Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: study protocol for a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN17553857)

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers are a major problem, especially in nursing home patients, although they are regarded as preventable and there are many pressure relieving methods and materials. One such pressure relieving material is the recently developed Australian Medical Sheepskin, which has been sho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mistiaen, Patriek, Achterberg, Wilco, Ament, Andre, Halfens, Ruud, Huizinga, Janneke, Montgomery, Ken, Post, Henri, Francke, Anneke L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2245931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18179714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-4
_version_ 1782150687849709568
author Mistiaen, Patriek
Achterberg, Wilco
Ament, Andre
Halfens, Ruud
Huizinga, Janneke
Montgomery, Ken
Post, Henri
Francke, Anneke L
author_facet Mistiaen, Patriek
Achterberg, Wilco
Ament, Andre
Halfens, Ruud
Huizinga, Janneke
Montgomery, Ken
Post, Henri
Francke, Anneke L
author_sort Mistiaen, Patriek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers are a major problem, especially in nursing home patients, although they are regarded as preventable and there are many pressure relieving methods and materials. One such pressure relieving material is the recently developed Australian Medical Sheepskin, which has been shown in two randomized controlled trials [1,2] to be an effective intervention in the prevention of sacral pressure ulcers in hospital patients. However, the use of sheepskins has been debated and in general discouraged by most pressure ulcer working groups and pressure ulcer guidelines, but these debates were based on old forms of sheepskins. Furthermore, nothing is yet known about the (cost-)effectiveness of the Australian Medical sheepskin in nursing home patients. The objective of this study is to assess the effects and costs of the use of the Australian Medical Sheepskin combined with usual care with regard to the prevention of sacral pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients, versus usual care only. METHODS/DESIGN: In a multi-centre randomised controlled trial 750 patients admitted for a primarily somatic reason to one of the five participating nursing homes, and not having pressure ulcers on the sacrum at admission, will be randomized to either usual care only or usual care plus the use of the Australian Medical Sheepskin as an overlay on the mattress. Outcome measures are: incidence of sacral pressure ulcers in the first month after admission; sacrum pressure ulcer free days; costs; patient comfort; and ease of use. The skin of all the patients will be observed once a day from admission on for 30 days. Patient characteristics and pressure risk scores are assessed at admission and at day 30 after it. Additional to the empirical phase, systematic reviews will be performed in order to obtain data for economic weighting and modelling. The protocol is registered in the Controlled Trial Register as ISRCTN17553857.
format Text
id pubmed-2245931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22459312008-02-16 Cost-effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: study protocol for a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN17553857) Mistiaen, Patriek Achterberg, Wilco Ament, Andre Halfens, Ruud Huizinga, Janneke Montgomery, Ken Post, Henri Francke, Anneke L BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers are a major problem, especially in nursing home patients, although they are regarded as preventable and there are many pressure relieving methods and materials. One such pressure relieving material is the recently developed Australian Medical Sheepskin, which has been shown in two randomized controlled trials [1,2] to be an effective intervention in the prevention of sacral pressure ulcers in hospital patients. However, the use of sheepskins has been debated and in general discouraged by most pressure ulcer working groups and pressure ulcer guidelines, but these debates were based on old forms of sheepskins. Furthermore, nothing is yet known about the (cost-)effectiveness of the Australian Medical sheepskin in nursing home patients. The objective of this study is to assess the effects and costs of the use of the Australian Medical Sheepskin combined with usual care with regard to the prevention of sacral pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients, versus usual care only. METHODS/DESIGN: In a multi-centre randomised controlled trial 750 patients admitted for a primarily somatic reason to one of the five participating nursing homes, and not having pressure ulcers on the sacrum at admission, will be randomized to either usual care only or usual care plus the use of the Australian Medical Sheepskin as an overlay on the mattress. Outcome measures are: incidence of sacral pressure ulcers in the first month after admission; sacrum pressure ulcer free days; costs; patient comfort; and ease of use. The skin of all the patients will be observed once a day from admission on for 30 days. Patient characteristics and pressure risk scores are assessed at admission and at day 30 after it. Additional to the empirical phase, systematic reviews will be performed in order to obtain data for economic weighting and modelling. The protocol is registered in the Controlled Trial Register as ISRCTN17553857. BioMed Central 2008-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2245931/ /pubmed/18179714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-4 Text en Copyright © 2008 Mistiaen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Mistiaen, Patriek
Achterberg, Wilco
Ament, Andre
Halfens, Ruud
Huizinga, Janneke
Montgomery, Ken
Post, Henri
Francke, Anneke L
Cost-effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: study protocol for a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN17553857)
title Cost-effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: study protocol for a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN17553857)
title_full Cost-effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: study protocol for a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN17553857)
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: study protocol for a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN17553857)
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: study protocol for a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN17553857)
title_short Cost-effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: study protocol for a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN17553857)
title_sort cost-effectiveness of the australian medical sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: study protocol for a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial (isrctn17553857)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2245931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18179714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mistiaenpatriek costeffectivenessoftheaustralianmedicalsheepskinforthepreventionofpressureulcersinsomaticnursinghomepatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn17553857
AT achterbergwilco costeffectivenessoftheaustralianmedicalsheepskinforthepreventionofpressureulcersinsomaticnursinghomepatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn17553857
AT amentandre costeffectivenessoftheaustralianmedicalsheepskinforthepreventionofpressureulcersinsomaticnursinghomepatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn17553857
AT halfensruud costeffectivenessoftheaustralianmedicalsheepskinforthepreventionofpressureulcersinsomaticnursinghomepatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn17553857
AT huizingajanneke costeffectivenessoftheaustralianmedicalsheepskinforthepreventionofpressureulcersinsomaticnursinghomepatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn17553857
AT montgomeryken costeffectivenessoftheaustralianmedicalsheepskinforthepreventionofpressureulcersinsomaticnursinghomepatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn17553857
AT posthenri costeffectivenessoftheaustralianmedicalsheepskinforthepreventionofpressureulcersinsomaticnursinghomepatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn17553857
AT franckeannekel costeffectivenessoftheaustralianmedicalsheepskinforthepreventionofpressureulcersinsomaticnursinghomepatientsstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn17553857