Cargando…
Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study
BACKGROUND: As no health system can afford to provide all possible services and treatments for the people it serves, each system must set priorities. Priority setting decision makers are increasingly involving the public in policy making. This study focuses on public engagement in a key priority set...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2238747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18021393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-186 |
_version_ | 1782150455102537728 |
---|---|
author | Bruni, Rebecca A Laupacis, Andreas Levinson, Wendy Martin, Douglas K |
author_facet | Bruni, Rebecca A Laupacis, Andreas Levinson, Wendy Martin, Douglas K |
author_sort | Bruni, Rebecca A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As no health system can afford to provide all possible services and treatments for the people it serves, each system must set priorities. Priority setting decision makers are increasingly involving the public in policy making. This study focuses on public engagement in a key priority setting context that plagues every health system around the world: wait list management. The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate priority setting for the Ontario Wait Time Strategy, with special attention to public engagement. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Ontario Wait Time Strategy in Ontario, Canada which is part of a Federal-Territorial-Provincial initiative to improve access and reduce wait times in five areas: cancer, cardiac, sight restoration, joint replacements, and diagnostic imaging. There were two sources of data: (1) over 25 documents (e.g. strategic planning reports, public updates), and (2) 28 one-on-one interviews with informants (e.g. OWTS participants, MOHLTC representatives, clinicians, patient advocates). Analysis used a modified thematic technique in three phases: open coding, axial coding, and evaluation. RESULTS: The Ontario Wait Time Strategy partially meets the four conditions of 'accountability for reasonableness'. The public was not directly involved in the priority setting activities of the Ontario Wait Time Strategy. Study participants identified both benefits (supporting the initiative, experts of the lived experience, a publicly funded system and sustainability of the healthcare system) and concerns (personal biases, lack of interest to be involved, time constraints, and level of technicality) for public involvement in the Ontario Wait Time Strategy. Additionally, the participants identified concern for the consequences (sustainability, cannibalism, and a class system) resulting from the Ontario Wait Times Strategy. CONCLUSION: We described and evaluated a wait time management initiative (the Ontario Wait Time Strategy) with special attention to public engagement, and provided a concrete plan to operationalize a strategy for improving public involvement in this, and other, wait time initiatives. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2238747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22387472008-02-12 Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study Bruni, Rebecca A Laupacis, Andreas Levinson, Wendy Martin, Douglas K BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: As no health system can afford to provide all possible services and treatments for the people it serves, each system must set priorities. Priority setting decision makers are increasingly involving the public in policy making. This study focuses on public engagement in a key priority setting context that plagues every health system around the world: wait list management. The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate priority setting for the Ontario Wait Time Strategy, with special attention to public engagement. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Ontario Wait Time Strategy in Ontario, Canada which is part of a Federal-Territorial-Provincial initiative to improve access and reduce wait times in five areas: cancer, cardiac, sight restoration, joint replacements, and diagnostic imaging. There were two sources of data: (1) over 25 documents (e.g. strategic planning reports, public updates), and (2) 28 one-on-one interviews with informants (e.g. OWTS participants, MOHLTC representatives, clinicians, patient advocates). Analysis used a modified thematic technique in three phases: open coding, axial coding, and evaluation. RESULTS: The Ontario Wait Time Strategy partially meets the four conditions of 'accountability for reasonableness'. The public was not directly involved in the priority setting activities of the Ontario Wait Time Strategy. Study participants identified both benefits (supporting the initiative, experts of the lived experience, a publicly funded system and sustainability of the healthcare system) and concerns (personal biases, lack of interest to be involved, time constraints, and level of technicality) for public involvement in the Ontario Wait Time Strategy. Additionally, the participants identified concern for the consequences (sustainability, cannibalism, and a class system) resulting from the Ontario Wait Times Strategy. CONCLUSION: We described and evaluated a wait time management initiative (the Ontario Wait Time Strategy) with special attention to public engagement, and provided a concrete plan to operationalize a strategy for improving public involvement in this, and other, wait time initiatives. BioMed Central 2007-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2238747/ /pubmed/18021393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-186 Text en Copyright © 2007 Bruni et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bruni, Rebecca A Laupacis, Andreas Levinson, Wendy Martin, Douglas K Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study |
title | Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study |
title_full | Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study |
title_fullStr | Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study |
title_short | Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study |
title_sort | public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2238747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18021393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunirebeccaa publicinvolvementintheprioritysettingactivitiesofawaittimemanagementinitiativeaqualitativecasestudy AT laupacisandreas publicinvolvementintheprioritysettingactivitiesofawaittimemanagementinitiativeaqualitativecasestudy AT levinsonwendy publicinvolvementintheprioritysettingactivitiesofawaittimemanagementinitiativeaqualitativecasestudy AT martindouglask publicinvolvementintheprioritysettingactivitiesofawaittimemanagementinitiativeaqualitativecasestudy |