Cargando…
How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis?
BACKGROUND: Lymphatic vessels are major routes for metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) are difficult to recognize in tumor histological sections. D2-40 stains podoplanin, a molecule expressed in LECs, however, the potential prognostic u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2228303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18072963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-140 |
_version_ | 1782149873675534336 |
---|---|
author | Longatto Filho, Adhemar Oliveira, Tiago Gil Pinheiro, Céline de Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino Curioni, Otávio Alberto Mercante, Ana Maria da Cunha Schmitt, Fernando C Gattás, Gilka JF |
author_facet | Longatto Filho, Adhemar Oliveira, Tiago Gil Pinheiro, Céline de Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino Curioni, Otávio Alberto Mercante, Ana Maria da Cunha Schmitt, Fernando C Gattás, Gilka JF |
author_sort | Longatto Filho, Adhemar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lymphatic vessels are major routes for metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) are difficult to recognize in tumor histological sections. D2-40 stains podoplanin, a molecule expressed in LECs, however, the potential prognostic usefulness of this molecule is not completely understood in HNSCC. We aimed to investigate the value of assessing peritumoral and intratumoral lymphatic vessel density (LVD) as prognostic marker for HNSCC. METHODS: Thirty-one cases of HNSCC were stained for D2-40 and CD31. LVD and blood vessel density (BVD) were assessed by counting positive reactions in 10 hotspot areas at ×200 magnification. RESULTS: D2-40 was specific for lymphatic vessels and did not stain blood vascular endothelial cells. LECs showed more tortuous and disorganized structure in intratumoral lymphatic vessels than in peritumoral ones. No statistical differences were observed between peritumoral-LVD and intratumoral-LVD or between peritumoral-BVD and intratumoral-BVD. Tumor D2-40 staining was positively associated with lymphatic vessel invasion (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: LVD is a powerful marker for HNSCC prognosis. We found significant differences in peritumoral and intratumoral D2-40 immunoreactivity, which could have important implications in future therapeutic strategies and outcome evaluation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2228303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22283032008-02-05 How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis? Longatto Filho, Adhemar Oliveira, Tiago Gil Pinheiro, Céline de Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino Curioni, Otávio Alberto Mercante, Ana Maria da Cunha Schmitt, Fernando C Gattás, Gilka JF World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Lymphatic vessels are major routes for metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) are difficult to recognize in tumor histological sections. D2-40 stains podoplanin, a molecule expressed in LECs, however, the potential prognostic usefulness of this molecule is not completely understood in HNSCC. We aimed to investigate the value of assessing peritumoral and intratumoral lymphatic vessel density (LVD) as prognostic marker for HNSCC. METHODS: Thirty-one cases of HNSCC were stained for D2-40 and CD31. LVD and blood vessel density (BVD) were assessed by counting positive reactions in 10 hotspot areas at ×200 magnification. RESULTS: D2-40 was specific for lymphatic vessels and did not stain blood vascular endothelial cells. LECs showed more tortuous and disorganized structure in intratumoral lymphatic vessels than in peritumoral ones. No statistical differences were observed between peritumoral-LVD and intratumoral-LVD or between peritumoral-BVD and intratumoral-BVD. Tumor D2-40 staining was positively associated with lymphatic vessel invasion (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: LVD is a powerful marker for HNSCC prognosis. We found significant differences in peritumoral and intratumoral D2-40 immunoreactivity, which could have important implications in future therapeutic strategies and outcome evaluation. BioMed Central 2007-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2228303/ /pubmed/18072963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-140 Text en Copyright © 2007 Longatto Filho et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Longatto Filho, Adhemar Oliveira, Tiago Gil Pinheiro, Céline de Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino Curioni, Otávio Alberto Mercante, Ana Maria da Cunha Schmitt, Fernando C Gattás, Gilka JF How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis? |
title | How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis? |
title_full | How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis? |
title_fullStr | How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis? |
title_full_unstemmed | How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis? |
title_short | How useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis? |
title_sort | how useful is the assessment of lymphatic vascular density in oral carcinoma prognosis? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2228303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18072963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longattofilhoadhemar howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis AT oliveiratiagogil howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis AT pinheiroceline howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis AT decarvalhomarcosbrasilino howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis AT curioniotavioalberto howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis AT mercanteanamariadacunha howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis AT schmittfernandoc howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis AT gattasgilkajf howusefulistheassessmentoflymphaticvasculardensityinoralcarcinomaprognosis |