Cargando…
Novel biomarkers in critical care: utility or futility?
One of the holy grails of modern medicine, across a range of clinical sub-specialties, is establishing highly sensitive and specific biomarkers for various diseases. Significant success has been achieved in some of these clinical areas, most notably identifying high-sensitivity C-reactive peptide, t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18001503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6127 |
_version_ | 1782150737904533504 |
---|---|
author | Ackland, Gareth L Mythen, Michael G |
author_facet | Ackland, Gareth L Mythen, Michael G |
author_sort | Ackland, Gareth L |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the holy grails of modern medicine, across a range of clinical sub-specialties, is establishing highly sensitive and specific biomarkers for various diseases. Significant success has been achieved in some of these clinical areas, most notably identifying high-sensitivity C-reactive peptide, troponin I/T and brain natriuretic peptide as significant prognosticators for both the acute outcome and the development of cardiovascular pathology. However, it is highly debatable whether this translates to complex, multi-system pathophysiological insults. Is critical care immune from the application of these novel biomarkers, given the numerous confounding factors interfering with their interpretation? |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2246196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22461962008-02-20 Novel biomarkers in critical care: utility or futility? Ackland, Gareth L Mythen, Michael G Crit Care Commentary One of the holy grails of modern medicine, across a range of clinical sub-specialties, is establishing highly sensitive and specific biomarkers for various diseases. Significant success has been achieved in some of these clinical areas, most notably identifying high-sensitivity C-reactive peptide, troponin I/T and brain natriuretic peptide as significant prognosticators for both the acute outcome and the development of cardiovascular pathology. However, it is highly debatable whether this translates to complex, multi-system pathophysiological insults. Is critical care immune from the application of these novel biomarkers, given the numerous confounding factors interfering with their interpretation? BioMed Central 2007 2007-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2246196/ /pubmed/18001503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6127 Text en Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Ackland, Gareth L Mythen, Michael G Novel biomarkers in critical care: utility or futility? |
title | Novel biomarkers in critical care: utility or futility? |
title_full | Novel biomarkers in critical care: utility or futility? |
title_fullStr | Novel biomarkers in critical care: utility or futility? |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel biomarkers in critical care: utility or futility? |
title_short | Novel biomarkers in critical care: utility or futility? |
title_sort | novel biomarkers in critical care: utility or futility? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18001503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT acklandgarethl novelbiomarkersincriticalcareutilityorfutility AT mythenmichaelg novelbiomarkersincriticalcareutilityorfutility |