Cargando…

How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis?

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic vessels are major routes for metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) are difficult to recognize in tumor histological sections. D2-40 stains podoplanin, a molecule expressed in LECs, however, the potential prognostic u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Longatto Filho, Adhemar, Oliveira, Tiago Gil, Pinheiro, Céline, de Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino, Curioni, Otávio Alberto, Mercante, Ana Maria da Cunha, Schmitt, Fernando C, Gattás, Gilka JF
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2228303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18072963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-140
_version_ 1782149873675534336
author Longatto Filho, Adhemar
Oliveira, Tiago Gil
Pinheiro, Céline
de Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino
Curioni, Otávio Alberto
Mercante, Ana Maria da Cunha
Schmitt, Fernando C
Gattás, Gilka JF
author_facet Longatto Filho, Adhemar
Oliveira, Tiago Gil
Pinheiro, Céline
de Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino
Curioni, Otávio Alberto
Mercante, Ana Maria da Cunha
Schmitt, Fernando C
Gattás, Gilka JF
author_sort Longatto Filho, Adhemar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lymphatic vessels are major routes for metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) are difficult to recognize in tumor histological sections. D2-40 stains podoplanin, a molecule expressed in LECs, however, the potential prognostic usefulness of this molecule is not completely understood in HNSCC. We aimed to investigate the value of assessing peritumoral and intratumoral lymphatic vessel density (LVD) as prognostic marker for HNSCC. METHODS: Thirty-one cases of HNSCC were stained for D2-40 and CD31. LVD and blood vessel density (BVD) were assessed by counting positive reactions in 10 hotspot areas at ×200 magnification. RESULTS: D2-40 was specific for lymphatic vessels and did not stain blood vascular endothelial cells. LECs showed more tortuous and disorganized structure in intratumoral lymphatic vessels than in peritumoral ones. No statistical differences were observed between peritumoral-LVD and intratumoral-LVD or between peritumoral-BVD and intratumoral-BVD. Tumor D2-40 staining was positively associated with lymphatic vessel invasion (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: LVD is a powerful marker for HNSCC prognosis. We found significant differences in peritumoral and intratumoral D2-40 immunoreactivity, which could have important implications in future therapeutic strategies and outcome evaluation.
format Text
id pubmed-2228303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22283032008-02-05 How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis? Longatto Filho, Adhemar Oliveira, Tiago Gil Pinheiro, Céline de Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino Curioni, Otávio Alberto Mercante, Ana Maria da Cunha Schmitt, Fernando C Gattás, Gilka JF World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Lymphatic vessels are major routes for metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) are difficult to recognize in tumor histological sections. D2-40 stains podoplanin, a molecule expressed in LECs, however, the potential prognostic usefulness of this molecule is not completely understood in HNSCC. We aimed to investigate the value of assessing peritumoral and intratumoral lymphatic vessel density (LVD) as prognostic marker for HNSCC. METHODS: Thirty-one cases of HNSCC were stained for D2-40 and CD31. LVD and blood vessel density (BVD) were assessed by counting positive reactions in 10 hotspot areas at ×200 magnification. RESULTS: D2-40 was specific for lymphatic vessels and did not stain blood vascular endothelial cells. LECs showed more tortuous and disorganized structure in intratumoral lymphatic vessels than in peritumoral ones. No statistical differences were observed between peritumoral-LVD and intratumoral-LVD or between peritumoral-BVD and intratumoral-BVD. Tumor D2-40 staining was positively associated with lymphatic vessel invasion (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: LVD is a powerful marker for HNSCC prognosis. We found significant differences in peritumoral and intratumoral D2-40 immunoreactivity, which could have important implications in future therapeutic strategies and outcome evaluation. BioMed Central 2007-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2228303/ /pubmed/18072963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-140 Text en Copyright © 2007 Longatto Filho et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Longatto Filho, Adhemar
Oliveira, Tiago Gil
Pinheiro, Céline
de Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino
Curioni, Otávio Alberto
Mercante, Ana Maria da Cunha
Schmitt, Fernando C
Gattás, Gilka JF
How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis?
title How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis?
title_full How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis?
title_fullStr How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis?
title_full_unstemmed How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis?
title_short How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis?
title_sort how useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2228303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18072963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-140
work_keys_str_mv AT longattofilhoadhemar howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis
AT oliveiratiagogil howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis
AT pinheiroceline howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis
AT decarvalhomarcosbrasilino howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis
AT curioniotavioalberto howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis
AT mercanteanamariadacunha howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis
AT schmittfernandoc howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis
AT gattasgilkajf howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis