Cargando…

Separation and Characterization of Currents through Store-operated CRAC Channels and Mg(2+)-inhibited Cation (MIC) Channels

Although store-operated calcium release–activated Ca(2+) (CRAC) channels are highly Ca(2+)-selective under physiological ionic conditions, removal of extracellular divalent cations makes them freely permeable to monovalent cations. Several past studies have concluded that under these conditions CRAC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prakriya, Murali, Lewis, Richard S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2233817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11981025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.20028551
_version_ 1782150305740226560
author Prakriya, Murali
Lewis, Richard S.
author_facet Prakriya, Murali
Lewis, Richard S.
author_sort Prakriya, Murali
collection PubMed
description Although store-operated calcium release–activated Ca(2+) (CRAC) channels are highly Ca(2+)-selective under physiological ionic conditions, removal of extracellular divalent cations makes them freely permeable to monovalent cations. Several past studies have concluded that under these conditions CRAC channels conduct Na(+) and Cs(+) with a unitary conductance of ∼40 pS, and that intracellular Mg(2+) modulates their activity and selectivity. These results have important implications for understanding ion permeation through CRAC channels and for screening potential CRAC channel genes. We find that the observed 40-pS channels are not CRAC channels, but are instead Mg(2+)-inhibited cation (MIC) channels that open as Mg(2+) is washed out of the cytosol. MIC channels differ from CRAC channels in several critical respects. Store depletion does not activate MIC channels, nor does store refilling deactivate them. Unlike CRAC channels, MIC channels are not blocked by SKF 96365, are not potentiated by low doses of 2-APB, and are less sensitive to block by high doses of the drug. By applying 8–10 mM intracellular Mg(2+) to inhibit MIC channels, we examined monovalent permeation through CRAC channels in isolation. A rapid switch from 20 mM Ca(2+) to divalent-free extracellular solution evokes Na(+) current through open CRAC channels (Na(+)-I(CRAC)) that is initially eightfold larger than the preceding Ca(2+) current and declines by ∼80% over 20 s. Unlike MIC channels, CRAC channels are largely impermeable to Cs(+) (P(Cs)/P(Na) = 0.13 vs. 1.2 for MIC). Neither the decline in Na(+)-I(CRAC) nor its low Cs(+) permeability are affected by intracellular Mg(2+) (90 μM to 10 mM). Single openings of monovalent CRAC channels were not detectable in whole-cell recordings, but a unitary conductance of 0.2 pS was estimated from noise analysis. This new information about the selectivity, conductance, and regulation of CRAC channels forces a revision of the biophysical fingerprint of CRAC channels, and reveals intriguing similarities and differences in permeation mechanisms of voltage-gated and store-operated Ca(2+) channels.
format Text
id pubmed-2233817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22338172008-04-21 Separation and Characterization of Currents through Store-operated CRAC Channels and Mg(2+)-inhibited Cation (MIC) Channels Prakriya, Murali Lewis, Richard S. J Gen Physiol Article Although store-operated calcium release–activated Ca(2+) (CRAC) channels are highly Ca(2+)-selective under physiological ionic conditions, removal of extracellular divalent cations makes them freely permeable to monovalent cations. Several past studies have concluded that under these conditions CRAC channels conduct Na(+) and Cs(+) with a unitary conductance of ∼40 pS, and that intracellular Mg(2+) modulates their activity and selectivity. These results have important implications for understanding ion permeation through CRAC channels and for screening potential CRAC channel genes. We find that the observed 40-pS channels are not CRAC channels, but are instead Mg(2+)-inhibited cation (MIC) channels that open as Mg(2+) is washed out of the cytosol. MIC channels differ from CRAC channels in several critical respects. Store depletion does not activate MIC channels, nor does store refilling deactivate them. Unlike CRAC channels, MIC channels are not blocked by SKF 96365, are not potentiated by low doses of 2-APB, and are less sensitive to block by high doses of the drug. By applying 8–10 mM intracellular Mg(2+) to inhibit MIC channels, we examined monovalent permeation through CRAC channels in isolation. A rapid switch from 20 mM Ca(2+) to divalent-free extracellular solution evokes Na(+) current through open CRAC channels (Na(+)-I(CRAC)) that is initially eightfold larger than the preceding Ca(2+) current and declines by ∼80% over 20 s. Unlike MIC channels, CRAC channels are largely impermeable to Cs(+) (P(Cs)/P(Na) = 0.13 vs. 1.2 for MIC). Neither the decline in Na(+)-I(CRAC) nor its low Cs(+) permeability are affected by intracellular Mg(2+) (90 μM to 10 mM). Single openings of monovalent CRAC channels were not detectable in whole-cell recordings, but a unitary conductance of 0.2 pS was estimated from noise analysis. This new information about the selectivity, conductance, and regulation of CRAC channels forces a revision of the biophysical fingerprint of CRAC channels, and reveals intriguing similarities and differences in permeation mechanisms of voltage-gated and store-operated Ca(2+) channels. The Rockefeller University Press 2002-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2233817/ /pubmed/11981025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.20028551 Text en Copyright © 2002, The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Prakriya, Murali
Lewis, Richard S.
Separation and Characterization of Currents through Store-operated CRAC Channels and Mg(2+)-inhibited Cation (MIC) Channels
title Separation and Characterization of Currents through Store-operated CRAC Channels and Mg(2+)-inhibited Cation (MIC) Channels
title_full Separation and Characterization of Currents through Store-operated CRAC Channels and Mg(2+)-inhibited Cation (MIC) Channels
title_fullStr Separation and Characterization of Currents through Store-operated CRAC Channels and Mg(2+)-inhibited Cation (MIC) Channels
title_full_unstemmed Separation and Characterization of Currents through Store-operated CRAC Channels and Mg(2+)-inhibited Cation (MIC) Channels
title_short Separation and Characterization of Currents through Store-operated CRAC Channels and Mg(2+)-inhibited Cation (MIC) Channels
title_sort separation and characterization of currents through store-operated crac channels and mg(2+)-inhibited cation (mic) channels
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2233817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11981025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.20028551
work_keys_str_mv AT prakriyamurali separationandcharacterizationofcurrentsthroughstoreoperatedcracchannelsandmg2inhibitedcationmicchannels
AT lewisrichards separationandcharacterizationofcurrentsthroughstoreoperatedcracchannelsandmg2inhibitedcationmicchannels