Cargando…
Evaluating the effect of neighbourhood weight matrices on smoothing properties of Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models
BACKGROUND: The Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) model is widely used in many small-area ecological studies to analyse outcomes measured at an areal level. There has been little evaluation of the influence of different neighbourhood weight matrix structures on the amount of smoothing performed by th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2242788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18045503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-6-54 |
_version_ | 1782150567786708992 |
---|---|
author | Earnest, Arul Morgan, Geoff Mengersen, Kerrie Ryan, Louise Summerhayes, Richard Beard, John |
author_facet | Earnest, Arul Morgan, Geoff Mengersen, Kerrie Ryan, Louise Summerhayes, Richard Beard, John |
author_sort | Earnest, Arul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) model is widely used in many small-area ecological studies to analyse outcomes measured at an areal level. There has been little evaluation of the influence of different neighbourhood weight matrix structures on the amount of smoothing performed by the CAR model. We examined this issue in detail. METHODS: We created several neighbourhood weight matrices and applied them to a large dataset of births and birth defects in New South Wales (NSW), Australia within 198 Statistical Local Areas. Between the years 1995–2003, there were 17,595 geocoded birth defects and 770,638 geocoded birth records with available data. Spatio-temporal models were developed with data from 1995–2000 and their fit evaluated within the following time period: 2001–2003. RESULTS: We were able to create four adjacency-based weight matrices, seven distance-based weight matrices and one matrix based on similarity in terms of a key covariate (i.e. maternal age). In terms of agreement between observed and predicted relative risks, categorised in epidemiologically relevant groups, generally the distance-based matrices performed better than the adjacency-based neighbourhoods. In terms of recovering the underlying risk structure, the weight-7 model (smoothing by maternal-age 'Covariate model') was able to correctly classify 35/47 high-risk areas (sensitivity 74%) with a specificity of 47%, and the 'Gravity' model had sensitivity and specificity values of 74% and 39% respectively. CONCLUSION: We found considerable differences in the smoothing properties of the CAR model, depending on the type of neighbours specified. This in turn had an effect on the models' ability to recover the observed risk in an area. Prior to risk mapping or ecological modelling, an exploratory analysis of the neighbourhood weight matrix to guide the choice of a suitable weight matrix is recommended. Alternatively, the weight matrix can be chosen a priori based on decision-theoretic considerations including loss, cost and inferential aims. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2242788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22427882008-02-14 Evaluating the effect of neighbourhood weight matrices on smoothing properties of Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models Earnest, Arul Morgan, Geoff Mengersen, Kerrie Ryan, Louise Summerhayes, Richard Beard, John Int J Health Geogr Methodology BACKGROUND: The Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) model is widely used in many small-area ecological studies to analyse outcomes measured at an areal level. There has been little evaluation of the influence of different neighbourhood weight matrix structures on the amount of smoothing performed by the CAR model. We examined this issue in detail. METHODS: We created several neighbourhood weight matrices and applied them to a large dataset of births and birth defects in New South Wales (NSW), Australia within 198 Statistical Local Areas. Between the years 1995–2003, there were 17,595 geocoded birth defects and 770,638 geocoded birth records with available data. Spatio-temporal models were developed with data from 1995–2000 and their fit evaluated within the following time period: 2001–2003. RESULTS: We were able to create four adjacency-based weight matrices, seven distance-based weight matrices and one matrix based on similarity in terms of a key covariate (i.e. maternal age). In terms of agreement between observed and predicted relative risks, categorised in epidemiologically relevant groups, generally the distance-based matrices performed better than the adjacency-based neighbourhoods. In terms of recovering the underlying risk structure, the weight-7 model (smoothing by maternal-age 'Covariate model') was able to correctly classify 35/47 high-risk areas (sensitivity 74%) with a specificity of 47%, and the 'Gravity' model had sensitivity and specificity values of 74% and 39% respectively. CONCLUSION: We found considerable differences in the smoothing properties of the CAR model, depending on the type of neighbours specified. This in turn had an effect on the models' ability to recover the observed risk in an area. Prior to risk mapping or ecological modelling, an exploratory analysis of the neighbourhood weight matrix to guide the choice of a suitable weight matrix is recommended. Alternatively, the weight matrix can be chosen a priori based on decision-theoretic considerations including loss, cost and inferential aims. BioMed Central 2007-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2242788/ /pubmed/18045503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-6-54 Text en Copyright © 2007 Earnest et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Earnest, Arul Morgan, Geoff Mengersen, Kerrie Ryan, Louise Summerhayes, Richard Beard, John Evaluating the effect of neighbourhood weight matrices on smoothing properties of Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models |
title | Evaluating the effect of neighbourhood weight matrices on smoothing properties of Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models |
title_full | Evaluating the effect of neighbourhood weight matrices on smoothing properties of Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the effect of neighbourhood weight matrices on smoothing properties of Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the effect of neighbourhood weight matrices on smoothing properties of Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models |
title_short | Evaluating the effect of neighbourhood weight matrices on smoothing properties of Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models |
title_sort | evaluating the effect of neighbourhood weight matrices on smoothing properties of conditional autoregressive (car) models |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2242788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18045503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-6-54 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT earnestarul evaluatingtheeffectofneighbourhoodweightmatricesonsmoothingpropertiesofconditionalautoregressivecarmodels AT morgangeoff evaluatingtheeffectofneighbourhoodweightmatricesonsmoothingpropertiesofconditionalautoregressivecarmodels AT mengersenkerrie evaluatingtheeffectofneighbourhoodweightmatricesonsmoothingpropertiesofconditionalautoregressivecarmodels AT ryanlouise evaluatingtheeffectofneighbourhoodweightmatricesonsmoothingpropertiesofconditionalautoregressivecarmodels AT summerhayesrichard evaluatingtheeffectofneighbourhoodweightmatricesonsmoothingpropertiesofconditionalautoregressivecarmodels AT beardjohn evaluatingtheeffectofneighbourhoodweightmatricesonsmoothingpropertiesofconditionalautoregressivecarmodels |