Cargando…

Social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to solitary living over long time scales

BACKGROUND: The major lineages of eusocial insects, the ants, termites, stingless bees, honeybees and vespid wasps, all have ancient origins (≥ 65 mya) with no reversions to solitary behaviour. This has prompted the notion of a 'point of no return' whereby the evolutionary elaboration and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chenoweth, Luke B, Tierney, Simon M, Smith, Jaclyn A, Cooper, Steven JB, Schwarz, Michael P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2231370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18154646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-246
_version_ 1782150248053866496
author Chenoweth, Luke B
Tierney, Simon M
Smith, Jaclyn A
Cooper, Steven JB
Schwarz, Michael P
author_facet Chenoweth, Luke B
Tierney, Simon M
Smith, Jaclyn A
Cooper, Steven JB
Schwarz, Michael P
author_sort Chenoweth, Luke B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The major lineages of eusocial insects, the ants, termites, stingless bees, honeybees and vespid wasps, all have ancient origins (≥ 65 mya) with no reversions to solitary behaviour. This has prompted the notion of a 'point of no return' whereby the evolutionary elaboration and integration of behavioural, genetic and morphological traits over a very long period of time leads to a situation where reversion to solitary living is no longer an evolutionary option. RESULTS: We show that in another group of social insects, the allodapine bees, there was a single origin of sociality > 40 mya. We also provide data on the biology of a key allodapine species, Halterapis nigrinervis, showing that it is truly social. H. nigrinervis was thought to be the only allodapine that was not social, and our findings therefore indicate that there have been no losses of sociality among extant allodapine clades. Allodapine colony sizes rarely exceed 10 females per nest and all females in virtually all species are capable of nesting and reproducing independently, so these bees clearly do not fit the 'point of no return' concept. CONCLUSION: We argue that allodapine sociality has been maintained by ecological constraints and the benefits of alloparental care, as opposed to behavioural, genetic or morphological constraints to independent living. Allodapine brood are highly vulnerable to predation because they are progressively reared in an open nest (not in sealed brood cells), which provides potentially large benefits for alloparental care and incentives for reproductives to tolerate potential alloparents. We argue that similar vulnerabilities may also help explain the lack of reversions to solitary living in other taxa with ancient social origins.
format Text
id pubmed-2231370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22313702008-02-06 Social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to solitary living over long time scales Chenoweth, Luke B Tierney, Simon M Smith, Jaclyn A Cooper, Steven JB Schwarz, Michael P BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The major lineages of eusocial insects, the ants, termites, stingless bees, honeybees and vespid wasps, all have ancient origins (≥ 65 mya) with no reversions to solitary behaviour. This has prompted the notion of a 'point of no return' whereby the evolutionary elaboration and integration of behavioural, genetic and morphological traits over a very long period of time leads to a situation where reversion to solitary living is no longer an evolutionary option. RESULTS: We show that in another group of social insects, the allodapine bees, there was a single origin of sociality > 40 mya. We also provide data on the biology of a key allodapine species, Halterapis nigrinervis, showing that it is truly social. H. nigrinervis was thought to be the only allodapine that was not social, and our findings therefore indicate that there have been no losses of sociality among extant allodapine clades. Allodapine colony sizes rarely exceed 10 females per nest and all females in virtually all species are capable of nesting and reproducing independently, so these bees clearly do not fit the 'point of no return' concept. CONCLUSION: We argue that allodapine sociality has been maintained by ecological constraints and the benefits of alloparental care, as opposed to behavioural, genetic or morphological constraints to independent living. Allodapine brood are highly vulnerable to predation because they are progressively reared in an open nest (not in sealed brood cells), which provides potentially large benefits for alloparental care and incentives for reproductives to tolerate potential alloparents. We argue that similar vulnerabilities may also help explain the lack of reversions to solitary living in other taxa with ancient social origins. BioMed Central 2007-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2231370/ /pubmed/18154646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-246 Text en Copyright © 2007 Chenoweth et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chenoweth, Luke B
Tierney, Simon M
Smith, Jaclyn A
Cooper, Steven JB
Schwarz, Michael P
Social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to solitary living over long time scales
title Social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to solitary living over long time scales
title_full Social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to solitary living over long time scales
title_fullStr Social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to solitary living over long time scales
title_full_unstemmed Social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to solitary living over long time scales
title_short Social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to solitary living over long time scales
title_sort social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to solitary living over long time scales
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2231370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18154646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-246
work_keys_str_mv AT chenowethlukeb socialcomplexityinbeesisnotsufficienttoexplainlackofreversionstosolitarylivingoverlongtimescales
AT tierneysimonm socialcomplexityinbeesisnotsufficienttoexplainlackofreversionstosolitarylivingoverlongtimescales
AT smithjaclyna socialcomplexityinbeesisnotsufficienttoexplainlackofreversionstosolitarylivingoverlongtimescales
AT cooperstevenjb socialcomplexityinbeesisnotsufficienttoexplainlackofreversionstosolitarylivingoverlongtimescales
AT schwarzmichaelp socialcomplexityinbeesisnotsufficienttoexplainlackofreversionstosolitarylivingoverlongtimescales