Cargando…

Checkpoint independence of most DNA replication origins in fission yeast

BACKGROUND: In budding yeast, the replication checkpoint slows progress through S phase by inhibiting replication origin firing. In mammals, the replication checkpoint inhibits both origin firing and replication fork movement. To find out which strategy is employed in the fission yeast, Schizosaccha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mickle, Katie L, Ramanathan, Sunita, Rosebrock, Adam, Oliva, Anna, Chaudari, Amna, Yompakdee, Chulee, Scott, Donna, Leatherwood, Janet, Huberman, Joel A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18093330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-112
_version_ 1782150408606580736
author Mickle, Katie L
Ramanathan, Sunita
Rosebrock, Adam
Oliva, Anna
Chaudari, Amna
Yompakdee, Chulee
Scott, Donna
Leatherwood, Janet
Huberman, Joel A
author_facet Mickle, Katie L
Ramanathan, Sunita
Rosebrock, Adam
Oliva, Anna
Chaudari, Amna
Yompakdee, Chulee
Scott, Donna
Leatherwood, Janet
Huberman, Joel A
author_sort Mickle, Katie L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In budding yeast, the replication checkpoint slows progress through S phase by inhibiting replication origin firing. In mammals, the replication checkpoint inhibits both origin firing and replication fork movement. To find out which strategy is employed in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we used microarrays to investigate the use of origins by wild-type and checkpoint-mutant strains in the presence of hydroxyurea (HU), which limits the pool of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) and activates the replication checkpoint. The checkpoint-mutant cells carried deletions either of rad3 (which encodes the fission yeast homologue of ATR) or cds1 (which encodes the fission yeast homologue of Chk2). RESULTS: Our microarray results proved to be largely consistent with those independently obtained and recently published by three other laboratories. However, we were able to reconcile differences between the previous studies regarding the extent to which fission yeast replication origins are affected by the replication checkpoint. We found (consistent with the three previous studies after appropriate interpretation) that, in surprising contrast to budding yeast, most fission yeast origins, including both early- and late-firing origins, are not significantly affected by checkpoint mutations during replication in the presence of HU. A few origins (~3%) behaved like those in budding yeast: they replicated earlier in the checkpoint mutants than in wild type. These were located primarily in the heterochromatic subtelomeric regions of chromosomes 1 and 2. Indeed, the subtelomeric regions defined by the strongest checkpoint restraint correspond precisely to previously mapped subtelomeric heterochromatin. This observation implies that subtelomeric heterochromatin in fission yeast differs from heterochromatin at centromeres, in the mating type region, and in ribosomal DNA, since these regions replicated at least as efficiently in wild-type cells as in checkpoint-mutant cells. CONCLUSION: The fact that ~97% of fission yeast replication origins – both early and late – are not significantly affected by replication checkpoint mutations in HU-treated cells suggests that (i) most late-firing origins are restrained from firing in HU-treated cells by at least one checkpoint-independent mechanism, and (ii) checkpoint-dependent slowing of S phase in fission yeast when DNA is damaged may be accomplished primarily by the slowing of replication forks.
format Text
id pubmed-2235891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22358912008-02-09 Checkpoint independence of most DNA replication origins in fission yeast Mickle, Katie L Ramanathan, Sunita Rosebrock, Adam Oliva, Anna Chaudari, Amna Yompakdee, Chulee Scott, Donna Leatherwood, Janet Huberman, Joel A BMC Mol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: In budding yeast, the replication checkpoint slows progress through S phase by inhibiting replication origin firing. In mammals, the replication checkpoint inhibits both origin firing and replication fork movement. To find out which strategy is employed in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we used microarrays to investigate the use of origins by wild-type and checkpoint-mutant strains in the presence of hydroxyurea (HU), which limits the pool of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) and activates the replication checkpoint. The checkpoint-mutant cells carried deletions either of rad3 (which encodes the fission yeast homologue of ATR) or cds1 (which encodes the fission yeast homologue of Chk2). RESULTS: Our microarray results proved to be largely consistent with those independently obtained and recently published by three other laboratories. However, we were able to reconcile differences between the previous studies regarding the extent to which fission yeast replication origins are affected by the replication checkpoint. We found (consistent with the three previous studies after appropriate interpretation) that, in surprising contrast to budding yeast, most fission yeast origins, including both early- and late-firing origins, are not significantly affected by checkpoint mutations during replication in the presence of HU. A few origins (~3%) behaved like those in budding yeast: they replicated earlier in the checkpoint mutants than in wild type. These were located primarily in the heterochromatic subtelomeric regions of chromosomes 1 and 2. Indeed, the subtelomeric regions defined by the strongest checkpoint restraint correspond precisely to previously mapped subtelomeric heterochromatin. This observation implies that subtelomeric heterochromatin in fission yeast differs from heterochromatin at centromeres, in the mating type region, and in ribosomal DNA, since these regions replicated at least as efficiently in wild-type cells as in checkpoint-mutant cells. CONCLUSION: The fact that ~97% of fission yeast replication origins – both early and late – are not significantly affected by replication checkpoint mutations in HU-treated cells suggests that (i) most late-firing origins are restrained from firing in HU-treated cells by at least one checkpoint-independent mechanism, and (ii) checkpoint-dependent slowing of S phase in fission yeast when DNA is damaged may be accomplished primarily by the slowing of replication forks. BioMed Central 2007-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2235891/ /pubmed/18093330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-112 Text en Copyright © 2007 Mickle et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mickle, Katie L
Ramanathan, Sunita
Rosebrock, Adam
Oliva, Anna
Chaudari, Amna
Yompakdee, Chulee
Scott, Donna
Leatherwood, Janet
Huberman, Joel A
Checkpoint independence of most DNA replication origins in fission yeast
title Checkpoint independence of most DNA replication origins in fission yeast
title_full Checkpoint independence of most DNA replication origins in fission yeast
title_fullStr Checkpoint independence of most DNA replication origins in fission yeast
title_full_unstemmed Checkpoint independence of most DNA replication origins in fission yeast
title_short Checkpoint independence of most DNA replication origins in fission yeast
title_sort checkpoint independence of most dna replication origins in fission yeast
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18093330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-112
work_keys_str_mv AT micklekatiel checkpointindependenceofmostdnareplicationoriginsinfissionyeast
AT ramanathansunita checkpointindependenceofmostdnareplicationoriginsinfissionyeast
AT rosebrockadam checkpointindependenceofmostdnareplicationoriginsinfissionyeast
AT olivaanna checkpointindependenceofmostdnareplicationoriginsinfissionyeast
AT chaudariamna checkpointindependenceofmostdnareplicationoriginsinfissionyeast
AT yompakdeechulee checkpointindependenceofmostdnareplicationoriginsinfissionyeast
AT scottdonna checkpointindependenceofmostdnareplicationoriginsinfissionyeast
AT leatherwoodjanet checkpointindependenceofmostdnareplicationoriginsinfissionyeast
AT hubermanjoela checkpointindependenceofmostdnareplicationoriginsinfissionyeast