Cargando…

Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study

BACKGROUND: As no health system can afford to provide all possible services and treatments for the people it serves, each system must set priorities. Priority setting decision makers are increasingly involving the public in policy making. This study focuses on public engagement in a key priority set...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruni, Rebecca A, Laupacis, Andreas, Levinson, Wendy, Martin, Douglas K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2238747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18021393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-186
_version_ 1782150455102537728
author Bruni, Rebecca A
Laupacis, Andreas
Levinson, Wendy
Martin, Douglas K
author_facet Bruni, Rebecca A
Laupacis, Andreas
Levinson, Wendy
Martin, Douglas K
author_sort Bruni, Rebecca A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As no health system can afford to provide all possible services and treatments for the people it serves, each system must set priorities. Priority setting decision makers are increasingly involving the public in policy making. This study focuses on public engagement in a key priority setting context that plagues every health system around the world: wait list management. The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate priority setting for the Ontario Wait Time Strategy, with special attention to public engagement. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Ontario Wait Time Strategy in Ontario, Canada which is part of a Federal-Territorial-Provincial initiative to improve access and reduce wait times in five areas: cancer, cardiac, sight restoration, joint replacements, and diagnostic imaging. There were two sources of data: (1) over 25 documents (e.g. strategic planning reports, public updates), and (2) 28 one-on-one interviews with informants (e.g. OWTS participants, MOHLTC representatives, clinicians, patient advocates). Analysis used a modified thematic technique in three phases: open coding, axial coding, and evaluation. RESULTS: The Ontario Wait Time Strategy partially meets the four conditions of 'accountability for reasonableness'. The public was not directly involved in the priority setting activities of the Ontario Wait Time Strategy. Study participants identified both benefits (supporting the initiative, experts of the lived experience, a publicly funded system and sustainability of the healthcare system) and concerns (personal biases, lack of interest to be involved, time constraints, and level of technicality) for public involvement in the Ontario Wait Time Strategy. Additionally, the participants identified concern for the consequences (sustainability, cannibalism, and a class system) resulting from the Ontario Wait Times Strategy. CONCLUSION: We described and evaluated a wait time management initiative (the Ontario Wait Time Strategy) with special attention to public engagement, and provided a concrete plan to operationalize a strategy for improving public involvement in this, and other, wait time initiatives.
format Text
id pubmed-2238747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22387472008-02-12 Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study Bruni, Rebecca A Laupacis, Andreas Levinson, Wendy Martin, Douglas K BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: As no health system can afford to provide all possible services and treatments for the people it serves, each system must set priorities. Priority setting decision makers are increasingly involving the public in policy making. This study focuses on public engagement in a key priority setting context that plagues every health system around the world: wait list management. The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate priority setting for the Ontario Wait Time Strategy, with special attention to public engagement. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Ontario Wait Time Strategy in Ontario, Canada which is part of a Federal-Territorial-Provincial initiative to improve access and reduce wait times in five areas: cancer, cardiac, sight restoration, joint replacements, and diagnostic imaging. There were two sources of data: (1) over 25 documents (e.g. strategic planning reports, public updates), and (2) 28 one-on-one interviews with informants (e.g. OWTS participants, MOHLTC representatives, clinicians, patient advocates). Analysis used a modified thematic technique in three phases: open coding, axial coding, and evaluation. RESULTS: The Ontario Wait Time Strategy partially meets the four conditions of 'accountability for reasonableness'. The public was not directly involved in the priority setting activities of the Ontario Wait Time Strategy. Study participants identified both benefits (supporting the initiative, experts of the lived experience, a publicly funded system and sustainability of the healthcare system) and concerns (personal biases, lack of interest to be involved, time constraints, and level of technicality) for public involvement in the Ontario Wait Time Strategy. Additionally, the participants identified concern for the consequences (sustainability, cannibalism, and a class system) resulting from the Ontario Wait Times Strategy. CONCLUSION: We described and evaluated a wait time management initiative (the Ontario Wait Time Strategy) with special attention to public engagement, and provided a concrete plan to operationalize a strategy for improving public involvement in this, and other, wait time initiatives. BioMed Central 2007-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2238747/ /pubmed/18021393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-186 Text en Copyright © 2007 Bruni et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bruni, Rebecca A
Laupacis, Andreas
Levinson, Wendy
Martin, Douglas K
Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study
title Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study
title_full Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study
title_fullStr Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study
title_full_unstemmed Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study
title_short Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study
title_sort public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2238747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18021393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-186
work_keys_str_mv AT brunirebeccaa publicinvolvementintheprioritysettingactivitiesofawaittimemanagementinitiativeaqualitativecasestudy
AT laupacisandreas publicinvolvementintheprioritysettingactivitiesofawaittimemanagementinitiativeaqualitativecasestudy
AT levinsonwendy publicinvolvementintheprioritysettingactivitiesofawaittimemanagementinitiativeaqualitativecasestudy
AT martindouglask publicinvolvementintheprioritysettingactivitiesofawaittimemanagementinitiativeaqualitativecasestudy