Cargando…

The floating knee: epidemiology, prognostic indicators & outcome following surgical management

BACKGROUND: Floating Knee injuries are complex injuries. The type of fractures, soft tissue and associated injuries make this a challenging problem to manage. We present the outcome of these injuries after surgical management. METHODS: 29 patients with floating knee injuries were managed over a 3 ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rethnam, Ulfin, Yesupalan, Rajam S, Nair, Rajagopalan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2241764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18271992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-1-2
_version_ 1782150530712207360
author Rethnam, Ulfin
Yesupalan, Rajam S
Nair, Rajagopalan
author_facet Rethnam, Ulfin
Yesupalan, Rajam S
Nair, Rajagopalan
author_sort Rethnam, Ulfin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Floating Knee injuries are complex injuries. The type of fractures, soft tissue and associated injuries make this a challenging problem to manage. We present the outcome of these injuries after surgical management. METHODS: 29 patients with floating knee injuries were managed over a 3 year period. This was a prospective study were both fractures of the floating knee injury were surgically fixed using different modalities. The associated injuries were managed appropriately. Assessment of the end result was done by the Karlstrom criteria after bony union. RESULTS: The mechanism of injury was road traffic accident in 27/29 patients. There were 38 associated injuries. 20/29 patients had intramedullary nailing for both fractures. The complications were knee stiffness, foot drop, delayed union of tibia and superficial infection. The bony union time ranged from 15 – 22.5 weeks for femur fractures and 17 – 28 weeks for the tibia. According to the Karlstrom criteria the end results were Excellent – 15, Good – 11, Acceptable – 1 and Poor – 3. CONCLUSION: The associated injuries and the type of fracture (open, intra-articular, comminution) are prognostic indicators in the Floating knee. Appropriate management of the associated injuries, intramedullary nailing of both the fractures and post operative rehabilitation are necessary for good final outcome.
format Text
id pubmed-2241764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22417642008-02-14 The floating knee: epidemiology, prognostic indicators & outcome following surgical management Rethnam, Ulfin Yesupalan, Rajam S Nair, Rajagopalan J Trauma Manag Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Floating Knee injuries are complex injuries. The type of fractures, soft tissue and associated injuries make this a challenging problem to manage. We present the outcome of these injuries after surgical management. METHODS: 29 patients with floating knee injuries were managed over a 3 year period. This was a prospective study were both fractures of the floating knee injury were surgically fixed using different modalities. The associated injuries were managed appropriately. Assessment of the end result was done by the Karlstrom criteria after bony union. RESULTS: The mechanism of injury was road traffic accident in 27/29 patients. There were 38 associated injuries. 20/29 patients had intramedullary nailing for both fractures. The complications were knee stiffness, foot drop, delayed union of tibia and superficial infection. The bony union time ranged from 15 – 22.5 weeks for femur fractures and 17 – 28 weeks for the tibia. According to the Karlstrom criteria the end results were Excellent – 15, Good – 11, Acceptable – 1 and Poor – 3. CONCLUSION: The associated injuries and the type of fracture (open, intra-articular, comminution) are prognostic indicators in the Floating knee. Appropriate management of the associated injuries, intramedullary nailing of both the fractures and post operative rehabilitation are necessary for good final outcome. BioMed Central 2007-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2241764/ /pubmed/18271992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-1-2 Text en Copyright © 2007 Rethnam et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rethnam, Ulfin
Yesupalan, Rajam S
Nair, Rajagopalan
The floating knee: epidemiology, prognostic indicators & outcome following surgical management
title The floating knee: epidemiology, prognostic indicators & outcome following surgical management
title_full The floating knee: epidemiology, prognostic indicators & outcome following surgical management
title_fullStr The floating knee: epidemiology, prognostic indicators & outcome following surgical management
title_full_unstemmed The floating knee: epidemiology, prognostic indicators & outcome following surgical management
title_short The floating knee: epidemiology, prognostic indicators & outcome following surgical management
title_sort floating knee: epidemiology, prognostic indicators & outcome following surgical management
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2241764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18271992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-1-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rethnamulfin thefloatingkneeepidemiologyprognosticindicatorsoutcomefollowingsurgicalmanagement
AT yesupalanrajams thefloatingkneeepidemiologyprognosticindicatorsoutcomefollowingsurgicalmanagement
AT nairrajagopalan thefloatingkneeepidemiologyprognosticindicatorsoutcomefollowingsurgicalmanagement
AT rethnamulfin floatingkneeepidemiologyprognosticindicatorsoutcomefollowingsurgicalmanagement
AT yesupalanrajams floatingkneeepidemiologyprognosticindicatorsoutcomefollowingsurgicalmanagement
AT nairrajagopalan floatingkneeepidemiologyprognosticindicatorsoutcomefollowingsurgicalmanagement