Cargando…
The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study
The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2230608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18269691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6155 |
_version_ | 1782150231581786112 |
---|---|
author | Vangerow, Burkhard Shorr, Andrew F Wyncoll, Duncan Janes, Jonathan Nelson, David R Reinhart, Konrad |
author_facet | Vangerow, Burkhard Shorr, Andrew F Wyncoll, Duncan Janes, Jonathan Nelson, David R Reinhart, Konrad |
author_sort | Vangerow, Burkhard |
collection | PubMed |
description | The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis) trial indicate that administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated; DrotAA) leads to an increase in endogenous protein C levels in severe sepsis patients. In a group as heterogeneous as sepsis patients, the currently approved dose and duration of administration (24 μg/kg per hour for 96 hours) might not be optimal in some individuals. The RESPOND (Research Evaluating Serial Protein C levels in severe sepsis patients ON Drotrecogin alfa [activated]) trial is a phase II study being conducted to explore the use of endogenous protein C level as both a biomarker and a steering parameter for administration of DrotAA. Eligible patients will receive DrotAA either at the normal, currently approved dose and duration of administration ('standard therapy') or at a higher dose with variable infusion duration or variable infusion duration only ('alternative therapy'). The duration of DrotAA infusion in the alternative therapy arm depends on the individual response in terms of sustained increase in endogenous protein C. The ultimate aims of this and potential following studies are as follows: to establish serial plasma protein C measurement as a biomarker that will aid in the identification of severe sepsis patients who are most likely to benefit from DrotAA therapy, to enable adjustment of DrotAA therapy in individual patients (specifically, the possibility to use a higher dose and to adjust the infusion duration), and to provide guidance to the clinician regarding whether the patient is responding to DrotAA. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2230608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22306082008-02-06 The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study Vangerow, Burkhard Shorr, Andrew F Wyncoll, Duncan Janes, Jonathan Nelson, David R Reinhart, Konrad Crit Care Review The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis) trial indicate that administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated; DrotAA) leads to an increase in endogenous protein C levels in severe sepsis patients. In a group as heterogeneous as sepsis patients, the currently approved dose and duration of administration (24 μg/kg per hour for 96 hours) might not be optimal in some individuals. The RESPOND (Research Evaluating Serial Protein C levels in severe sepsis patients ON Drotrecogin alfa [activated]) trial is a phase II study being conducted to explore the use of endogenous protein C level as both a biomarker and a steering parameter for administration of DrotAA. Eligible patients will receive DrotAA either at the normal, currently approved dose and duration of administration ('standard therapy') or at a higher dose with variable infusion duration or variable infusion duration only ('alternative therapy'). The duration of DrotAA infusion in the alternative therapy arm depends on the individual response in terms of sustained increase in endogenous protein C. The ultimate aims of this and potential following studies are as follows: to establish serial plasma protein C measurement as a biomarker that will aid in the identification of severe sepsis patients who are most likely to benefit from DrotAA therapy, to enable adjustment of DrotAA therapy in individual patients (specifically, the possibility to use a higher dose and to adjust the infusion duration), and to provide guidance to the clinician regarding whether the patient is responding to DrotAA. BioMed Central 2007 2007-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2230608/ /pubmed/18269691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6155 Text en Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Review Vangerow, Burkhard Shorr, Andrew F Wyncoll, Duncan Janes, Jonathan Nelson, David R Reinhart, Konrad The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study |
title | The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study |
title_full | The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study |
title_fullStr | The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study |
title_full_unstemmed | The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study |
title_short | The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study |
title_sort | protein c pathway: implications for the design of the respond study |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2230608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18269691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6155 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vangerowburkhard theproteincpathwayimplicationsforthedesignoftherespondstudy AT shorrandrewf theproteincpathwayimplicationsforthedesignoftherespondstudy AT wyncollduncan theproteincpathwayimplicationsforthedesignoftherespondstudy AT janesjonathan theproteincpathwayimplicationsforthedesignoftherespondstudy AT nelsondavidr theproteincpathwayimplicationsforthedesignoftherespondstudy AT reinhartkonrad theproteincpathwayimplicationsforthedesignoftherespondstudy AT vangerowburkhard proteincpathwayimplicationsforthedesignoftherespondstudy AT shorrandrewf proteincpathwayimplicationsforthedesignoftherespondstudy AT wyncollduncan proteincpathwayimplicationsforthedesignoftherespondstudy AT janesjonathan proteincpathwayimplicationsforthedesignoftherespondstudy AT nelsondavidr proteincpathwayimplicationsforthedesignoftherespondstudy AT reinhartkonrad proteincpathwayimplicationsforthedesignoftherespondstudy |