Cargando…
THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION
Measurements of ΔI as a function of retinal area illuminated have been obtained at various levels of standard intensity I (1), using "white" light and light of three modal wave-lengths (λ465, 525, 680), for monocular stimulation and for simultaneous excitation of the two eyes ("binocu...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Rockefeller University Press
1939
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2237912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19873136 |
_version_ | 1782150417823563776 |
---|---|
author | Crozier, W. J. Holway, A. H. |
author_facet | Crozier, W. J. Holway, A. H. |
author_sort | Crozier, W. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Measurements of ΔI as a function of retinal area illuminated have been obtained at various levels of standard intensity I (1), using "white" light and light of three modal wave-lengths (λ465, 525, 680), for monocular stimulation and for simultaneous excitation of the two eyes ("binocular"), using several methods of varying (rectangular) area and retinal location, with control of exposure time. For data homogeneous with respect to method of presentation, log ΔI(m) = -Z log A + C, where ΔI = Ĩ (2) – I (1), A is area illuminated, and C is a terminal constant (= log ΔI(m) for A = 1 unit) depending on the units in which ΔI and A are expressed, and upon I (1). The equation is readily deduced on dimensional grounds, without reference to specific theories of the nature of ΔI or of retinal area in terms of its excitable units. Z is independent of the units of I and A. Experimentally it is found to be the same for monocular and binocular excitations, as is to be expected. Also as is expected it is not independent of λ, and it is markedly influenced by the scheme according to which A is varied; it depends directly upon the rate at which potentially excitable elements are added when A is made to increase. For simultaneous excitation of the two eyes (when of very nearly equivalent excitability), ΔĪ(B) is less than for stimulation of either eye alone, at all levels of I (1), A, λ. The mean ratio (ΔĪ(L) + ΔĪ(R))/2 to ΔI(B) was 1.38. For white light, doubling A on one retina reduces ΔI(m) in the ratio 1.21, or a little less than for binocular presentation under the same conditions. These facts are consistent with the view that the properties of ΔI are quantitatively determined by events central to the retina. The measure σ(1ΔI) of organic variation in discrimination of intensities and ΔI(m) are found to be in simple proportion, independent of I (1), A, λ (and exposure time). Variability (σ(1ΔI)) is not a function of the mode of presentation, save that it may be slightly higher when both retinas are excited, and its magnitude (for a given level of ΔI(m)) is independent of the law according to which the adjustable intensity I (2) is instrumentally controlled. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2237912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1939 |
publisher | The Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22379122008-04-23 THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION Crozier, W. J. Holway, A. H. J Gen Physiol Article Measurements of ΔI as a function of retinal area illuminated have been obtained at various levels of standard intensity I (1), using "white" light and light of three modal wave-lengths (λ465, 525, 680), for monocular stimulation and for simultaneous excitation of the two eyes ("binocular"), using several methods of varying (rectangular) area and retinal location, with control of exposure time. For data homogeneous with respect to method of presentation, log ΔI(m) = -Z log A + C, where ΔI = Ĩ (2) – I (1), A is area illuminated, and C is a terminal constant (= log ΔI(m) for A = 1 unit) depending on the units in which ΔI and A are expressed, and upon I (1). The equation is readily deduced on dimensional grounds, without reference to specific theories of the nature of ΔI or of retinal area in terms of its excitable units. Z is independent of the units of I and A. Experimentally it is found to be the same for monocular and binocular excitations, as is to be expected. Also as is expected it is not independent of λ, and it is markedly influenced by the scheme according to which A is varied; it depends directly upon the rate at which potentially excitable elements are added when A is made to increase. For simultaneous excitation of the two eyes (when of very nearly equivalent excitability), ΔĪ(B) is less than for stimulation of either eye alone, at all levels of I (1), A, λ. The mean ratio (ΔĪ(L) + ΔĪ(R))/2 to ΔI(B) was 1.38. For white light, doubling A on one retina reduces ΔI(m) in the ratio 1.21, or a little less than for binocular presentation under the same conditions. These facts are consistent with the view that the properties of ΔI are quantitatively determined by events central to the retina. The measure σ(1ΔI) of organic variation in discrimination of intensities and ΔI(m) are found to be in simple proportion, independent of I (1), A, λ (and exposure time). Variability (σ(1ΔI)) is not a function of the mode of presentation, save that it may be slightly higher when both retinas are excited, and its magnitude (for a given level of ΔI(m)) is independent of the law according to which the adjustable intensity I (2) is instrumentally controlled. The Rockefeller University Press 1939-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2237912/ /pubmed/19873136 Text en Copyright © Copyright, 1939, by The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Crozier, W. J. Holway, A. H. THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION |
title | THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION |
title_full | THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION |
title_fullStr | THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION |
title_full_unstemmed | THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION |
title_short | THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION |
title_sort | theory and measurement of visual mechanisms : iii. δi as a function of area, intensity, and wave-length, for monocular and binocular stimulation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2237912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19873136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crozierwj theoryandmeasurementofvisualmechanismsiiidiasafunctionofareaintensityandwavelengthformonocularandbinocularstimulation AT holwayah theoryandmeasurementofvisualmechanismsiiidiasafunctionofareaintensityandwavelengthformonocularandbinocularstimulation |