Cargando…

Doloplus-2, a valid tool for behavioural pain assessment?

BACKGROUND: The Doloplus-2 is used for behavioural pain assessment in cognitively impaired patients. Little data exists on the psychometric properties of the Doloplus-2. Our objectives were to test the criterion validity and inter-rater reliability of the Doloplus-2, and to explore a design for vali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hølen, Jacob C, Saltvedt, Ingvild, Fayers, Peter M, Hjermstad, Marianne J, Loge, Jon H, Kaasa, Stein
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2234400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18093294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-7-29
_version_ 1782150358613622784
author Hølen, Jacob C
Saltvedt, Ingvild
Fayers, Peter M
Hjermstad, Marianne J
Loge, Jon H
Kaasa, Stein
author_facet Hølen, Jacob C
Saltvedt, Ingvild
Fayers, Peter M
Hjermstad, Marianne J
Loge, Jon H
Kaasa, Stein
author_sort Hølen, Jacob C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Doloplus-2 is used for behavioural pain assessment in cognitively impaired patients. Little data exists on the psychometric properties of the Doloplus-2. Our objectives were to test the criterion validity and inter-rater reliability of the Doloplus-2, and to explore a design for validations of behavioural pain assessment tools. METHODS: Fifty-one nursing home patients and 22 patients admitted to a geriatric hospital ward were included. All were cognitively impaired and unable to self-report pain. Each patient was examined by an expert in pain evaluation and treatment, who rated the pain on a numerical rating scale. The ratings were based on information from the medical record, reports from nurses and patients (if possible) about pain during the past 24 hours, and a clinical examination. These ratings were used as pain criterion. The Doloplus-2 was administered by the attending nurse. Regression analyses were used to estimate the ability of the Doloplus-2 to explain the expert's ratings. The inter-rater reliability of the Doloplus-2 was evaluated in 16 patients by comparing the ratings of two nurses administrating the Doloplus-2. RESULTS: There was no association between the Doloplus-2 and the expert's pain ratings (R(2 )= 0.02). There was an association (R(2 )= 0.54) between the expert's ratings and the Doloplus-2 scores in a subgroup of 16 patients assessed by a geriatric expert nurse (the most experienced Doloplus-2 administrator). The inter-rater reliability between the Doloplus-2 administrators assessed by the intra-class coefficient was 0.77. The pain expert's ratings were compared with ratings of two independent geriatricians in a sub sample of 15, and were found satisfactory (intra-class correlation 0.74). CONCLUSION: It was challenging to conduct such a study in patients with cognitive impairment and the study has several limitations. The results do not support the validity of the Doloplus-2 in its present version and they indicate that it demands specific administration skills.
format Text
id pubmed-2234400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22344002008-02-08 Doloplus-2, a valid tool for behavioural pain assessment? Hølen, Jacob C Saltvedt, Ingvild Fayers, Peter M Hjermstad, Marianne J Loge, Jon H Kaasa, Stein BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The Doloplus-2 is used for behavioural pain assessment in cognitively impaired patients. Little data exists on the psychometric properties of the Doloplus-2. Our objectives were to test the criterion validity and inter-rater reliability of the Doloplus-2, and to explore a design for validations of behavioural pain assessment tools. METHODS: Fifty-one nursing home patients and 22 patients admitted to a geriatric hospital ward were included. All were cognitively impaired and unable to self-report pain. Each patient was examined by an expert in pain evaluation and treatment, who rated the pain on a numerical rating scale. The ratings were based on information from the medical record, reports from nurses and patients (if possible) about pain during the past 24 hours, and a clinical examination. These ratings were used as pain criterion. The Doloplus-2 was administered by the attending nurse. Regression analyses were used to estimate the ability of the Doloplus-2 to explain the expert's ratings. The inter-rater reliability of the Doloplus-2 was evaluated in 16 patients by comparing the ratings of two nurses administrating the Doloplus-2. RESULTS: There was no association between the Doloplus-2 and the expert's pain ratings (R(2 )= 0.02). There was an association (R(2 )= 0.54) between the expert's ratings and the Doloplus-2 scores in a subgroup of 16 patients assessed by a geriatric expert nurse (the most experienced Doloplus-2 administrator). The inter-rater reliability between the Doloplus-2 administrators assessed by the intra-class coefficient was 0.77. The pain expert's ratings were compared with ratings of two independent geriatricians in a sub sample of 15, and were found satisfactory (intra-class correlation 0.74). CONCLUSION: It was challenging to conduct such a study in patients with cognitive impairment and the study has several limitations. The results do not support the validity of the Doloplus-2 in its present version and they indicate that it demands specific administration skills. BioMed Central 2007-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2234400/ /pubmed/18093294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-7-29 Text en Copyright © 2007 Holen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hølen, Jacob C
Saltvedt, Ingvild
Fayers, Peter M
Hjermstad, Marianne J
Loge, Jon H
Kaasa, Stein
Doloplus-2, a valid tool for behavioural pain assessment?
title Doloplus-2, a valid tool for behavioural pain assessment?
title_full Doloplus-2, a valid tool for behavioural pain assessment?
title_fullStr Doloplus-2, a valid tool for behavioural pain assessment?
title_full_unstemmed Doloplus-2, a valid tool for behavioural pain assessment?
title_short Doloplus-2, a valid tool for behavioural pain assessment?
title_sort doloplus-2, a valid tool for behavioural pain assessment?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2234400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18093294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-7-29
work_keys_str_mv AT hølenjacobc doloplus2avalidtoolforbehaviouralpainassessment
AT saltvedtingvild doloplus2avalidtoolforbehaviouralpainassessment
AT fayerspeterm doloplus2avalidtoolforbehaviouralpainassessment
AT hjermstadmariannej doloplus2avalidtoolforbehaviouralpainassessment
AT logejonh doloplus2avalidtoolforbehaviouralpainassessment
AT kaasastein doloplus2avalidtoolforbehaviouralpainassessment