomas E.
Volume Reabsorption, Transepithelial Potential Differences, and Ionic Permeability Properties in Mammalian Superficial Proximal Straight Tubules
title Volume Reabsorption, Transepithelial Potential Differences, and Ionic Permeability Properties in Mammalian Superficial Proximal Straight Tubules
title_full Volume Reabsorption, Transepithelial Potential Differences, and Ionic Permeability Properties in Mammalian Superficial Proximal Straight Tubules
title_fullStr Volume Reabsorption, Transepithelial Potential Differences, and Ionic Permeability Properties in Mammalian Superficial Proximal Straight Tubules
title_full_unstemmed Volume Reabsorption, Transepithelial Potential Differences, and Ionic Permeability Properties in Mammalian Superficial Proximal Straight Tubules
title_short Volume Reabsorption, Transepithelial Potential Differences, and Ionic Permeability Properties in Mammalian Superficial Proximal Straight Tubules
title_sort volume reabsorption, transepithelial potential differences, and ionic permeability properties in mammalian superficial proximal straight tubules
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2226162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4443793
work_keys_str_mv AT schaferjamesa volumereabsorptiontransepithelialpotentialdifferencesandionicpermeabilitypropertiesinmammaliansuperficialproximalstraighttubules
AT troutmansusanl volumereabsorptiontransepithelialpotentialdifferencesandionicpermeabilitypropertiesinmammaliansuperficialproximalstraighttubules
AT andreolithomase volumereabsorptiontransepithelialpotentialdifferencesandionicpermeabilitypropertiesinmammaliansuperficialproximalstraighttubules