Cargando…

Gating Charges in the Activation and Inactivation Processes of the hERG Channel

The hERG channel has a relatively slow activation process but an extremely fast and voltage-sensitive inactivation process. Direct measurement of hERG's gating current (Piper, D.R., A. Varghese, M.C. Sanguinetti, and M. Tristani-Firouzi. 2003. PNAS. 100:10534–10539) reveals two kinetic componen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Mei, Liu, Jie, Tseng, Gea-Ny
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2234031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15545400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200409119
_version_ 1782150332500934656
author Zhang, Mei
Liu, Jie
Tseng, Gea-Ny
author_facet Zhang, Mei
Liu, Jie
Tseng, Gea-Ny
author_sort Zhang, Mei
collection PubMed
description The hERG channel has a relatively slow activation process but an extremely fast and voltage-sensitive inactivation process. Direct measurement of hERG's gating current (Piper, D.R., A. Varghese, M.C. Sanguinetti, and M. Tristani-Firouzi. 2003. PNAS. 100:10534–10539) reveals two kinetic components of gating charge transfer that may originate from two channel domains. This study is designed to address three questions: (1) which of the six positive charges in hERG's major voltage sensor, S4, are responsible for gating charge transfer during activation, (2) whether a negative charge in the cytoplasmic half of S2 (D466) also contributes to gating charge transfer, and (3) whether S4 serves as the sole voltage sensor for hERG inactivation. We individually mutate S4's positive charges and D466 to cysteine, and examine (a) effects of mutations on the number of equivalent gating charges transferred during activation (z(a)) and inactivation (z(i)), and (b) sidedness and state dependence of accessibility of introduced cysteine side chains to a membrane-impermeable thiol-modifying reagent (MTSET). Neutralizing the outer three positive charges in S4 and D466 in S2 reduces z(a), and cysteine side chains introduced into these positions experience state-dependent changes in MTSET accessibility. On the other hand, neutralizing the inner three positive charges in S4 does not affect z(a). None of the charge mutations affect z(i). We propose that the scheme of gating charge transfer during hERG's activation process is similar to that described for the Shaker channel, although hERG has less gating charge in its S4 than in Shaker. Furthermore, channel domain other than S4 contributes to gating charge involved in hERG's inactivation process.
format Text
id pubmed-2234031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22340312008-03-21 Gating Charges in the Activation and Inactivation Processes of the hERG Channel Zhang, Mei Liu, Jie Tseng, Gea-Ny J Gen Physiol Article The hERG channel has a relatively slow activation process but an extremely fast and voltage-sensitive inactivation process. Direct measurement of hERG's gating current (Piper, D.R., A. Varghese, M.C. Sanguinetti, and M. Tristani-Firouzi. 2003. PNAS. 100:10534–10539) reveals two kinetic components of gating charge transfer that may originate from two channel domains. This study is designed to address three questions: (1) which of the six positive charges in hERG's major voltage sensor, S4, are responsible for gating charge transfer during activation, (2) whether a negative charge in the cytoplasmic half of S2 (D466) also contributes to gating charge transfer, and (3) whether S4 serves as the sole voltage sensor for hERG inactivation. We individually mutate S4's positive charges and D466 to cysteine, and examine (a) effects of mutations on the number of equivalent gating charges transferred during activation (z(a)) and inactivation (z(i)), and (b) sidedness and state dependence of accessibility of introduced cysteine side chains to a membrane-impermeable thiol-modifying reagent (MTSET). Neutralizing the outer three positive charges in S4 and D466 in S2 reduces z(a), and cysteine side chains introduced into these positions experience state-dependent changes in MTSET accessibility. On the other hand, neutralizing the inner three positive charges in S4 does not affect z(a). None of the charge mutations affect z(i). We propose that the scheme of gating charge transfer during hERG's activation process is similar to that described for the Shaker channel, although hERG has less gating charge in its S4 than in Shaker. Furthermore, channel domain other than S4 contributes to gating charge involved in hERG's inactivation process. The Rockefeller University Press 2004-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2234031/ /pubmed/15545400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200409119 Text en Copyright © 2004, The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Mei
Liu, Jie
Tseng, Gea-Ny
Gating Charges in the Activation and Inactivation Processes of the hERG Channel
title Gating Charges in the Activation and Inactivation Processes of the hERG Channel
title_full Gating Charges in the Activation and Inactivation Processes of the hERG Channel
title_fullStr Gating Charges in the Activation and Inactivation Processes of the hERG Channel
title_full_unstemmed Gating Charges in the Activation and Inactivation Processes of the hERG Channel
title_short Gating Charges in the Activation and Inactivation Processes of the hERG Channel
title_sort gating charges in the activation and inactivation processes of the herg channel
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2234031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15545400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200409119
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangmei gatingchargesintheactivationandinactivationprocessesofthehergchannel
AT liujie gatingchargesintheactivationandinactivationprocessesofthehergchannel
AT tsenggeany gatingchargesintheactivationandinactivationprocessesofthehergchannel