Cargando…

Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network

BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that genetic regulatory systems are 'modular', in that the whole system is made up of smaller 'subsystems' corresponding to specific biological functions. Most attempts to identify modules in genetic regulatory systems have relied on the topology...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irons, David J, Monk, Nicholas AM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2233651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17961242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-413
_version_ 1782150275594715136
author Irons, David J
Monk, Nicholas AM
author_facet Irons, David J
Monk, Nicholas AM
author_sort Irons, David J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that genetic regulatory systems are 'modular', in that the whole system is made up of smaller 'subsystems' corresponding to specific biological functions. Most attempts to identify modules in genetic regulatory systems have relied on the topology of the underlying network. However, it is the temporal activity (dynamics) of genes and proteins that corresponds to biological functions, and hence it is dynamics that we focus on here for identifying subsystems. RESULTS: Using Boolean network models as an exemplar, we present a new technique to identify subsystems, based on their dynamical properties. The main part of the method depends only on the stable dynamics (attractors) of the system, thus requiring no prior knowledge of the underlying network. However, knowledge of the logical relationships between the network components can be used to describe how each subsystem is regulated. To demonstrate its applicability to genetic regulatory systems, we apply the method to a model of the Drosophila segment polarity network, providing a detailed breakdown of the system. CONCLUSION: We have designed a technique for decomposing any set of discrete-state, discrete-time attractors into subsystems. Having a suitable mathematical model also allows us to describe how each subsystem is regulated and how robust each subsystem is against perturbations. However, since the subsystems are found directly from the attractors, a mathematical model or underlying network topology is not necessarily required to identify them, potentially allowing the method to be applied directly to experimental expression data.
format Text
id pubmed-2233651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22336512008-02-07 Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network Irons, David J Monk, Nicholas AM BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that genetic regulatory systems are 'modular', in that the whole system is made up of smaller 'subsystems' corresponding to specific biological functions. Most attempts to identify modules in genetic regulatory systems have relied on the topology of the underlying network. However, it is the temporal activity (dynamics) of genes and proteins that corresponds to biological functions, and hence it is dynamics that we focus on here for identifying subsystems. RESULTS: Using Boolean network models as an exemplar, we present a new technique to identify subsystems, based on their dynamical properties. The main part of the method depends only on the stable dynamics (attractors) of the system, thus requiring no prior knowledge of the underlying network. However, knowledge of the logical relationships between the network components can be used to describe how each subsystem is regulated. To demonstrate its applicability to genetic regulatory systems, we apply the method to a model of the Drosophila segment polarity network, providing a detailed breakdown of the system. CONCLUSION: We have designed a technique for decomposing any set of discrete-state, discrete-time attractors into subsystems. Having a suitable mathematical model also allows us to describe how each subsystem is regulated and how robust each subsystem is against perturbations. However, since the subsystems are found directly from the attractors, a mathematical model or underlying network topology is not necessarily required to identify them, potentially allowing the method to be applied directly to experimental expression data. BioMed Central 2007-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2233651/ /pubmed/17961242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-413 Text en Copyright © 2007 Irons and Monk; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Irons, David J
Monk, Nicholas AM
Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
title Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
title_full Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
title_fullStr Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
title_full_unstemmed Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
title_short Identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
title_sort identifying dynamical modules from genetic regulatory systems: applications to the segment polarity network
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2233651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17961242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-413
work_keys_str_mv AT ironsdavidj identifyingdynamicalmodulesfromgeneticregulatorysystemsapplicationstothesegmentpolaritynetwork
AT monknicholasam identifyingdynamicalmodulesfromgeneticregulatorysystemsapplicationstothesegmentpolaritynetwork