Cargando…

Assessing the evolutionary rate of positional orthologous genes in prokaryotes using synteny data

BACKGROUND: Comparison of completely sequenced microbial genomes has revealed how fluid these genomes are. Detecting synteny blocks requires reliable methods to determining the orthologs among the whole set of homologs detected by exhaustive comparisons between each pair of completely sequenced geno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lemoine, Frédéric, Lespinet, Olivier, Labedan, Bernard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2238764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18047665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-237
_version_ 1782150459091320832
author Lemoine, Frédéric
Lespinet, Olivier
Labedan, Bernard
author_facet Lemoine, Frédéric
Lespinet, Olivier
Labedan, Bernard
author_sort Lemoine, Frédéric
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comparison of completely sequenced microbial genomes has revealed how fluid these genomes are. Detecting synteny blocks requires reliable methods to determining the orthologs among the whole set of homologs detected by exhaustive comparisons between each pair of completely sequenced genomes. This is a complex and difficult problem in the field of comparative genomics but will help to better understand the way prokaryotic genomes are evolving. RESULTS: We have developed a suite of programs that automate three essential steps to study conservation of gene order, and validated them with a set of 107 bacteria and archaea that cover the majority of the prokaryotic taxonomic space. We identified the whole set of shared homologs between two or more species and computed the evolutionary distance separating each pair of homologs. We applied two strategies to extract from the set of homologs a collection of valid orthologs shared by at least two genomes. The first computes the Reciprocal Smallest Distance (RSD) using the PAM distances separating pairs of homologs. The second method groups homologs in families and reconstructs each family's evolutionary tree, distinguishing bona fide orthologs as well as paralogs created after the last speciation event. Although the phylogenetic tree method often succeeds where RSD fails, the reverse could occasionally be true. Accordingly, we used the data obtained with either methods or their intersection to number the orthologs that are adjacent in for each pair of genomes, the Positional Orthologous Genes (POGs), and to further study their properties. Once all these synteny blocks have been detected, we showed that POGs are subject to more evolutionary constraints than orthologs outside synteny groups, whichever the taxonomic distance separating the compared organisms. CONCLUSION: The suite of programs described in this paper allows a reliable detection of orthologs and is useful for evaluating gene order conservation in prokaryotes whichever their taxonomic distance. Thus, our approach will make easy the rapid identification of POGS in the next few years as we are expecting to be inundated with thousands of completely sequenced microbial genomes.
format Text
id pubmed-2238764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22387642008-02-12 Assessing the evolutionary rate of positional orthologous genes in prokaryotes using synteny data Lemoine, Frédéric Lespinet, Olivier Labedan, Bernard BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Comparison of completely sequenced microbial genomes has revealed how fluid these genomes are. Detecting synteny blocks requires reliable methods to determining the orthologs among the whole set of homologs detected by exhaustive comparisons between each pair of completely sequenced genomes. This is a complex and difficult problem in the field of comparative genomics but will help to better understand the way prokaryotic genomes are evolving. RESULTS: We have developed a suite of programs that automate three essential steps to study conservation of gene order, and validated them with a set of 107 bacteria and archaea that cover the majority of the prokaryotic taxonomic space. We identified the whole set of shared homologs between two or more species and computed the evolutionary distance separating each pair of homologs. We applied two strategies to extract from the set of homologs a collection of valid orthologs shared by at least two genomes. The first computes the Reciprocal Smallest Distance (RSD) using the PAM distances separating pairs of homologs. The second method groups homologs in families and reconstructs each family's evolutionary tree, distinguishing bona fide orthologs as well as paralogs created after the last speciation event. Although the phylogenetic tree method often succeeds where RSD fails, the reverse could occasionally be true. Accordingly, we used the data obtained with either methods or their intersection to number the orthologs that are adjacent in for each pair of genomes, the Positional Orthologous Genes (POGs), and to further study their properties. Once all these synteny blocks have been detected, we showed that POGs are subject to more evolutionary constraints than orthologs outside synteny groups, whichever the taxonomic distance separating the compared organisms. CONCLUSION: The suite of programs described in this paper allows a reliable detection of orthologs and is useful for evaluating gene order conservation in prokaryotes whichever their taxonomic distance. Thus, our approach will make easy the rapid identification of POGS in the next few years as we are expecting to be inundated with thousands of completely sequenced microbial genomes. BioMed Central 2007-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2238764/ /pubmed/18047665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-237 Text en Copyright © 2007 Lemoine et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lemoine, Frédéric
Lespinet, Olivier
Labedan, Bernard
Assessing the evolutionary rate of positional orthologous genes in prokaryotes using synteny data
title Assessing the evolutionary rate of positional orthologous genes in prokaryotes using synteny data
title_full Assessing the evolutionary rate of positional orthologous genes in prokaryotes using synteny data
title_fullStr Assessing the evolutionary rate of positional orthologous genes in prokaryotes using synteny data
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the evolutionary rate of positional orthologous genes in prokaryotes using synteny data
title_short Assessing the evolutionary rate of positional orthologous genes in prokaryotes using synteny data
title_sort assessing the evolutionary rate of positional orthologous genes in prokaryotes using synteny data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2238764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18047665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-237
work_keys_str_mv AT lemoinefrederic assessingtheevolutionaryrateofpositionalorthologousgenesinprokaryotesusingsyntenydata
AT lespinetolivier assessingtheevolutionaryrateofpositionalorthologousgenesinprokaryotesusingsyntenydata
AT labedanbernard assessingtheevolutionaryrateofpositionalorthologousgenesinprokaryotesusingsyntenydata