Cargando…

THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION

Measurements of ΔI as a function of retinal area illuminated have been obtained at various levels of standard intensity I (1), using "white" light and light of three modal wave-lengths (λ465, 525, 680), for monocular stimulation and for simultaneous excitation of the two eyes ("binocu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crozier, W. J., Holway, A. H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1939
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2237912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19873136
_version_ 1782150417823563776
author Crozier, W. J.
Holway, A. H.
author_facet Crozier, W. J.
Holway, A. H.
author_sort Crozier, W. J.
collection PubMed
description Measurements of ΔI as a function of retinal area illuminated have been obtained at various levels of standard intensity I (1), using "white" light and light of three modal wave-lengths (λ465, 525, 680), for monocular stimulation and for simultaneous excitation of the two eyes ("binocular"), using several methods of varying (rectangular) area and retinal location, with control of exposure time. For data homogeneous with respect to method of presentation, log ΔI(m) = -Z log A + C, where ΔI = Ĩ (2) – I (1), A is area illuminated, and C is a terminal constant (= log ΔI(m) for A = 1 unit) depending on the units in which ΔI and A are expressed, and upon I (1). The equation is readily deduced on dimensional grounds, without reference to specific theories of the nature of ΔI or of retinal area in terms of its excitable units. Z is independent of the units of I and A. Experimentally it is found to be the same for monocular and binocular excitations, as is to be expected. Also as is expected it is not independent of λ, and it is markedly influenced by the scheme according to which A is varied; it depends directly upon the rate at which potentially excitable elements are added when A is made to increase. For simultaneous excitation of the two eyes (when of very nearly equivalent excitability), ΔĪ(B) is less than for stimulation of either eye alone, at all levels of I (1), A, λ. The mean ratio (ΔĪ(L) + ΔĪ(R))/2 to ΔI(B) was 1.38. For white light, doubling A on one retina reduces ΔI(m) in the ratio 1.21, or a little less than for binocular presentation under the same conditions. These facts are consistent with the view that the properties of ΔI are quantitatively determined by events central to the retina. The measure σ(1ΔI) of organic variation in discrimination of intensities and ΔI(m) are found to be in simple proportion, independent of I (1), A, λ (and exposure time). Variability (σ(1ΔI)) is not a function of the mode of presentation, save that it may be slightly higher when both retinas are excited, and its magnitude (for a given level of ΔI(m)) is independent of the law according to which the adjustable intensity I (2) is instrumentally controlled.
format Text
id pubmed-2237912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1939
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22379122008-04-23 THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION Crozier, W. J. Holway, A. H. J Gen Physiol Article Measurements of ΔI as a function of retinal area illuminated have been obtained at various levels of standard intensity I (1), using "white" light and light of three modal wave-lengths (λ465, 525, 680), for monocular stimulation and for simultaneous excitation of the two eyes ("binocular"), using several methods of varying (rectangular) area and retinal location, with control of exposure time. For data homogeneous with respect to method of presentation, log ΔI(m) = -Z log A + C, where ΔI = Ĩ (2) – I (1), A is area illuminated, and C is a terminal constant (= log ΔI(m) for A = 1 unit) depending on the units in which ΔI and A are expressed, and upon I (1). The equation is readily deduced on dimensional grounds, without reference to specific theories of the nature of ΔI or of retinal area in terms of its excitable units. Z is independent of the units of I and A. Experimentally it is found to be the same for monocular and binocular excitations, as is to be expected. Also as is expected it is not independent of λ, and it is markedly influenced by the scheme according to which A is varied; it depends directly upon the rate at which potentially excitable elements are added when A is made to increase. For simultaneous excitation of the two eyes (when of very nearly equivalent excitability), ΔĪ(B) is less than for stimulation of either eye alone, at all levels of I (1), A, λ. The mean ratio (ΔĪ(L) + ΔĪ(R))/2 to ΔI(B) was 1.38. For white light, doubling A on one retina reduces ΔI(m) in the ratio 1.21, or a little less than for binocular presentation under the same conditions. These facts are consistent with the view that the properties of ΔI are quantitatively determined by events central to the retina. The measure σ(1ΔI) of organic variation in discrimination of intensities and ΔI(m) are found to be in simple proportion, independent of I (1), A, λ (and exposure time). Variability (σ(1ΔI)) is not a function of the mode of presentation, save that it may be slightly higher when both retinas are excited, and its magnitude (for a given level of ΔI(m)) is independent of the law according to which the adjustable intensity I (2) is instrumentally controlled. The Rockefeller University Press 1939-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2237912/ /pubmed/19873136 Text en Copyright © Copyright, 1939, by The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Crozier, W. J.
Holway, A. H.
THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION
title THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION
title_full THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION
title_fullStr THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION
title_full_unstemmed THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION
title_short THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS : III. ΔI AS A FUNCTION OF AREA, INTENSITY, AND WAVE-LENGTH, FOR MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR STIMULATION
title_sort theory and measurement of visual mechanisms : iii. δi as a function of area, intensity, and wave-length, for monocular and binocular stimulation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2237912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19873136
work_keys_str_mv AT crozierwj theoryandmeasurementofvisualmechanismsiiidiasafunctionofareaintensityandwavelengthformonocularandbinocularstimulation
AT holwayah theoryandmeasurementofvisualmechanismsiiidiasafunctionofareaintensityandwavelengthformonocularandbinocularstimulation