Cargando…

Using machine learning algorithms to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients

BACKGROUND: Targeting older clients for rehabilitation is a clinical challenge and a research priority. We investigate the potential of machine learning algorithms – Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) – to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients. METHODS: This stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Mu, Zhang, Zhanyang, Hirdes, John P, Stolee, Paul
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18096079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-7-41
_version_ 1782150395023327232
author Zhu, Mu
Zhang, Zhanyang
Hirdes, John P
Stolee, Paul
author_facet Zhu, Mu
Zhang, Zhanyang
Hirdes, John P
Stolee, Paul
author_sort Zhu, Mu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Targeting older clients for rehabilitation is a clinical challenge and a research priority. We investigate the potential of machine learning algorithms – Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) – to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of data on 24,724 longer-term clients from eight home care programs in Ontario. Data were collected with the RAI-HC assessment system, in which the Activities of Daily Living Clinical Assessment Protocol (ADLCAP) is used to identify clients with rehabilitation potential. For study purposes, a client is defined as having rehabilitation potential if there was: i) improvement in ADL functioning, or ii) discharge home. SVM and KNN results are compared with those obtained using the ADLCAP. For comparison, the machine learning algorithms use the same functional and health status indicators as the ADLCAP. RESULTS: The KNN and SVM algorithms achieved similar substantially improved performance over the ADLCAP, although false positive and false negative rates were still fairly high (FP > .18, FN > .34 versus FP > .29, FN. > .58 for ADLCAP). Results are used to suggest potential revisions to the ADLCAP. CONCLUSION: Machine learning algorithms achieved superior predictions than the current protocol. Machine learning results are less readily interpretable, but can also be used to guide development of improved clinical protocols.
format Text
id pubmed-2235834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22358342008-02-15 Using machine learning algorithms to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients Zhu, Mu Zhang, Zhanyang Hirdes, John P Stolee, Paul BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Targeting older clients for rehabilitation is a clinical challenge and a research priority. We investigate the potential of machine learning algorithms – Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) – to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of data on 24,724 longer-term clients from eight home care programs in Ontario. Data were collected with the RAI-HC assessment system, in which the Activities of Daily Living Clinical Assessment Protocol (ADLCAP) is used to identify clients with rehabilitation potential. For study purposes, a client is defined as having rehabilitation potential if there was: i) improvement in ADL functioning, or ii) discharge home. SVM and KNN results are compared with those obtained using the ADLCAP. For comparison, the machine learning algorithms use the same functional and health status indicators as the ADLCAP. RESULTS: The KNN and SVM algorithms achieved similar substantially improved performance over the ADLCAP, although false positive and false negative rates were still fairly high (FP > .18, FN > .34 versus FP > .29, FN. > .58 for ADLCAP). Results are used to suggest potential revisions to the ADLCAP. CONCLUSION: Machine learning algorithms achieved superior predictions than the current protocol. Machine learning results are less readily interpretable, but can also be used to guide development of improved clinical protocols. BioMed Central 2007-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2235834/ /pubmed/18096079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-7-41 Text en Copyright © 2007 Zhu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhu, Mu
Zhang, Zhanyang
Hirdes, John P
Stolee, Paul
Using machine learning algorithms to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients
title Using machine learning algorithms to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients
title_full Using machine learning algorithms to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients
title_fullStr Using machine learning algorithms to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients
title_full_unstemmed Using machine learning algorithms to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients
title_short Using machine learning algorithms to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients
title_sort using machine learning algorithms to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18096079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-7-41
work_keys_str_mv AT zhumu usingmachinelearningalgorithmstoguiderehabilitationplanningforhomecareclients
AT zhangzhanyang usingmachinelearningalgorithmstoguiderehabilitationplanningforhomecareclients
AT hirdesjohnp usingmachinelearningalgorithmstoguiderehabilitationplanningforhomecareclients
AT stoleepaul usingmachinelearningalgorithmstoguiderehabilitationplanningforhomecareclients