Cargando…

Comparing validity of Edinburgh scale and SRQ20 in screening for post-partum depression

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the instrument most used worldwide for screening of Post-Partum Depression (PPD). The SRQ20 questionnaire has been largely used for screening of minor psychiatric disorders. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the two instruments in screenin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Iná S, Matijasevich, Alicia, Tavares, Beatriz F, da Cruz Lima, Andrey C, Riegel, Rafael E, Lopes, Bruna C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2233608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17903254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-18
_version_ 1782150265493782528
author Santos, Iná S
Matijasevich, Alicia
Tavares, Beatriz F
da Cruz Lima, Andrey C
Riegel, Rafael E
Lopes, Bruna C
author_facet Santos, Iná S
Matijasevich, Alicia
Tavares, Beatriz F
da Cruz Lima, Andrey C
Riegel, Rafael E
Lopes, Bruna C
author_sort Santos, Iná S
collection PubMed
description The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the instrument most used worldwide for screening of Post-Partum Depression (PPD). The SRQ20 questionnaire has been largely used for screening of minor psychiatric disorders. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the two instruments in screening for PPD. At the third-month follow-up home visit to infants of the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Southern Brazil, a sub-sample of 378 mothers was selected. Among other questions, EPDS and SRQ20 were applied by trained fieldworkers. Up to 15 days later, a mental health professional re-interviewed the mother (the gold standard interview). Sensitivity and specificity of each cutoff point were calculated for EPDS and SRQ20 and the results were plotted at a ROC curve. The areas under both curves were compared. Highest sensitivity and specificity cutoff were observed for EPDS ≥ 10 (sensitivity 82.7%, 95%CI 74.0 – 89.4; specificity 65.3%, 95%CI 59.4 – 71.0) and for SRQ20 ≥ 6 (sensitivity 70.5%, 95%CI 60.8 – 79.0%; specificity 75.5%, 95%CI 70.0 – 80.5%). Shape of ROC curves and areas under both curves were virtually identical (respectively, 0.8401 ± 0.02 for EPDS and 0.8402 ± 0.02 for SRQ20; p = 0.9). In conclusion SRQ20 showed to be as valid as EPDS as a screening tool for PPD at third month after delivery.
format Text
id pubmed-2233608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22336082008-02-07 Comparing validity of Edinburgh scale and SRQ20 in screening for post-partum depression Santos, Iná S Matijasevich, Alicia Tavares, Beatriz F da Cruz Lima, Andrey C Riegel, Rafael E Lopes, Bruna C Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health Short report The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the instrument most used worldwide for screening of Post-Partum Depression (PPD). The SRQ20 questionnaire has been largely used for screening of minor psychiatric disorders. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the two instruments in screening for PPD. At the third-month follow-up home visit to infants of the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Southern Brazil, a sub-sample of 378 mothers was selected. Among other questions, EPDS and SRQ20 were applied by trained fieldworkers. Up to 15 days later, a mental health professional re-interviewed the mother (the gold standard interview). Sensitivity and specificity of each cutoff point were calculated for EPDS and SRQ20 and the results were plotted at a ROC curve. The areas under both curves were compared. Highest sensitivity and specificity cutoff were observed for EPDS ≥ 10 (sensitivity 82.7%, 95%CI 74.0 – 89.4; specificity 65.3%, 95%CI 59.4 – 71.0) and for SRQ20 ≥ 6 (sensitivity 70.5%, 95%CI 60.8 – 79.0%; specificity 75.5%, 95%CI 70.0 – 80.5%). Shape of ROC curves and areas under both curves were virtually identical (respectively, 0.8401 ± 0.02 for EPDS and 0.8402 ± 0.02 for SRQ20; p = 0.9). In conclusion SRQ20 showed to be as valid as EPDS as a screening tool for PPD at third month after delivery. BioMed Central 2007-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2233608/ /pubmed/17903254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-18 Text en Copyright ©2007 Santos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short report
Santos, Iná S
Matijasevich, Alicia
Tavares, Beatriz F
da Cruz Lima, Andrey C
Riegel, Rafael E
Lopes, Bruna C
Comparing validity of Edinburgh scale and SRQ20 in screening for post-partum depression
title Comparing validity of Edinburgh scale and SRQ20 in screening for post-partum depression
title_full Comparing validity of Edinburgh scale and SRQ20 in screening for post-partum depression
title_fullStr Comparing validity of Edinburgh scale and SRQ20 in screening for post-partum depression
title_full_unstemmed Comparing validity of Edinburgh scale and SRQ20 in screening for post-partum depression
title_short Comparing validity of Edinburgh scale and SRQ20 in screening for post-partum depression
title_sort comparing validity of edinburgh scale and srq20 in screening for post-partum depression
topic Short report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2233608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17903254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-18
work_keys_str_mv AT santosinas comparingvalidityofedinburghscaleandsrq20inscreeningforpostpartumdepression
AT matijasevichalicia comparingvalidityofedinburghscaleandsrq20inscreeningforpostpartumdepression
AT tavaresbeatrizf comparingvalidityofedinburghscaleandsrq20inscreeningforpostpartumdepression
AT dacruzlimaandreyc comparingvalidityofedinburghscaleandsrq20inscreeningforpostpartumdepression
AT riegelrafaele comparingvalidityofedinburghscaleandsrq20inscreeningforpostpartumdepression
AT lopesbrunac comparingvalidityofedinburghscaleandsrq20inscreeningforpostpartumdepression