Cargando…

Treatment of rabbit cheyletiellosis with selamectin or ivermectin: a retrospective case study

BACKGROUND: A retrospective study of rabbits treated against cheyletiellosis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of selamectin or ivermectin in clinical practice. METHODS: Medical records from 53 rabbits with microscopically confirmed Cheyletiella infestation were collected from two sm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mellgren, Marianne, Bergvall, Kerstin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18171479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-50-1
_version_ 1782150404369285120
author Mellgren, Marianne
Bergvall, Kerstin
author_facet Mellgren, Marianne
Bergvall, Kerstin
author_sort Mellgren, Marianne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A retrospective study of rabbits treated against cheyletiellosis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of selamectin or ivermectin in clinical practice. METHODS: Medical records from 53 rabbits with microscopically confirmed Cheyletiella infestation were collected from two small animal clinics. The rabbits were divided into three groups, based on treatment protocols. Group 1 included 11 rabbits treated with ivermectin injections at 200–476 μg kg(-1 )subcutaneously 2–3 times, with a mean interval of 11 days. In Group 2, 27 rabbits were treated with a combination of subcutaneous ivermectin injections (range 618–2185 μgkg(-1)) and oral ivermectin (range 616–2732 μgkg(-1)) administered by the owners, 3–6 times at 10 days interval. The last group (Group 3) included 15 rabbits treated with selamectin spot-on applications of 6.2–20,0 mgkg(-1), 1–3 times with an interval of 2–4 weeks. Follow-up time was 4 months–4.5 years. RESULTS: Rabbits in remission were 9/11 (81,8%), 14/27 (51,9%) and 12/15 (80,8%) in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: All treatment protocols seemed to be sufficiently effective and safe for practice use. Though very high doses were used in Group 2 (ivermectin injections followed by oral administration), the protocol seemed less efficacious compared to ivermectin injections (Group 1) and selamectin spot on (Group 3), respectively, although not statistically significant. Controlled prospective studies including larger groups are needed to further evaluate efficacy of the treatment protocols.
format Text
id pubmed-2235873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22358732008-02-09 Treatment of rabbit cheyletiellosis with selamectin or ivermectin: a retrospective case study Mellgren, Marianne Bergvall, Kerstin Acta Vet Scand Case Study BACKGROUND: A retrospective study of rabbits treated against cheyletiellosis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of selamectin or ivermectin in clinical practice. METHODS: Medical records from 53 rabbits with microscopically confirmed Cheyletiella infestation were collected from two small animal clinics. The rabbits were divided into three groups, based on treatment protocols. Group 1 included 11 rabbits treated with ivermectin injections at 200–476 μg kg(-1 )subcutaneously 2–3 times, with a mean interval of 11 days. In Group 2, 27 rabbits were treated with a combination of subcutaneous ivermectin injections (range 618–2185 μgkg(-1)) and oral ivermectin (range 616–2732 μgkg(-1)) administered by the owners, 3–6 times at 10 days interval. The last group (Group 3) included 15 rabbits treated with selamectin spot-on applications of 6.2–20,0 mgkg(-1), 1–3 times with an interval of 2–4 weeks. Follow-up time was 4 months–4.5 years. RESULTS: Rabbits in remission were 9/11 (81,8%), 14/27 (51,9%) and 12/15 (80,8%) in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: All treatment protocols seemed to be sufficiently effective and safe for practice use. Though very high doses were used in Group 2 (ivermectin injections followed by oral administration), the protocol seemed less efficacious compared to ivermectin injections (Group 1) and selamectin spot on (Group 3), respectively, although not statistically significant. Controlled prospective studies including larger groups are needed to further evaluate efficacy of the treatment protocols. BioMed Central 2008-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2235873/ /pubmed/18171479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-50-1 Text en Copyright © 2008 Mellgren and Bergvall; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Study
Mellgren, Marianne
Bergvall, Kerstin
Treatment of rabbit cheyletiellosis with selamectin or ivermectin: a retrospective case study
title Treatment of rabbit cheyletiellosis with selamectin or ivermectin: a retrospective case study
title_full Treatment of rabbit cheyletiellosis with selamectin or ivermectin: a retrospective case study
title_fullStr Treatment of rabbit cheyletiellosis with selamectin or ivermectin: a retrospective case study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of rabbit cheyletiellosis with selamectin or ivermectin: a retrospective case study
title_short Treatment of rabbit cheyletiellosis with selamectin or ivermectin: a retrospective case study
title_sort treatment of rabbit cheyletiellosis with selamectin or ivermectin: a retrospective case study
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18171479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-50-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mellgrenmarianne treatmentofrabbitcheyletiellosiswithselamectinorivermectinaretrospectivecasestudy
AT bergvallkerstin treatmentofrabbitcheyletiellosiswithselamectinorivermectinaretrospectivecasestudy